Recognition of 1,N 2-ethenoguanine by alkyladenine DNA glycosylase is restricted by a conserved active-site residue.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The adenine, cytosine, and guanine bases of DNA are susceptible to alkylation by the aldehyde products of lipid peroxidation and by the metabolic byproducts of vinyl chloride pollutants. The resulting adducts spontaneously cyclize to form harmful etheno lesions. Cells employ a variety of DNA repair pathways to protect themselves from these pro-mutagenic modifications. Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) is thought to initiate base excision repair of both 1,N 6-ethenoadenine (?A) and 1,N 2-ethenoguanine (?G). However, it is not clear how AAG might accommodate ?G in an active site that is complementary to ?A. This prompted a thorough investigation of AAG-catalyzed excision of ?G from several relevant contexts. Using single-turnover and multiple-turnover kinetic analyses, we found that ?G in its natural ?G·C context is very poorly recognized relative to ?A·T. Bulged and mispaired ?G contexts, which can form during DNA replication, were similarly poor substrates for AAG. Furthermore, AAG could not recognize an ?G site in competition with excess undamaged DNA sites. Guided by previous structural studies, we hypothesized that Asn-169, a conserved residue in the AAG active-site pocket, contributes to discrimination against ?G. Consistent with this model, the N169S variant of AAG was 7-fold more active for excision of ?G compared with the wildtype (WT) enzyme. Taken together, these findings suggest that ?G is not a primary substrate of AAG, and that current models for etheno lesion repair in humans should be revised. We propose that other repair and tolerance mechanisms operate in the case of ?G lesions.
SUBMITTER: Thelen AZ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7008384 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA