Dataset Information

Comparison of clinic-radiological outcome of cross pinning versus lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children: A randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: Introduction:Supracondylar fracture of humerus (SFH) is frequently encountered in the immature skeleton, [1] predominantly in the non-dominant extremity. Aim:This study compared the clinic-radiological outcome between cross pinning with lateral pinning for fixation of displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. Materials and methods:All eligible patients were randomized into two groups, group I for lateral pinning and group II for cross pinning. Before passing medial pin in group II a stab incision was given to visualise the medial epicondyle. Patients were followed up on 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. Final outcome was measured in terms of clinic-radiological union, Baumann angle, loss of reduction, stability of fracture fixation, incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury and Flynn's score. Results: There were 37 patients in group I and 40 in group II. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic details. At the final outcome there were no difference in between the groups in terms of all radiological and clinical outcome. Two patients of group I developed delay ulnar neuritis, which resolve completely in subsequent follow-up. Conclusion:Both techniques provide stable fixation, union and good functional outcome without iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury provided that small incision sufficient enough to identify the medial epicondyle is given with passing of medial pin.

SUBMITTER: Afaque SF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7026539 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar-Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of clinic-radiological outcome of cross pinning versus lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children: A randomized controlled trial.

Afaque Syed Faisal SF Singh Ajai A Maharjan Rajiv R Ranjan Rahul R Panda Anil Kumar AK Mishra Amitosh A

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 20190115 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>Supracondylar fracture of humerus (SFH) is frequently encountered in the immature skeleton, [1] predominantly in the non-dominant extremity.<h4>Aim</h4>This study compared the clinic-radiological outcome between cross pinning with lateral pinning for fixation of displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>All eligible patients were randomized into two groups, group I for lateral pinning and group II for cross pinning. Before passing ...[more]

PMID: 32099290

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective The incidence of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in flexion-type supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) in children is significantly higher than that of extension-type fractures. This study aimed to identify risk factors for ORIF in flexion-type SCHF. Methods One hundred seventy-one patients with Wilkins type III flexion-type SCHF from January 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled in a tertiary paediatric hospital. Patients were divided into ORIF group versus closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) group. Then, patients data of age, sex, injury side, obesity, deviation of displacement, fracture level, rotation, nerve injury, and delay from injury to surgery were reviewed. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors and odds ratios (OR) of ORIF. Results Overall, 171 children with type III flexion-type SCHF were analyzed (average aged 7.9 ± 2.8 years). Displacement was lateral in 151 cases, medial in 20. 20 cases had combined ulnar nerve injury. The failed closed reduction rate was 20%. Univariate analysis indicated age, distal fracture fragment rotation, and ulnar nerve injury were significantly associated with ORIF. (P = 0.047, P = 0.009, and P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that distal fracture fragment rotation (OR, 3.3; 95%CI:1.1–9.5; P = 0.028) and ulnar nerve injury (OR, 6.4; 95%CI:2.3–18.3; P = 0.001) were independent risk factors; however, the age was not an independent one (OR, 1.5; 95%CI:0.6–3.5; P = 0.397) for ORIF in the Wilkins type III flexion-type SCHF. Conclusion Distal fracture fragment malrotation on initial x-rays and ulnar nerve injury were significant risk factors for ORIF in Wilkins type III flexion-type SCHF. Surgeons should prepare tourniquets or other open reduction instruments when treating these types of fractures. Level of evidence Level IV Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05798-5.

Project description:BackgroundTreatment of lateral fractures of the clavicle is challenging and has been controversially discussed for a long time due to high non-union rates in non-operative treatment and high complication rates in surgical treatment. Acromioclavicular joint instability due to the injury of the closely neighbored coraco-clavicular ligaments can result in a cranialization of the medial clavicle shaft. A recently developed implant showed a promising functional outcome in a small collective of patients.MethodsIn this prospective study, 20 patients with a mean age of 40.7 ± 11.3 years with a dislocated fracture of the lateral clavicle (Jäger&Breitner I-III, Neer I-III) were enrolled. All patients were surgically treated using the locking compression plate (LCP) for the superior anterior clavicle (Synthes®). Functional outcome was recorded using the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) allowing for qualitative self-assessment of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and of the Constant Score. Acromioclavicular joint stability was evaluated using the Taft-Score.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 14.2 ± 4.0 months. The mean MSQ was 87.0 ± 7.4 points, the mean SPADI 91.1 ± 11.3 points, the mean DASH score 7.6 ± 7.3 points and the mean normative age- and sex-specific Constant Score 85.6 ± 8.0 points. The mean Taft Score resulted in 10.7 ± 1.0 points. The mean Taft Score in lateral clavicular fractures with fracture gap between the coracoclavicular ligaments in combination with a rupture of the conoid ligament (J&B II a, Neer II B; n =11) was with 10.3 ± 0.9 points significantly lower than the mean Taft Score of all other types of lateral clavicle fractures (J&B I, II b, III; n =9) which resulted in 11.3 ± 0.9 points (p<0.05).ConclusionsThe Synthes® LCP superior anterior clavicle plate allows for a safe stabilization and good functional outcome with high patient satisfaction in fractures of the lateral clavicle. However, in fractures type Jäger&Breitner II a, Neer II B a significant acromioclavicular joint instability was observed and additional reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments should be performed.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02256059. Registered 02 October 2014.

Project description:PurposeThe presence of soft tissue injury in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) has been shown to be an independent predictor of any neurovascular injury. Potentially expanding this concept, the specific neurovascular structure injured around the elbow is thought to be dependent upon the direction and magnitude of fracture displacement and subsequent soft tissue injury. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the bruise location following SCHF is indicative of the anatomic location of maximal soft tissue injury and therefore is a specific prognosticator of which neurovascular structure may be injured.MethodsRetrospective chart review of all SCHFs treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2007 to 2017 collected information on bruise location, neurovascular injury patterns, and outcomes. Bruise location was classified as anterior, anterolateral, anteromedial, or posterior. Injury radiographs were reviewed by a blinded pediatric orthopaedic surgeon to neurovascular structure injured.ResultsOf 2845 SCHFs identified, 267 (9.4%) had concomitant neurovascular injury-of which 128 (47.9%) met inclusion criteria. Among the vascular injuries, all bruising was anteromedial (28/45, 62.2%, P<0.05) or anterior (17/45, 37.8%, P>0.05). Fractures with anteromedial bruising correlated with median nerve injury (24/27, 88.9%, P<0.05), whereas fractures with anterolateral bruising correlated with radial nerve injuries (24/25, 96.0%, P<0.05). Bruising or radiographic evaluation correctly identified 60.2% and 64.1% of neurovascular injuries, respectively, whereas the combination identified 82.0% of neurovascular injuries correctly. Bruise location identified 23 neurovascular injuries not predicted by radiographic evaluation alone.ConclusionBruise location is an important physical examination finding that can be used as an adjunct to improve the diagnostic accuracy of neurovascular injury in SCHFs in conjunction with neurovascular physical examination and radiographic evaluation. SCHFs with anterior or anteromedial bruising should raise concern for vascular injury. In addition, anteromedial bruising is predictive of a median nerve injury and anterolateral bruising is predictive of radial nerve injury. This adjunct diagnostic is particularly helpful in a noncooperative child or if performed by a clinician with limited experience in diagnosing neurovascular injuries or interpreting pediatric elbow radiographs.Level of evidenceLevel IV, case series.

Dataset Information

Comparison of clinic-radiological outcome of cross pinning versus lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children: A randomized controlled trial.

Publications

Comparison of clinic-radiological outcome of cross pinning versus lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children: A randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets