Dataset Information

Measured GFR by Utilizing Population Pharmacokinetic Methods to Determine Iohexol Clearance.

ABSTRACT: Introduction:There is an increasing demand for accurately measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Iohexol serum clearance has become a new gold standard, but it is challenging when GFR is low and 24-hour sampling is required for accurate results. The primary aim of this study was to develop an iohexol pharmacokinetic population model for accurate determination of individual GFR using limited sampling for up to 5 hours also when renal function is <40 ml/min. Methods:A nonparametric iohexol population pharmacokinetic model was developed with rich data from 176 patients. In a validation cohort of 43 patients, a model-determined GFR (iohexol clearance) using different limited sampling strategies for up to 5 hours was compared with the strategy currently used in routine care, a log-linear 2-point method. In all, 1526 iohexol concentrations were used, from patients ranging in age from 1 to 82 years and GFR from 14 to 149 ml/min. Results:The clinical 2-point method showed insufficient agreement compared with reference values; 15% of GFR values had an error of greater than ±10% even when sampling for 24 hours when estimating GFR <40 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (standard procedure). Restricted sampling the first 5 hours with the population model required 4 samples to determine GFR accurately. This strategy showed excellent agreement with the reference; <3% of GFR values had an error greater than ±10 %. Conclusion:Using an iohexol population pharmacokinetic model allows for accurate determination of GFR within 5 hours when applying 4 optimally timed samples, even in patients with GFR <40 ml/min.

SUBMITTER: Asberg A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7000849 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Measured GFR by Utilizing Population Pharmacokinetic Methods to Determine Iohexol Clearance.

Åsberg Anders A Bjerre Anna A Almaas Runar R Luis-Lima Sergio S Robertsen Ida I Salvador Cathrin Lytomt CL Porrini Esteban E Schwartz George J GJ Hartmann Anders A Bergan Stein S

Kidney international reports 20191206 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>There is an increasing demand for accurately measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Iohexol serum clearance has become a new gold standard, but it is challenging when GFR is low and 24-hour sampling is required for accurate results. The primary aim of this study was to develop an iohexol pharmacokinetic population model for accurate determination of individual GFR using limited sampling for up to 5 hours also when renal function is <40 ml/min.<h4>Methods</h4>A nonparamet ...[more]

PMID: 32043033

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesFormal evaluation of kidney function before and after hematopoietic cell transplant is important to determine conditioning regimens, type of transplant, and medication dosing. Serum creatinine and estimating equations may not accurately assess kidney function.Design, study, participants, & measurementsExisting estimating equations for GFR were compared with an iohexol measure of GFR in a prospective cohort study of 50 patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant and subsequent care at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute from 2009 to 2013. Patients underwent iohexol GFR, serum creatinine, and cystatin C determination at baseline and day 100 posthematopoietic cell transplant. Iohexol GFR measurements were compared with the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration, Inker CKD Epidemiology Collaboration cystatin C with and without serum creatinine, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, and Cockcroft-Gault estimating equations using Bland-Altman analysis and McNemar's test. The iohexol measurements were also compared with blood samples collected simultaneously on filter paper.ResultsMean differences between iohexol GFR and eGFR on the basis of Bland-Altman analyses ranged from -20.6 to +15.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at baseline and -12.7 to +12.9 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at day 100. The CKD Epidemiology Collaboration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimating equations classified 64% of patients with a GFR<90 at baseline compared with 38% by iohexol GFR (P=0.003 and P<0.01, respectively). No statistically significant differences were seen at day 100. The filter paper GFR had a mean difference of 0 at baseline and 5.9 at day 100. Additionally, 21%-37% and 57%-89% of eGFRs were within 10% and 30%, respectively, of the iohexol GFR at baseline, and 16%-34% and 72%-84% were within 10% and 30%, respectively, of the iohexol GFR at day 100; 98% of the filter paper estimates at baseline were within 30%, and 46% were within 10% of iohexol GFR.ConclusionsThe estimating equations are neither accurate nor precise in the hematopoietic cell transplant population, and clinical decision may require measurement of GFR.

Dataset Information

Measured GFR by Utilizing Population Pharmacokinetic Methods to Determine Iohexol Clearance.

Publications

Measured GFR by Utilizing Population Pharmacokinetic Methods to Determine Iohexol Clearance.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets