Dataset Information

[Which Spanish journals are read and how Primary Care doctors keep informed].

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To determine which medical journals are read by Primary Care doctors, their language preferences, publication format and the ways of accessing them. DESIGN:Telephone interview. LOCATION:All the autonomous communities of Spain. PARTICIPANTS:A total of 300 Primary Care physicians selected by proportional stratified sampling by autonomous community and type of professional (general practitioners and paediatricians). MEASURES:A structured 18-question survey on reading habits administered by telephone using computer-assisted techniques. RESULTS:Respondents declared they preferably read specialty journals and are inclined to the printed format, although the online version is the option of younger doctors and paediatricians. The general practitioners prefer to read case studies (73%) and paediatricians opt for the reviews (74%). Overall, 48% read 1 to 4 articles per week. The search tools preferred by 70% of respondents were Google and Yahoo, followed by databases (29%). Eighty eight per cent stated an interest in having a free online service to find quality Spanish journals. As regards language, 80% find it more useful to read articles in Spanish than in English, and 70% believe that there are no quality differences between the publications in both languages. CONCLUSIONS:The publications in Spanish are used as the preferred sources of information by a high percentage of Primary Care physicians. These professionals believe that Spanish-language databases make it easier to access these publications, and are useful and necessary for professional practice.

SUBMITTER: Gonzalez de Dios J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7025152 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

[Which Spanish journals are read and how Primary Care doctors keep informed].

González de Dios Javier J Canoura Angeles Flores AF Villa Josep Jiménez JJ Fuentes José Antonio Gutiérrez JA

Atencion primaria 20110602 12

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine which medical journals are read by Primary Care doctors, their language preferences, publication format and the ways of accessing them.<h4>Design</h4>Telephone interview.<h4>Location</h4>All the autonomous communities of Spain.<h4>Participants</h4>A total of 300 Primary Care physicians selected by proportional stratified sampling by autonomous community and type of professional (general practitioners and paediatricians).<h4>Measures</h4>A structured 18-question sur ...[more]

PMID: 21640438

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIncreasingly, consultations in health care settings are conducted remotely using a range of communication technologies. Email allows for 2-way text-based communication, occurring asynchronously. Studies have explored the content and nature of email consultations to understand the use, structure, and function of email consultations. Most previous content analyses of email consultations in primary care settings have been conducted in North America, and these have shown that concerns and assumptions about how email consultations work have not been realized. There has not been a UK-based content analysis of email consultations.ObjectiveThis study aims to explore and delineate the content of consultations conducted via email in English general practice by conducting a content analysis of email consultations between general practitioners (GPs) and patients.MethodsWe conducted a content analysis of anonymized email consultations between GPs and patients in 2 general practices in the United Kingdom. We examined the descriptive elements of the correspondence to ascertain when the emails were sent, the number of emails in an email consultation, and the nature of the content. We used a normative approach to analyze the content of the email consultations to explore the use and function of email consultation.ResultsWe obtained 100 email consultations from 85 patients, which totaled 262 individual emails. Most email users were older than 40 years, and over half of the users were male. The email consultations were mostly short and completed in a few days. Emails were mostly sent and received during the day. The emails were mostly clinical in content rather than administrative and covered a wide range of clinical presentations. There were 3 key themes to the use and function of the email consultations: the role of the GP and email consultation, the transactional nature of an email consultation, and the operationalization of an email consultation.ConclusionsMost cases where emails are used to have a consultation with a patient in general practice have a shorter consultation, are clinical in nature, and are resolved quickly. GPs approach email consultations using key elements similar to that of the face-to-face consultation; however, using email consultations has the potential to alter the role of the GP, leading them to engage in more administrative tasks than usual. Email consultations were not a replacement for face-to-face consultations.

Project description:AimTo apply the drug utilisation 90% (DU90%) indicator (the number of unique drugs which makes up 90% of a doctor's prescribing) to general practitioner (GP) practices prescribing in England to examine time trends, practice-level variation, and relationships with practice characteristics, prescribing costs and low-value prescribing.Study designRetrospective cohort study.SettingPrimary care in England, using publicly available prescribing data available from the National Health Service (NHS) digital platform for 2013-2017.ParticipantsAll general practices in England (n=7620).Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe DU90% was calculated on an annual basis for each practice based on medication British National Formulary codes. Low-value prescribing was defined using NHS 2017 guidance (including lidocaine plasters, liothyronine, omega-3 supplements). Descriptive statistics were generated per year on time trends and practice-level variation in the DU90%. Multilevel linear regression was used to examine the practice characteristics (relating to staff, patients and deprivation of the practice area).ResultsAmong 7620 practices, mean DU90% ranged from 130.0 to 131.0 across study years, and regarding variation between practices, there was a 1.4-fold difference between the lowest and highest 5% of practices. A range of medications were included in the DU90% of virtually all practices, including atorvastatin, levothyroxine, omeprazole, ramipril, amlodipine, simvastatin and aspirin. A higher volume of prescribing was associated with a lower DU90%, while having more patients, higher proportions of patients who are women or aged ≥45 years, higher number of GPs working in the practice and being in a more deprived area were associated with a higher DU90%. Practices in higher quintiles of DU90% had higher levels of low-priority prescribing and prescribing costs.ConclusionGP practices typically use 130 different medications in the bulk of their prescribing. Higher DU90% was associated with higher levels of low-priority prescribing and prescribing costs. Increasing use of personal formularies may enhance prescribing quality and reduce costs.

Dataset Information

[Which Spanish journals are read and how Primary Care doctors keep informed].

Publications

[Which Spanish journals are read and how Primary Care doctors keep informed].

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets