Dataset Information

Napsin-A and AMACR are Superior to HNF-1β in Distinguishing Between Mesonephric Carcinomas and Clear Cell Carcinomas of the Gynecologic Tract.

ABSTRACT: Mesonephric carcinoma is a rare gynecologic neoplasm commonly mistaken for clear cell carcinoma, because of their overlapping morphologic features. Both tumors are negative for estrogen receptor and p16, magnifying this diagnostic dilemma. Recently, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 beta (HNF-1β), a marker for clear cell carcinoma, has also been shown to be positive in mesonephric carcinomas. Other more recent markers for clear cell carcinoma, however, such as Napsin-A and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), have not yet been studied in mesonephric carcinomas. Here we examine HNF-1β, AMACR, and Napsin-A immunohistochemistry in 18 mesonephric and 55 endometrial/cervical clear cell carcinomas. HNF-1β was considered positive if nuclear staining was present in ≥70% of cells and at least moderate intensity; for Napsin-A and AMACR, any cytoplasmic staining was considered positive (≥1%). H-scores were determined by multiplying the intensity score by proportion score. HNF-1β was positive in a substantial portion of mesonephric carcinomas (9/18, 50%; H-score 98) and clear cell carcinomas (34/55, 62%; H-score 163) and did not distinguish between the 2 entities (specificity, 50%; P-value of H-score=0.08). Napsin-A and AMACR expression was significantly higher in clear cell [43/55 (78%) and 41/55 (75%), respectively] than mesonephric carcinomas [4/18 (22%) and 4/18 (22%) respectively], and helpful in this differential (specificity: 78% and 78%; P<0.05 for both). When Napsin-A and AMACR staining were seen in mesonephric carcinomas, staining was focal (≤5%), whereas staining in clear cell carcinomas was patchy/diffuse. In summary, Napsin-A and AMACR are helpful in distinguishing mesonephric carcinomas from clear cell carcinomas of the female genital tract, but HNF-1β is not.

SUBMITTER: Pors J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6987010 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Mesonephric carcinoma of the cervix is a rare tumor derived from Wolffian remnants. Mesonephric-like carcinomas of the ovary and endometrium, while morphologically similar, do not have obvious Wolffian derivation. Here, we sought to characterize the repertoire of genetic alterations in primary mesonephric and mesonephric-like carcinomas, in the distinct histologic components of mixed cases, as well as in matched primary tumors and metastases. DNA from microdissected tumor and normal tissue from mesonephric carcinomas (cervix, n = 8) and mesonephric-like carcinomas (ovarian n = 15, endometrial n = 13) were subjected to sequencing targeting 468 cancer-related genes. The histologically distinct components of four cases with mixed histology and four primary tumors and their matched metastases were microdissected and analyzed separately. Mesonephric-like carcinomas were underpinned by somatic KRAS mutations (25/28, 89%) akin to mesonephric carcinomas (8/8, 100%), but also harbored genetic alterations more frequently reported in Müllerian tumors. Mesonephric-like carcinomas that lacked KRAS mutations harbored NRAS (n = 2, ovary) or BRAF (n = 1, endometrium) hotspot mutations. PIK3CA mutations were identified in both mesonephric-like (8/28, 28%) and mesonephric carcinomas (2/8, 25%). Only mesonephric-like tumors harbored CTNNB1 hotspot (4/28, 14%) and PTEN (3/13, 23%) mutations. Copy number analysis revealed frequent gains of chromosomes 1q and 10 in both mesonephric (87% 1q; 50% chromosome 10) and mesonephric-like tumors (89% 1q; 43% chromosome 10). Chromosome 12 gains were more frequent in ovarian mesonephric-like carcinomas, and losses of chromosome 9 were more frequent in mesonephric than in mesonephric-like carcinomas (both p = 0.01, Fisher's exact test). The histologically distinct components of four mixed cases were molecularly related and shared similar patterns of genetic alterations. The progression from primary to metastatic lesions involved the acquisition of additional mutations, and/or shifts from subclonal to clonal mutations. Our findings suggest that mesonephric-like carcinomas are derived from a Müllerian substrate with differentiation along Wolffian/mesonephric lines.

Project description:Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a distinct histologic subtype with relatively poor survival. No prognostic or predictive molecular marker is currently available. Recent studies have shown that AT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations are common genetic changes in ovarian CCC. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β (HNF-1β) expression has been proven to be highly sensitive and specific for clear cell histology. However, the correlations between these biomarkers and clinicopathologic variables and survival outcomes are controversial. The immunohistochemical analysis for HNF-1β, ARID1A, and PIK3CA was performed on a tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of 130 cases of ovarian CCC (237 tissue blocks) linked with clinical information. The immunostaining results were interpreted in a manner consistent with previous publications. The associations between biomarker expression and clinical and prognostic features were examined. All statistical analyses were conducted using 2-sided tests, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. HNF-1β was expressed in 92.8% of all primary ovarian tumors, while the loss of ARID1A and PIK3CA was noted in 56.2% and 45.0%, respectively. Early-stage tumors tended to have high levels of HNF-1β immunoreactivity and expression of ARID1A (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03). Most patients (76.9%, 20/26) with concurrent endometriosis stained negative for ARID1A (P = 0.02). No relation was found between PIK3CA expression and clinical features. Low-level HNF-1β expression and loss of ARID1A were more commonly observed in patients with tumor recurrence (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001). Antibody expression was not associated with platinum-based chemotherapy response. Patients with negative ARID1A expression had worse survival outcome in terms of both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). On the contrary, patients with high-level HNF-1β were associated with good prognosis (P = 0.02 for OS and P = 0.01 for PFS). PIK3CA expression had no impact on survival. For univariate and multivariate analyses, only HNF-1β expression seemed to be a prognostic factor for favorable OS (P = 0.04). The loss of ARID1A was correlated with late-stage and endometriosis-associated tumors. The measurement of ARID1A expression might be a method to predict the risk of recurrence. Among the 3 biomarkers, only high-level HNF-1β expression proved to be a positive predictor for OS.

Project description:Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium is a rare type of endometrial cancer that is generally associated with an aggressive clinical behaviour. Here, we sought to define the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in endometrial clear cell carcinomas (ECCs), and whether ECCs could be classified into the molecular subtypes described for endometrial endometrioid and serous carcinomas. We performed a rigorous histopathological review, immunohistochemical analysis and massively parallel sequencing targeting 300 cancer-related genes of 32 pure ECCs. Eleven (34%), seven (22%) and six (19%) ECCs showed abnormal expression patterns for p53, ARID1A, and at least one DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein, respectively. Targeted sequencing data were obtained from 30 of the 32 ECCs included in this study, and these revealed that two ECCs (7%) were ultramutated and harboured mutations affecting the exonuclease domain of POLE. In POLE wild-type ECCs, TP53 (46%), PIK3CA (36%), PPP2R1A (36%), FBXW7 (25%), ARID1A (21%), PIK3R1 (18%) and SPOP (18%) were the genes most commonly affected by mutations; 18% and 11% harboured CCNE1 and ERBB2 amplifications, respectively, and 11% showed DAXX homozygous deletions. ECCs less frequently harboured mutations affecting CTNNB1 and PTEN but more frequently harboured PPP2R1A and TP53 mutations than non-POLE endometrioid carcinomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Compared to endometrial serous carcinomas (TCGA), ECCs less frequently harboured TP53 mutations. When a surrogate model for the molecular-based TCGA classification was used, all molecular subtypes previously identified in endometrial endometrioid and serous carcinomas were present in the ECCs studied, including POLE, MMR-deficient, copy-number high (serous-like)/p53 abnormal, and copy-number low (endometrioid)/p53 wild-type, which were significantly associated with disease-free survival in univariate analysis. These findings demonstrate that ECCs constitute a histologically and genetically heterogeneous group of tumours with varying outcomes. Furthermore, our data suggest that the classification of ECCs as being generally 'high-grade' or 'type II' tumours may not be warranted. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Dataset Information

Napsin-A and AMACR are Superior to HNF-1β in Distinguishing Between Mesonephric Carcinomas and Clear Cell Carcinomas of the Gynecologic Tract.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure