Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Health shocks, medical insurance and household vulnerability: Evidence from South Africa.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:South Africa has a dual system of healthcare model differentiated across socio-economic lines. While on the one hand there exists high quality private facilities that is expensive and accessible to the minority, on the other is the free but stretched and over-crowded public healthcare that the rest of the population relies on. Accessing private facilities requires private medical insurance or requires coping strategies that can lead to household vulnerability. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study is to analyse the relationship between health shocks and household vulnerability in the South African context of high poverty and low medical insurance penetration rate. DATA:The study employs data from waves three to five of South Africa's nationally representative National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) conducted between the period 2012-2017 in approximately two-year intervals. METHODS:Using food expenditure shock as an indicator for vulnerability, the study utilises a range of econometric techniques from panel logit regression to quasi-experimental design based difference in difference regressions to assess the association between health shocks, medical insurance and household vulnerability. FINDINGS:The main finding of the study is that a significant proportion of households in the upper income quintile utilise private healthcare even when not covered by private medical insurance. This preference for private over public health facilities make them vulnerable to health shocks as they cope by sacrificing food consumption to incur additional health expenditure. In contrast, lower income households that are unable to access the high-cost private healthcare tend to rely on the strained public healthcare system. They are not able to use their constrained food expenditure as a coping strategy for private or out-of-pocket medical expenses because their food consumption is already at a bare minimum. CONCLUSION:The results confirm that access to quality healthcare is a privilege in South Africa, available only to the minority of the population. The study paints a grim picture of household vulnerability in South Africa and underlines the need for a National Health Insurance that would enable universal access to quality healthcare in the country.

SUBMITTER: Morudu P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7006899 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Health shocks, medical insurance and household vulnerability: Evidence from South Africa.

Morudu Pheeha P   Kollamparambil Umakrishnan U  

PloS one 20200207 2


<h4>Background</h4>South Africa has a dual system of healthcare model differentiated across socio-economic lines. While on the one hand there exists high quality private facilities that is expensive and accessible to the minority, on the other is the free but stretched and over-crowded public healthcare that the rest of the population relies on. Accessing private facilities requires private medical insurance or requires coping strategies that can lead to household vulnerability.<h4>Objective</h4  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3419891 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6794569 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4803089 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7250410 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8130397 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8173599 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5832606 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8376031 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6660462 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3765324 | biostudies-literature