Dataset Information

Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is commonly used to assess inhibition in the motor cortex and is known to be affected by the paired-pulse stimulus parameters (i.e., interstimulus interval [ISI], conditioning stimulus intensity [CSI] and test stimulus intensity [TSI]) used during testing. While the effects of stimulus parameters are well-studied in the upper-extremity, evidence in the lower-extremity is lacking. OBJECTIVE:To comprehensively examine the effects of alterations in paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of SICI in the quadriceps muscle group. METHODS:Seventeen adults (8 males, 9 females) volunteered to participate in this study. SICI was examined over a range of CSIs (70-90% active motor threshold [AMT]), TSIs (100-140% AMT), and ISIs (1.0-3.0?ms) using both EMG and torque responses elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). RESULTS:The results indicated that SICI at 1.0?ms ISI was best revealed with a CSI of 70% and TSI ?110% AMT, whereas SICI at 2.5?ms ISI was best revealed with a CSI of 80-90% and a TSI of ?130% AMT. Unlike upper-extremity muscles, evaluating SICI with a CSI of 70% AMT and an ISI of 1.0?ms produced the greatest inhibition for all TSIs. In general, inhibitory effects were contaminated by facilitatory effects when using a TSI of 100% AMT. CONCLUSIONS:The amount of inhibition was dependent on the stimulation parameters used during testing. A CSI of 70% AMT, ISI of 1.0?ms, and TSI of ?110% AMT appear to be optimal for measuring SICI in the quadriceps muscle; however, other parameters can be used if careful consideration is given to the described interaction between the parameters.

SUBMITTER: Krishnan C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6995364 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group.

Krishnan Chandramouli C

Restorative neurology and neuroscience 20190101 4

<h4>Background</h4>Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is commonly used to assess inhibition in the motor cortex and is known to be affected by the paired-pulse stimulus parameters (i.e., interstimulus interval [ISI], conditioning stimulus intensity [CSI] and test stimulus intensity [TSI]) used during testing. While the effects of stimulus parameters are well-studied in the upper-extremity, evidence in the lower-extremity is lacking.<h4>Objective</h4>To comprehensively examine the eff ...[more]

PMID: 31306142

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a predominantly anterior-posterior (AP) or posterior-anterior (PA) current direction over the primary motor cortex appear to activate distinct excitatory inputs to corticospinal neurons. In contrast, very few reports have examined whether the inhibitory neurons responsible for short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) are sensitive to TMS current direction.ObjectivesTo investigate whether SICI evaluated with AP and PA conditioning stimuli (CSPA and CSAP) activate different inhibitory pathways. SICI was always assessed using a PA-oriented test stimulus (TSPA).MethodsUsing two superimposed TMS coils, CSPA and CSAP were applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) of 1-5 ms before a TSPA, and at a range of different intensities. Using a triple stimulation design, we then tested whether SICI at ISI of 3 ms using opposite directions of CS (SICICSPA3 and SICICSAP3) interacted differently with three other forms of inhibition, including SICI at ISI of 2 ms (SICICSPA2), cerebellum-motor cortex inhibition (CBI 5 ms) and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI 22 ms). Finally, we compared the effect of tonic and phasic voluntary contraction on SICICSPA3 and SICICSAP3.ResultsCSAP produced little SICI at ISIs = 1 and 2 ms. However, at ISI = 3 ms, both CSAP and CSPA were equally effective at the same percent of maximum stimulator output. Despite this apparent similarity, combining SICICSPA3 or SICICSAP3 with other forms of inhibition led to quite different results: SICICSPA3 interacted in complex ways with CBI, SAI and SICICSPA2, whereas the effect of SICICSAP3 appeared to be quite independent of them. Although SICICSPA and SICICSAP were both reduced by the same amount during voluntary tonic contraction compared with rest, in a simple reaction time task SICICSAP was disinhibited much earlier following the imperative signal than SICICSPA.ConclusionsSICICSPA appears to activate a different inhibitory pathway to that activated by SICICSAP. The difference is behaviourally relevant since the pathways are controlled differently during volitional contraction. The results may explain some previous pathological data and open the possibility of testing whether these pathways are differentially recruited in a range of tasks.

Project description:ObjectiveProgressive myoclonic epilepsy type 1 (EPM1) is caused by biallelic alterations in the CSTB gene, most commonly dodecamer repeat expansions. Although transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) was previously reported to be normal in EPM1, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was reduced. We explored the association between these measures and the clinical and genetic features in a separate group of patients with EPM1.MethodsTMS combined with electromyography was performed under neuronavigation. LICI was induced with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 100 ms, and SICI with ISIs of 2 and 3 ms, and their means (mSICIs) were expressed as the ratio of conditioned to unconditioned stimuli. LICI and mSICI were compared between patients and controls. Nonparametric correlation was used to study the association between inhibition and parameters of clinical severity, including the Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS); among patients with EPM1 due to biallelic expansion repeats, also the association with the number of repeats was assessed.ResultsThe study protocol was completed in 19 patients (15 with biallelic expansion repeats and 4 compound heterozygotes), and 7 healthy, age- and sex-matched control participants. Compared to controls, patients demonstrated significantly less SICI (median mSICI ratio 1.18 vs 0.38; p < .001). Neither LICI nor SICI was associated with parameters of clinical severity. In participants with biallelic repeat expansions, the number of repeats in the more affected allele (greater repeat number [GRN]) correlated with LICI (rho = 0.872; p < .001) and SICI (rho = 0.689; p = .006).SignificanceOur results strengthen the finding of deranged γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic inhibition in EPM1. LICI and SICI may have use as markers of GABAergic impairment in future trials of disease-modifying treatment in this condition. Whether a higher number of expansion repeats leads to greater GABAergic impairment warrants further study.

Dataset Information

Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group.

Publications

Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets