Dataset Information

Lesion Revascularisation Subsequent to Femoropopliteal Spot Stenting Using the Multi-LOC Stent Delivery System.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND/AIM:Restenosis and stent fractures are well-characterised treatment failures following femoropopliteal (FP) stent-based interventions. We aimed to determine patterns of restenosis and fracture rates following focal stenting of FP arteries. PATIENTS AND METHODS:This retrospective study investigated angiographic patterns of restenosis and the occurrence of stent fractures following focal FP stenting with the multiple stent delivery system VascuFlex® Multi-LOC. RESULTS:We identified 10 patients with 10 (of 129) FP lesions (mean length 11.7±4.6 cm) and a total of 51 (of 646) Multi-LOC stents that underwent clinically driven target lesion revascularizations (TLR) after 11.5±9.2 months, due to symptomatic recurrence of stenosis. None of the Multi-LOC stents had fractured. No isolated in-stent restenosis (>50%) was observed. Median diameter lumen loss was significantly more pronounced at the inter-stent segments (27.0%) compared to in-stent segments (7.8%, p=0.023). CONCLUSION:No evidence of fracture or susceptibility to stent-related restenosis using Multi-LOC stents was observed. Focal FP stenting may be more effective when combined with strategies known to reduce restenosis in non-stented artery segments.

SUBMITTER: Sigl M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6984117 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan-Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Lesion Revascularisation Subsequent to Femoropopliteal Spot Stenting Using the Multi-LOC Stent Delivery System.

Sigl Martin M Amendt Klaus K Waliszewski Matthias M Rathmann Nils N

In vivo (Athens, Greece) 20200101 1

<h4>Background/aim</h4>Restenosis and stent fractures are well-characterised treatment failures following femoropopliteal (FP) stent-based interventions. We aimed to determine patterns of restenosis and fracture rates following focal stenting of FP arteries.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>This retrospective study investigated angiographic patterns of restenosis and the occurrence of stent fractures following focal FP stenting with the multiple stent delivery system VascuFlex® Multi-LOC.<h4>Results< ...[more]

PMID: 31882510

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivePrimary nitinol stenting (PNS) and drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty are two of the most common endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease. Although many prospective randomized controlled trials have compared PNS or DCB with plain balloon angioplasty (POBA), no studies have directly compared PNS against DCB therapy. The purpose of this network meta-analysis is to determine whether there is a significant difference in outcomes between PNS and DCB.MethodsThe primary outcome measure was binary restenosis, the secondary outcome measures were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and change in the ankle-brachial index (ABI). Outcomes were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months. A literature review identified all randomized controlled trials published before March 2020 that compared DCB with POBA or PNS with POBA in the treatment of native atherosclerotic lesions of the femoropopliteal artery. Studies were excluded if they contained in-stent stenosis or tibial artery disease that could not be delineated out in a subgroup analysis. Network meta-analysis was performed using the network and mvmeta commands in STATA 14.ResultsTwenty-seven publications covering 19 trials were identified; 8 trials compared PNS with POBA and 11 trials compared DCB with POBA. The odds of freedom from binary restenosis for patients treated with DCB compared with PNS at 6 months was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-2.22), at 12 months was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.04-2.68), and at 24 months was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.78-2.37). The odds of freedom from TLR for patients treated with DCB compared with PNS at 6 months was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.12-3.80), at 12 months was 1.89 (95% CI, 1.04-3.45), and at 24 months was 1.68 (95% CI, 0.82-3.44). The mean increase in ABI for patients treated with PNS compared with DCB at 6 months was 0.06 higher (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.15), at 12 months was 0.05 higher (95% CI, 0.00-0.09), and at 24 months was 0.07 higher (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.14).ConclusionsBoth DCB and PNS demonstrated a lower rate of binary restenosis compared with POBA at the 6-, 12-, and 24-month timepoints. When comparing DCB with PNS through network meta-analysis, DCB had a statistically lower rate of a binary restenosis and TLR at the 12-month timepoint. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that both DCB and PNS are superior to POBA, and that PNS is a satisfactory substitute for DCB when paclitaxel is not desirable.

Project description:BackgroundThe accurate placement of stents for treatment of coronary aorto-ostial lesions (AOLs) is technically challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a stent positioning system with a dedicated nitinol device and compare them with those of the conventional approach for stenting of coronary AOLs.MethodsIn this prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized study, conducted from November 2015 to April 2019, patients with coronary AOLs that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly allocated (allocation ratio 1:1) using block randomization method to either a stent positioning system group or a conventional technique group. The primary endpoint was the range of stent slippage when positioning. The following secondary endpoints were applied: (I) the extent of swing of the guiding catheters during stent positioning; (II) the rate of accurate stent placement; (III) the procedure time; and (IV) the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis.ResultsDuring the study period, 139 patients with aorto-ostial coronary artery stenosis were included at 5 centers. A total of 69 patients were allocated to the stent positioning system group and 70 patients to the conventional technique group. Angiographic and clinical success were achieved in 100% of the patients included in both groups. The range of stent slippage was significantly shorter in the stent positioning system group than it was in the conventional technique group [0.64 (0.22; 1.35) vs. 1.11 (0.48; 1.72) mm, P=0.01]. The rate of accurate placement of stents was higher in the stent positioning system group than it was in the conventional technique group (74.6% vs. 57.1%, P=0.03). The extent of guiding catheter swing during the stent positioning [0.24 (0.19; 0.53) vs. 0.23 (0.19; 0.53) mm; P=0.95] and the MACEs rates (1.4% vs. 2.9%, P>0.99) were similar between the 2 groups. The procedural time of the stent positioning system was longer than that of the conventional approach [1.00 (0.50; 1.50) vs. 0.80 (0.50; 1.50) min, P=0.09].ConclusionsThe dedicated stent positioning system was is safer and provides more accurate placement of stents for coronary AOLs than the conventional approach, and the associated prolongation of procedure time is insignificant.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100053869. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133280.

Project description:Currently, endovascular treatment is indicated to treat femoropopliteal lesions ?15 cm. However, the Achilles' heel of femoropopliteal endovascular repair remains restenosis. Paclitaxel eluting stents have shown promising results to prevent restenosis in femoropopliteal lesions compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A recently released prospective registry using a newer generation of self-expandable nitinol stents (Misago®; Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan) supports primary bare metal stenting as a first-line treatment for femoropopliteal lesions. To date, no studies have been designed to compare bare metal stents to paclitaxel eluting stents for the treatment of femoropoliteal lesions. The BATTLE trial was designed to compare paclitaxel eluting stents (Zilver® PTX®) and a last generation bare self-expandable nitinol stents (Misago® RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan) in the treatment of intermediate length femoropopliteal lesions (?14 cm).A prospective, randomized (1:1), controlled, multicentric and international study has been designed. One hundred and eighty-six patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomized to one of the two assessments of endovascular repair to treat de novo femoropopliteal lesions ?14 cm in symptomatic patients (Rutherford 2 to 5): bare stent group and paclitaxel eluting stent group. The primary endpoint is freedom from in-stent restenosis at 1 year defined by a peak systolic velocity index >2.4 (restenosis of >50%) at the target lesion and assessed by duplex scan. Our main objective is to demonstrate the clinical superiority of primary stenting using Zilver® PTX® stent system versus bare metal self-expandable stenting in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.This is the first randomized and controlled study to compare the efficacy of bare metal stents and paclitaxel eluting stents for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. It may clarify the indication of stent choice for femoropopliteal lesions of intermediate length.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02004951. 3 December 2013.

Dataset Information

Lesion Revascularisation Subsequent to Femoropopliteal Spot Stenting Using the Multi-LOC Stent Delivery System.

Publications

Lesion Revascularisation Subsequent to Femoropopliteal Spot Stenting Using the Multi-LOC Stent Delivery System.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets