Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Use of DIAGNOdent and VistaProof in diagnostic of Pre-Cavitated Caries Lesions-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To analyse the published evidence of the validity of DIAGNDOdent and VistaProof in diagnosing carious depths in pre-cavitated lesions. Material and methods: A systematic review was carried out after identifying a total of 184 articles, including 27 concerning the qualitative review and a subsequent meta-analysis. The quality of the studies was evaluated by using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: For DIAGNOdent, the sensitivity value was 0.77, the specificity value was 0.75 and AUC was 0.81 for the global meta-analyses. In relation to subgroups, the values estimated 0.85, 0.76 and 0.86, respectively, for the in vivo group and 0.71, 0.75 and 0.83 for the in vitro group. For VistaProof, sensitivity was 0.81, specificity 0.75 and AUC had a value of 0.80 in the global meta-analysis. For the subgroups, these were considered at 0.75, 0.81 and 0.89, respectively, for the in vivo group and 0.91, 0.74 and 0.76 for the in vitro group. Neither case presented publication bias when analysing the funnel plot, the classic fail-safe number and Egger's intercept. Conclusion: Both VistaProof and DIAGNOdent are valid as they offer a moderate to high diagnostic effectiveness for dentine depth in pre-cavitated lesions.

SUBMITTER: Iranzo-Cortes JE 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7019252 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Use of DIAGNOdent and VistaProof in diagnostic of Pre-Cavitated Caries Lesions-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Iranzo-Cortés José Enrique JE   Montiel-Company José María JM   Almerich-Torres Teresa T   Bellot-Arcís Carlos C   Almerich-Silla José Manuel JM  

Journal of clinical medicine 20191219 1


<h4>Objective</h4>To analyse the published evidence of the validity of DIAGNDOdent and VistaProof in diagnosing carious depths in pre-cavitated lesions. <b>Material and methods:</b> A systematic review was carried out after identifying a total of 184 articles, including 27 concerning the qualitative review and a subsequent meta-analysis. The quality of the studies was evaluated by using the QUADAS-2 tool. <b>Results:</b> For DIAGNOdent, the sensitivity value was 0.77, the specificity value was 0  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8342337 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8531083 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7011515 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6304695 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5855295 | biostudies-literature