Dataset Information

Recovery in cognitive motor dissociation after severe brain injury: A cohort study.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To investigate the functional and cognitive outcomes during early intensive neurorehabilitation and to compare the recovery patterns of patients presenting with cognitive motor dissociation (CMD), disorders of consciousness (DOC) and non-DOC. METHODS:We conducted a single center observational cohort study of 141 patients with severe acquired brain injury, consecutively admitted to an acute neurorehabilitation unit. We divided patients into three groups according to initial neurobehavioral diagnosis at admission using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and the Motor Behavior Tool (MBT): potential clinical CMD, [N = 105]; DOC [N = 19]; non-DOC [N = 17]). Functional and cognitive outcomes were assessed at admission and discharge using the Glasgow Outcome Scale, the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index, the Disability Rating Scale, the Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning, the Functional Ambulation Classification Scale and the modified Rankin Scale. Confirmed recovery of conscious awareness was based on CRS-R criteria. RESULTS:CMD patients were significantly associated with better functional outcomes and potential for improvement than DOC. Furthermore, outcomes of CMD patients did not differ significantly from those of non-DOC. Using the CRS-R scale only; approximatively 30% of CMD patients did not recover consciousness at discharge. INTERPRETATION:Our findings support the fact that patients presenting with CMD condition constitute a separate category, with different potential for improvement and functional outcomes than patients suffering from DOC. This reinforces the need for CMD to be urgently recognized, as it may directly affect patient care, influencing life-or-death decisions.

SUBMITTER: Johr J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7001945 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Cognitive motor dissociation describes a subset of patients with disorders of consciousness who show neuroimaging evidence of consciousness but no detectable command-following behaviours. Although essential for family counselling, decision-making, and the design of rehabilitation programmes, the prognosis for patients with cognitive motor dissociation remains under-investigated. The current study included 78 patients with disorders of consciousness who showed no detectable command-following behaviours. These patients included 45 patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and 33 patients in a minimally conscious state, as diagnosed using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Each patient underwent an EEG-based brain-computer interface experiment, in which he or she was instructed to perform an item-selection task (i.e. select a photograph or a number from two candidates). Patients who achieved statistically significant brain-computer interface accuracies were identified as cognitive motor dissociation. Two evaluations using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, one before the experiment and the other 3 months later, were carried out to measure the patients' behavioural improvements. Among the 78 patients with disorders of consciousness, our results showed that within the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patient group, 15 of 18 patients with cognitive motor dissociation (83.33%) regained consciousness, while only five of the other 27 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients without significant brain-computer interface accuracies (18.52%) regained consciousness. Furthermore, within the minimally conscious state patient group, 14 of 16 patients with cognitive motor dissociation (87.5%) showed improvements in their Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores, whereas only four of the other 17 minimally conscious state patients without significant brain-computer interface accuracies (23.53%) had improved Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores. Our results suggest that patients with cognitive motor dissociation have a better outcome than other patients. Our findings extend current knowledge of the prognosis for patients with cognitive motor dissociation and have important implications for brain-computer interface-based clinical diagnosis and prognosis for patients with disorders of consciousness.

Project description:Introduction: Brain plasticity, synaptic regeneration and neuroinflammation are crucial mechanisms that play important roles in the recovery from acute brain injuries, such as aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), ischemic stroke (IS), and traumatic brain injury (TBI). The p75 neurotrophic receptor (p75NTR) is a significant receptor that modulates brain plasticity, neuroinflammation and apoptosis, making it an interesting target for therapeutic interventions. However, despite the progress made in understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in brain plasticity and neuroinflammation, there are still significant knowledge gaps in identifying protein biomarkers and microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with different types of acute brain injuries. Addressing these gaps will be critical in advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in brain injury and developing effective therapies or prognostic strategies for recovery. Hypotheses: We hypothesized that changes in serum levels of p75NTR and its linked neuroinflammatory signaling proteins could predict recovery from acute brain injuries, regardless of injury type. Differentially expressed (DE) circulating miRNAs following acute brain injuries may regulate studied protein targets and overall injury outcome. Methods: A prospective cohort of 74 patients with ischemic stroke (n=30), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=31), and traumatic brain injury (n=13) was evaluated. Serum samples were collected at two time points after the injury (early at 1.9 ± 1.0 days and late at 5.9 ± 2.2 days) and outcome evaluation was performed after three months. Six proteins were measured using ELISAs: p75NTR, NGF, sortilin, IL1, TNF, and cyclophilin A. A 2-tailed 2-sample t-test, univariate, and multivariate linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to compare serum molecules between patients with favorable (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3) and unfavorable outcome (mRS 4-6). Additionally, circulating miRNAs were extracted from the samples (n=48, early and late) and DE miRNAs were identified using DESeq2. The miRNA putative target genes were predicted and LDA was performed using the normalized expression values of identified DE miRNAs. Results: In this study, p75NTR (p < 0.01) and IL1 (p < 0.05) were found to be independently associated with outcome among the six circulating protein biomarkers studied. Combinatory LDA analysis of all six biomarkers showed significant predictive value for favorable outcome (OR 2.95 (1.46-5.98); area under the curve (AUC)= 71.2%, 95% CI = (0.590-0.833), p = 0.003). Temporal alterations of miRNA expression were observed in the aSAH, TBI, and IS groups (p<0.05, FDR corrected). Twenty-three common miRNAs were identified that differentiated favorable and unfavorable outcome (p<0.05) in all three groups. LDA of four identified miRNAs with predicted targets to studied proteins showed high predictive accuracy (OR (95% CI) 11.7 (2.39-226)); AUC = 94.1%, 95% CI = (0.849 - 1.00), p = 0.016). Conclusions This study indicates that assessing serum levels of p75NTR and its mechanistically linked proteins can predict recovery outcome in patients with different types of acute brain injuries. The combined miRNA and protein biomarker models demonstrated accurate outcome prediction across diverse injury types, implying the presence of a common recovery mechanism. DE miRNAs were found to target the studied molecules, suggesting a potential mechanistical role in recovery. The identified common miRNAs may provide new targets for mechanistic validation in disease models. Further investigation is warranted to validate and explore the potential of these proteins and miRNAs in prognostication and as therapeutic targets for enhancing recovery from acute brain injuries.

Dataset Information

Recovery in cognitive motor dissociation after severe brain injury: A cohort study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets