Dataset Information

Shift work and risk of skin cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Shift work with circadian disruption has been considered as a carcinogenic risk factor for skin cancer. The few prior studies that investigated the association between shift work and skin cancer have inconclusive results. Our main objective was to evaluate the associations between shift work and the risks of different types of skin cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Science Direct until October 2018 for studies that included a relationship between shift work and skin cancer. Our search yielded 193 articles and 9 studies met the criteria for our review. The included studies involved 3,579,147 participants and 17,308 skin cancer cases. Overall, ever shift work, was associated with increased risk of melanoma (RR?=?1.10, 95% CI?=?1.05-1.16) and a significant decrease in the risk of BCC (RR?=?0.90, 95% CI?=?0.88-0.93). No association between shift work and the risk of SCC was detected. Interestingly, our dose response analysis demonstrated that the risk of melanoma cumulatively increases by 2% for every year of shift work (RR?=?1.02; 95% CI?=?1.00-1.03). In conclusion, shift work is associated with increased risk of melanoma and deceased risk of BCC. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to elucidate the related potential biological mechanisms.

SUBMITTER: Yousef E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7005031 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Shift work and risk of skin cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yousef Einas E Mitwally Noha N Noufal Noha N Tahir Muhammad Ramzan MR

Scientific reports 20200206 1

Shift work with circadian disruption has been considered as a carcinogenic risk factor for skin cancer. The few prior studies that investigated the association between shift work and skin cancer have inconclusive results. Our main objective was to evaluate the associations between shift work and the risks of different types of skin cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Science Direct until October 2018 for studies that included a relationship bet ...[more]

PMID: 32029836

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Nightshift work introduces light at night and causes circadian rhythm among night workers, who are considered to be at increased risk of cancer. However, in the last 2 years, nine population-based studies reported insignificant associations between night-shift work and cancer risks. We aimed to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the effect of night-shift work on the incidence of cancers. Methods: Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO and complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were used to comprehensively search studies published up to May 31, 2019. The random-effect model (Der Simonian-Laird method) was carried out to combine the risk estimates of night-shift work for cancers. The dose-response meta-analysis was performed to verify whether the association was in a dose-dependent manner. Results: Our literature searching retrieved 1,660 publications. Included in the meta-analyses were 57 eligible studies with 8,477,849 participants (mean age 55 years; 2,560,886 men, 4,220,154 women, and 1,696,809 not mentioned). The pooled results showed that night-shift work was not associated with the risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.009, 95% CI = 0.984-1.033), prostate cancer (OR = 1.027, 95% CI = 0.982-1.071), ovarian cancer (OR = 1.027, 95% CI = 0.942-1.113), pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.007, 95% CI = 0.910-1.104), colorectal cancer (OR = 1.016, 95% CI = 0.964-1.068), non-Hodgkin's lymph (OR = 1.046, 95% CI = 0.994-1.098), and stomach cancer (OR = 1.064, 95% CI = 0.971-1.157), while night-shift work was associated with a reduction of lung cancer (OR = 0.949, 95% CI = 0.903-0.996), and skin cancer (OR = 0.916, 95% CI = 0.879-0.953). The dose-response meta-analysis found that cancer risk was not significantly elevated with the increased light exposure of night- shift work. Conclusion: This systematic review of 57 observational studies did not find an overall association between ever-exposure to night-shift work and the risk of breast, prostate ovarian, pancreatic, colorectal, non-Hodgkin's lymph, and stomach cancers.

Project description:ObjectiveTo synthesise the association of shift work with major vascular events as reported in the literature.Data sourcesSystematic searches of major bibliographic databases, contact with experts in the field, and review of reference lists of primary articles, review papers, and guidelines.Study selectionObservational studies that reported risk ratios for vascular morbidity, vascular mortality, or all cause mortality in relation to shift work were included; control groups could be non-shift ("day") workers or the general population.Data extractionStudy quality was assessed with the Downs and Black scale for observational studies. The three primary outcomes were myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and any coronary event. Heterogeneity was measured with the I(2) statistic and computed random effects models.Results34 studies in 2,011,935 people were identified. Shift work was associated with myocardial infarction (risk ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.31; I(2)=0) and ischaemic stroke (1.05, 1.01 to 1.09; I(2)=0). Coronary events were also increased (risk ratio 1.24, 1.10 to 1.39), albeit with significant heterogeneity across studies (I(2)=85%). Pooled risk ratios were significant for both unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusted for risk factors. All shift work schedules with the exception of evening shifts were associated with a statistically higher risk of coronary events. Shift work was not associated with increased rates of mortality (whether vascular cause specific or overall). Presence or absence of adjustment for smoking and socioeconomic status was not a source of heterogeneity in the primary studies. 6598 myocardial infarctions, 17,359 coronary events, and 1854 ischaemic strokes occurred. On the basis of the Canadian prevalence of shift work of 32.8%, the population attributable risks related to shift work were 7.0% for myocardial infarction, 7.3% for all coronary events, and 1.6% for ischaemic stroke.ConclusionsShift work is associated with vascular events, which may have implications for public policy and occupational medicine.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough studies have reported that certain sleep characteristics, such as sleep duration and sleep apnea, are linked to the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), this link remains contentious because of the limited evidence from individual studies. Furthermore, evidence indicated that shift work involving circadian disruption as a probable human carcinogen. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the associations between sleep duration, sleep apnea, and shift work with the risk of colorectal neoplasms, including CRC and colorectal adenoma (CRA).MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria were determined using PICOS principles. Observational studies reporting associations of sleep duration, sleep apnea, or shift work with risk of CRC or CRA were included. We assessed the risk of bias on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsA total of 18 observational studies were included. Of these studies, nine studies reported the effect of sleep duration on risk of colorectal neoplasms, five reported the effect of sleep apnea, and six reported the effect of shift work. The relative risk (RR) for colorectal neoplasms was 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94, 1.20] in the short sleep duration group compared with the moderate sleep duration group. Long sleep duration was associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasms (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.65). The pooled results showed that sleep apnea was associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasms (RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.56, 1.97). Furthermore, results showed that the association between shift work and the risk of colorectal neoplasms was not significant (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.17). No publication bias was observed in all the analyses (all P>0.05). The sensitivity analysis showed that no individual study substantially influenced the pooled RRs for colorectal neoplasms and CRC.ConclusionsOur findings suggest the significant positive association of long sleep duration and sleep apnea with risk of colorectal neoplasms and CRC. Given that sleep characteristics may be a potentially modifiable risk factor for colorectal neoplasms, further understanding of its role in carcinogenesis will provide valuable insight for cancer prevention.

Dataset Information

Shift work and risk of skin cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

Shift work and risk of skin cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets