Dataset Information

Prognostic role of body composition parameters in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients from the EXPAND trial.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Body fat and/or muscle composition influences prognosis in several cancer types. For advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer, we investigated which body composition parameters carry prognostic information beyond well-established clinical parameters using robust model selection strategy such that parameters identified can be expected to generalize and to be reproducible beyond our particular data set. Then we modelled how differences in these parameters translate into survival outcomes. METHODS:Fat and muscle parameters were measured on baseline computed tomography scans in 761 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer from the phase III EXPAND trial, undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) included body composition parameters and clinical prognostic factors. All continuous variables were entered linearly into the model as there was no evidence of non-linear prognostic impact. For transferability, the final model included only parameters that were picked by Bayesian information criterion model selection followed by bootstrap analysis to identify the most robust model. RESULTS:Muscle and fat parameters formed correlation clusters without relevant between-cluster correlation. Mean muscle attenuation (MA) clusters with the fat parameters. In multivariate analysis, MA was prognostic for OS (P < 0.0001) but not for PFS, while skeletal muscle index was prognostic for PFS (P = 0.02) but not for OS. Worse performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG 1/0), younger age (on a linear scale), and the number of metastatic sites were strong negative clinical prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. MA remained in the model for OS (P = 0.0001) following Bayesian information criterion model selection in contrast to skeletal muscle index that remained prognostic for PFS (P = 0.009). Applying stricter criteria for transferability, MA represented the only prognostic body composition parameter for OS, selected in >80% of bootstrap replicates. Finally, Cox model-derived survival curves indicated that large differences in MA translate into only moderate differences in expected OS in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS:Among body composition parameters, only MA has robust prognostic impact for OS. Data suggest that treatment approaches targeting muscle quality are unlikely to prolong OS noticeably on their own in advanced gastric cancer patients, indicating that multimodal approaches should be pursued in the future.

SUBMITTER: Hacker UT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7015239 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic role of body composition parameters in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients from the EXPAND trial.

Hacker Ulrich T UT Hasenclever Dirk D Linder Nicolas N Stocker Gertraud G Chung Hyun-Cheol HC Kang Yoon-Koo YK Moehler Markus M Busse Harald H Lordick Florian F

Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 20190828 1

<h4>Background</h4>Body fat and/or muscle composition influences prognosis in several cancer types. For advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer, we investigated which body composition parameters carry prognostic information beyond well-established clinical parameters using robust model selection strategy such that parameters identified can be expected to generalize and to be reproducible beyond our particular data set. Then we modelled how differences in these parameters translate ...[more]

PMID: 31464089

Similar Datasets

Project description:Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancers carry a poor prognosis, and despite recent advancements, most patients die of their disease. Although immune checkpoint blockade became part of the standard-of-care for patients with metastatic G/GEJ cancers, its efficacy and impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) in early disease remain largely unknown. We hypothesized higher efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with nonmetastatic G/GEJ cancer. In the phase 2 PANDA trial, patients with previously untreated resectable G/GEJ tumors (n = 21) received neoadjuvant treatment with one cycle of atezolizumab monotherapy followed by four cycles of atezolizumab plus docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine. Treatment was well tolerated. There were grade 3 immune-related adverse events in two of 20 patients (10%) but no grade 4 or 5 immune-related adverse events, and all patients underwent resection without treatment-related delays, meeting the primary endpoint of safety and feasibility. Tissue was obtained at multiple time points, allowing analysis of the effects of single-agent anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the subsequent combination with chemotherapy on the TME. Twenty of 21 patients underwent surgery and were evaluable for secondary pathologic response and survival endpoints, and 19 were evaluable for exploratory translational analyses. A major pathologic response (≤10% residual viable tumor) was observed in 14 of 20 (70%, 95% confidence interval 46-88%) patients, including 9 (45%, 95% confidence interval 23-68%) pathologic complete responses. At a median follow-up of 47 months, 13 of 14 responders were alive and disease-free, and five of six nonresponders had died as a result of recurrence. Notably, baseline anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)+CD8+ T cell infiltration was significantly higher in responders versus nonresponders, and comparison of TME alterations following anti-PD-L1 monotherapy versus the subsequent combination with chemotherapy showed an increased immune activation on single-agent PD-1/L1 axis blockade. On the basis of these data, monotherapy anti-PD-L1 before its combination with chemotherapy warrants further exploration and validation in a larger cohort of patients with nonmetastatic G/GEJ cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03448835 .

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the effect of body composition on the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy has not been reported.MethodsThe computed tomography (CT) images and clinicopathological data of 101 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NCI) from 2019 to 2021 were collected. The CT image of L3 vertebral body section was selected, and the body composition before and after the neoadjuvant treatment was calculated using the SliceOmatic software, mainly including skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous adipose index (SAI), and visceral adipose index (VAI). The relationship between body composition and the efficacy and adverse events of NCI was analyzed.ResultsOf the 101 patients, 81 with evaluable data were included in the analysis. Of the included patients, 77.8% were male; the median age of all the patients was 62 years, and the median neoadjuvant therapy cycle was three. After the neoadjuvant therapy, 62.9% of the tumors were in remission (residual tumor cells ≤ 50%), and 37.1% of the tumors had no remission (residual tumor cells>50%). Moreover, 61.7% of the patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and 18.5% had immune-related adverse events (irAEs). After neoadjuvant therapy, the body mass index (from 23 to 22.6 cm2/m2, p=0.042), SAI (from 34.7 to 32.9 cm2/m2, p=0.01) and VAI (from 32.4 to 26.8 cm2/m2, p=0.005) were significantly lower than those before treatment, while the SMI had no significant change (44.7 vs 42.5 cm2/m2, p=0.278). The multivariate logistics regression analysis revealed that low SMI (odds ratio [OR]: 3.23,95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-9.81, p=0.047), SMI attenuation (△SMI) ≥ 1.8(OR: 1.45,95%CI: 1.20-3.48, p=0.048), and clinical node positivity (OR: 6.99,95%CI: 2.35-20.82, p=0.001) were independent risk factors for non-remission. Additionally, high SAI is an independent risk factor for irAEs (OR: 14, 95%CI: 1.73-112.7, p=0.013).ConclusionLow SMI and △SMI≥1.8 are independent risk factors for poor tumor regression in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving NCI. Patients with a high SAI are more likely to develop irAEs.

Dataset Information

Prognostic role of body composition parameters in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients from the EXPAND trial.

Publications

Prognostic role of body composition parameters in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients from the EXPAND trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets