Dataset Information

Effect of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators on Malignant Progression and Prognosis in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Objectives: This study aims to explore the roles of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and identify a risk signature and prognostic values of m6A RNA methylation regulators in ccRCC. Materials and Methods: RNA sequence data of ccRCC was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators in ccRCC stratified by different clinicopathological characteristics were unveiled using "limma" package in R version 3.6.0. Cox regression and LASSO analyses were conducted to identify the powerful independent prognostic factors in ccRCC associated with overall survival (OS). Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and correlation analyses of the 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were performed using "STRING" and R package, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also done using R. In addition, gene ontology (GO), GSEA and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways were used to functionally annotate the differentially expressed genes in different subgroups. Results: Most of the 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators are differentially expressed in ccRCC tissue samples stratified by different clinicopathological characteristics in 537 patients. Next, a risk signature for predicting prognosis of ccRCC patients, was established based on two powerful independent prognostic m6A RNA methylation regulators (METTL14 and METTL3). Then, two subgroups (cluster1 and 2) were identified by consensus clustering to the two powerful independent factors and the cluster1 had a poorer prognosis than cluster2. Furthermore, the genes in cluster1 were significantly enriched in cancer-related pathways, biological process, and hallmarks, including "cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)," "leukocyte migration," "Wnt/?-catenin signaling," and so on. Conclusion: M6A RNA methylation regulators play important roles in the initiation and progression of ccRCC and provide a novel sight to understand m6A RNA modification in ccRCC.

SUBMITTER: Wang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6992564 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators on Malignant Progression and Prognosis in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.

Wang Jiawu J Zhang Chengyao C He Weiyang W Gou Xin X

Frontiers in oncology 20200124

Objectives: This study aims to explore the roles of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and identify a risk signature and prognostic values of m6A RNA methylation regulators in ccRCC. Materials and Methods: RNA sequence data of ccRCC was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators in ccRCC stratified by different clinicopathological cha ...[more]

PMID: 32038982

Similar Datasets

Project description:N6‑methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation is the most prevalent type of mRNA modification; however, little is known about its function in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The present study aimed to establish and validate a m6A‑related risk signature as a prognostic factor for patients with ccRCC. Consensus clustering was used to divide patients with ccRCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n=489) into three clusters (cluster 1/2/3) based on 19 m6A RNA methylation regulators. In addition, a m6A‑related risk signature was constructed using TCGA data, and its accuracy was validated using data from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (n=91). The prognostic performance of the risk signature was evaluated by Kaplan‑Meier analyses, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression, multivariate Cox regression, receiver operating characteristic curves and nomograms. The results revealed that the majority of the 19 m6A RNA methylation regulators were differentially expressed among ccRCC stratified by different clinicopathological features. The cluster 1 group exhibited a higher frequency of metastasis and poorer overall survival compared with the cluster 2/cluster 3 group. The hallmarks of RNA metabolism, transcription misregulation in cancer and regulation of autophagy, were significantly enriched in the cluster 1 group. A m6A‑related risk signature was constructed and validated with high prognostic accuracy for the prediction of 5‑year survival and recurrence (area under the curve, 0.736 and 0.728, respectively). The present study also established robust nomograms for evaluating the risk of mortality and recurrence for patients with ccRCC (c‑index, 0.783 and 0.819, respectively). The dysregulation of hub m6A RNA methylation regulator expression levels and m6A RNA methylation levels were also validated in multiple RCC cells using in vitro experiments. Taken together, the m6A RNA methylation regulators promoted the malignant progression of ccRCC and exhibited good performance in prognostic predictions. These results provided insight into the development of m6A‑targeted treatments for ccRCC.

Project description:PurposeN6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications represent one of the most common methylation modifications, and they are mediated by m6A RNA methylation regulators. However, their functions in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the regulators in RCC.Materials and methodsThe expression levels of the 13 main m6A RNA methylation regulators in RCC were detected and consensus clustering was performed to explore their relationships with RCC. Thereafter, a risk signature based on the regulators was established. This risk model was fully verified by conducting prognostic analyses using two datasets (The Cancer Genome Atlas [TCGA] and Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO] datasets) and a ROC curve analysis.ResultsOf the 13 main m6A regulators, six were significantly upregulated and four were significantly downregulated in 893 RCC cases compared to 128 normal controls in the TCGA database. Consensus clustering based on the regulators identified two clusters of RCC cases, which were significantly associated with a pathological characteristic (T status). Thus, these results indicated that m6A RNA methylation regulators were associated with RCC. Thereafter, a risk model involving two of the regulators (METTL14 and WTAP) was established. The alterations in the mRNA and protein expression levels of these two regulators were further confirmed based on Human Protein Atlas data and real-time PCR in RCC and normal cell lines. The results indicated that the risk model may serve as an independent prognostic marker of overall survival, and it was also associated with clinicopathological characteristics (T status, M status, pathological stage, and gender) in RCC.ConclusionCollectively, the results of this study indicated that the risk model (based on two m6A RNA methylation regulators) may serve as an independent prognostic indicator of RCC, which may aid further investigation into m6A RNA modification in RCC.

Dataset Information

Effect of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators on Malignant Progression and Prognosis in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.

Publications

Effect of m<sup>6</sup>A RNA Methylation Regulators on Malignant Progression and Prognosis in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets