Dataset Information

Strength in numbers? The fragility index of studies from the Scandinavian knee ligament registries.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The fragility index (FI) is a metric to evaluate the robustness of statistically significant results. It describes the number of patients who would need to change from a non-event to an event to change a result from significant to non-significant. This systematic survey aimed to evaluate the feasibility of applying the FI to findings related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the Scandinavian knee ligament registries.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and AMED databases were searched. Studies from the Scandinavian knee ligament registers were eligible if they reported a statistically significant result (p < 0.05) for any of the following dichotomous outcomes; ACL revision, contralateral ACL reconstruction or the presence of postoperative knee laxity. Only studies with a two-arm comparative analysis were included. Eligibility assessment, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The dichotomous analyses were stratified according to the grouping variable for the two comparative arms as follows; age, patient sex, activity at injury, graft choice, drilling technique, graft fixation, single- versus double-bundle, concomitant cartilage injury and country. The two-sided Fisher's exact test was used to calculate the FI of all statistically significant analyses.

Results

From 158 identified studies, 13 studies were included. They reported statistical significance for a total of 56 dichotomous analyses, of which all but two had been determined by a time-to-event analysis. The median sample size for the arms was 5540 (range 92-38,666). The mean FI for all 56 dichotomous analyses was 80.6 (median 34.5), which means that a mean of 80.6 patients were needed to change outcome status to generate a non-significant result instead of a significant one. Seventeen analyses (30.4%) immediately became non-significant when performing the two-sided Fisher's exact test and, therefore, had an FI of 0. The analyses related to age were the most robust, with a mean FI of 178.5 (median 116, range 1-1089). The mean FI of the other grouping variables ranged from 0.5 to 48.0.

Conclusion

There was large variability in the FI in analyses from the Scandinavian knee ligament registries and almost one third of the analyses had an FI of zero. The FI is a rough measurement of robustness when applied to registry studies, however, future studies are needed to determine the most appropriate metric for robustness in registry studies. The use of the FI can provide clinicians with a deeper understanding of significant study results and promotes an evidence-based approach in the clinical care of patients.

Level of evidence

Systematic review of prospective cohort studies, Level II.

SUBMITTER: Svantesson E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6995986 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundKnee joint kinematics and kinetics during running recover at 12 months, not 6 months, following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Knee muscle strength is a criterion used to assess an individual's readiness to return-to-sports (RTS); however, the relationship between knee muscle strength and knee biomechanics is unclear. This study investigated the relationship between knee muscle strength and dynamic knee biomechanics during running at 6 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction surgery.MethodsKnee joint kinematics and kinetics during running were analyzed in 21 patients (10 males, 11 females) who underwent ACL reconstruction for a unilateral ACL deficiency. Kinematics and Kinetics were measured by three-dimensional motion analysis system, and Knee flexion angle was calculated using Point cluster technique and internal extension moment was calculated by the inverse dynamics method. Patients were compared to a control group matched by age, height and weight. Isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength in ACL-reconstructed patients were measured at 6 and 12 months postsurgery, by separated gender.ResultsKnee flexion angle was significantly lower in ACL patients at 6 months postsurgery compared to the control group (F (2, 62)=5.78, P=0.014). There were significant lower peak knee flexion angles in male groups than female (F (1, 62)=6.33, P<0.01). Knee extension moments were significantly lower in both male and female ACL patients compared to the control group at 6 and 12 months postsurgery (F (2, 62)=12.05, P<0.01(6 months), P=0.034(12 months)), and there were significant correlations with knee extension moments and maximum torque of knee extension/flexion (P<0.05). At 12 months after surgery, knee joint kinematics in ACL patients were restored. Both peak knee angle and knee extension moment were significantly associated with maximum knee extension/flexion torque values in female patients at 12 months postsurgery.ConclusionsDynamic knee biomechanics during running were not restored 6 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction both male and female. It is necessary to strengthen knee extension and flexion muscles to restore knee kinetics during running, especially female patients.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate whether contralateral limb strength represents a dynamic, rather than static, data point after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R).MethodsPatients who underwent isolated ACL-R at a single institution were identified. Patients completed an institutional Lower-Extremity Assessment Protocol (LEAP) testing protocol at 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Extension strength and flexion strength of the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs and limb symmetry index (LSI) were compared between the 6- and 9-month testing outcomes. Subgroup analysis compared patients demonstrating less than or greater than 10% change in contralateral limb flexion and extension strength between 6 and 9 months postoperatively.ResultsA total of 144 subjects were included in this study. On average, contralateral limb flexion and extension strength increased 2-4% between 6 and 9 months postoperatively. However, the contralateral limb increased >10% from 6 to 9 months in extension and flexion strength in 35/144 (24.3%) and 55/144 (38.2%) of patients, respectively. The cohort with >10% change between 6 and 9 months had significantly weaker contralateral extension and flexion strength at 6 months compared to the cohort that demonstrated <10% change (extension: 2.00 vs 2.39; P < .001; flexion: 0.84 vs 1.08; P < .001), but similar ipsilateral limb performance. Therefore, the >10% change cohort had a significantly greater LSI at 6 months compared to the <10% change cohort (67.3% vs 59.4%; P = .006). No demographic or operative factors correlated with which patients demonstrated >10% flexion or extension strength changes of the contralateral limb.ConclusionA large percentage of patients demonstrate significant changes in their contralateral limb flexion and extension strength between 6 and 9 months postoperatively that result from an initial contralateral limb strength deficit. This may limit the utility of the contralateral limb as a control for comparison to the operative extremity during return to sport assessment.

Project description:BackgroundThigh muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can persist after returning to activity. While resistance training can improve muscle function, "nonfunctional" training methods are not optimal for inducing transfer of benefits to activities such as walking. Here, we tested the feasibility of a novel functional resistance training (FRT) approach to restore strength and function in an individual with ACLR.HypothesisFRT would improve knee strength and function after ACLR.Study designCase report.Level of evidenceLevel 5.MethodsA 15-year-old male patient volunteered for an 8-week intervention where he performed 30 minutes of treadmill walking, 3 times per week, while wearing a custom-designed knee brace that provided resistance to the thigh muscles of his ACLR leg. Thigh strength, gait mechanics, and corticospinal and spinal excitability were assessed before and immediately after the 8-week intervention. Voluntary muscle activation was evaluated immediately after the intervention.ResultsKnee extensor and flexor strength increased in the ACLR leg from pre- to posttraining (130 to 225 N·m [+74%] and 44 to 88 N·m [+99%], respectively) and increases in between-limb extensor and flexor strength symmetry (45% to 92% [+74%] and 47% to 72% [+65%], respectively) were also noted. After the intervention, voluntary muscle activation in the ACLR leg was 72%, compared with the non-ACLR leg at 75%. Knee angle and moment during late stance phase decreased (ie, improved) in the ACLR leg and appeared more similar to the non-ACLR leg after FRT training (18° to 14° [-23.4] and 0.07 to -0.02 N·m·kg-1·m-1 [-122.8%], respectively). Corticospinal and spinal excitability in the ACLR leg decreased (3511 to 2511 [-28.5%] and 0.42 to 0.24 [-43.7%], respectively) from pre- to posttraining.ConclusionA full 8 weeks of FRT that targeted both quadriceps and hamstring muscles lead to improvements in strength and gait, suggesting that FRT may constitute a promising and practical alternative to traditional methods of resistance training.Clinical relevanceFRT may serve as a viable approach to improve knee strength and function after ACL reconstruction.

Project description:BackgroundHip and knee arthroplasties are common and successful procedures, however, success and durability are not guaranteed. The revision burden, defined as the ratio of implant revisions to the total number of arthroplasties in a specific period, is a measure of the steady state of arthroplasty success in a given registry. This study examines the hypothesis that revision burden would be similar among contemporary joint replacement registries and improving over time compared with historic controls.MethodsWe evaluated the national joint registries of 5 health systems (Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry [AOANJRR]; National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man; New Zealand Joint Registry [NZJR]; Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register [SHAR] and Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register [SKAR]; and the American Joint Replacement Registry [AJRR]) for hip and knee revision burden over the past 4 years or since registry inception. Historic controls were obtained from previously published reports.ResultsThe 2014 hip revision burden varied from 9.7 percent (NJR) to 11.9 percent (NZJR), and the unweighted average was 10.4 percent. The 2011, 2012, and 2013 mean hip revision burden was 11.9, 11.9, and 11.4 percent. The 2014 knee revision burden varied from to 6.0 percent (NJR) to 8.1 percent (AJRR), and the unweighted average for the 5 registries studied was 7.0 percent. The 2011, 2012, and 2013 mean knee revision burden was 6.9, 7.0, and 7.0 percent. Historically, the observed hip revision burden was 15.8 percent and the knee revision burden 8.0 percent.ConclusionsRevision burden has gradually decreased for hip replacements and has remained relatively constant for knee replacements both for the last 4 years and compared to historic controls. Knee revision burden was lower than hip revision burden for each period examined. Revision burden is one measure that may be helpful in following the effect of changes in surgical technique and implant design over time in registry populations and may be a helpful way to compare overall results between registries.