Dataset Information

Clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

As the therapy of acupuncture continues to expand, electroacupuncture is increasing used in allergic rhinitis prevention and therapy, and many studies have published that it is effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, it is unclear if electroacupuncture provides an evidence-based clinical benefit in the allergic rhinitis population.

Methods/design

We will conduct a systematic review of electroacupuncture and health-related outcomes in allergic rhinitis patients according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews. The primary objective is to assess the impact of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on clinical outcomes relevant to allergic rhinitis patients, such as effective rate, life-quality evaluation, and adverse events. The Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool will be used to assess the quality of eligible studies according to the Cochrane handbook.

Results

We will perform a meta-analysis using standard techniques for the outcomes.

Conclusion

The results of this systematic review may highlight the gaps in our knowledge of the relevance of electroacupuncture after treatment or after follow-ups.PROSPERO registration number: PROSPERO CRD42018104080. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails).

SUBMITTER: Fu L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7015649 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review.

Fu Li L Zhong Juan J Fu Qinwei Q Yang Yepeng Y Zhang Mengni M Zhang Qinxiu Q

Medicine 20200201 6

<h4>Background</h4>As the therapy of acupuncture continues to expand, electroacupuncture is increasing used in allergic rhinitis prevention and therapy, and many studies have published that it is effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, it is unclear if electroacupuncture provides an evidence-based clinical benefit in the allergic rhinitis population.<h4>Methods/design</h4>We will conduct a systematic review of electroacupuncture and health-related outcomes in allergic rhinitis ...[more]

PMID: 32028401

Similar Datasets

Project description:Bilastine is a non-sedating second generation H1 oral antihistamine (OAH) for treating allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. The effect of bilastine has not previously been evaluated in a meta-analysis. The aim of this review was to determine the efficacy and safety of bilastine in treating AR. An electronic literature search was performed using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Science Direct and Google Scholar up to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing bilastine with placebo and standard pharmacotherapy were included. The included studies must have diagnosis of AR established by clinicians and the outcomes must have a minimum of 2 weeks of follow-up period. The primary outcomes assessed were total symptom score (TSS), nasal symptom score (NSS) and non-nasal symptom score (NNSS). The secondary outcomes were discomfort due to rhinitis, quality of life (QOL) and adverse events. The risk of bias and quality of evidence for all studies were appraised. The meta-analysis was done using Review Manager 5.3 software based on the random-effects model. The search identified 135 records after removal of duplicates. Following screening and review of the records, fifteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Five trials involving 3,329 patients met the inclusion criteria. Bilastine was superior to placebo in improving TSS, NSS, NNSS, rhinitis discomfort score and QOL but has comparable efficacy with other OAHs in TSS, NSS, NNS, rhinitis discomfort score and QOL. There was no difference in adverse effects when bilastine was compared against placebo and other OAHs except for somnolence. Bilastine has fewer incidence of somnolence compared to cetirizine. The overall quality of evidence ranged from moderate to high quality. Bilastine is effective and safe in treating the overall symptoms of AR with comparable efficacy and safety with other OAHs except somnolence. Whilst bilastine has similar efficacy to cetirizine, somnolence is notably less in bilastine.

Dataset Information

Clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review.

Background

Methods/design

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets