Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Rethinking Measures of Functional Connectivity via Feature Extraction.


ABSTRACT: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based functional connectivity (FC) commonly characterizes the functional connections in the brain. Conventional quantification of FC by Pearson's correlation captures linear, time-domain dependencies among blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals. We examined measures to quantify FC by investigating: (i) Is Pearson's correlation sufficient to characterize FC? (ii) Can alternative measures better quantify FC? (iii) What are the implications of using alternative FC measures? FMRI analysis in healthy adult population suggested that: (i) Pearson's correlation cannot comprehensively capture BOLD inter-dependencies. (ii) Eight alternative FC measures were similarly consistent between task and resting-state fMRI, improved age-based classification and provided better association with behavioral outcomes. (iii) Formulated hypotheses were: first, in lieu of Pearson's correlation, an augmented, composite and multi-metric definition of FC is more appropriate; second, canonical large-scale brain networks may depend on the chosen FC measure. A thorough notion of FC promises better understanding of variations within a given population.

SUBMITTER: Mohanty R 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6987226 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Rethinking Measures of Functional Connectivity via Feature Extraction.

Mohanty Rosaleena R   Sethares William A WA   Nair Veena A VA   Prabhakaran Vivek V  

Scientific reports 20200128 1


Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based functional connectivity (FC) commonly characterizes the functional connections in the brain. Conventional quantification of FC by Pearson's correlation captures linear, time-domain dependencies among blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals. We examined measures to quantify FC by investigating: (i) Is Pearson's correlation sufficient to characterize FC? (ii) Can alternative measures better quantify FC? (iii) What are the implications of using  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4260483 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4400084 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10171516 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4709183 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10502833 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5561846 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6783552 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3896172 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9920122 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5082505 | biostudies-other