Dataset Information

Results of Modified Ponseti Technique in Difficult Clubfoot and a review of literature.

ABSTRACT: Introduction:Serial Ponseti casting achieves deformity correction in early presenting idiopathic clubfoot cases normally in around 7 casts. However, there are resistant patients where correction requires more casts than usual. In such patients a modification in standard technique might be required right from the beginning. Such patients were collectively called as difficult clubfoot. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of our modification to Ponseti technique in difficult clubfoot. Methods:All idiopathic clubfoot cases who were 75th percentile or more in WHO age for weight chart (chubby infants) or untreated clubfoot patients presenting for first time to our clinic at more than 5 months age (late presenters and neglected cases) were included in the study. Patients who had been previously surgically intervened elsewhere, patients over 7 years of age, patients with syndromic clubfoot or clubfoot associated with neurological conditions were excluded from the study. The patients were treated by early tenotomy of tendoachillis and a plantar fascia release before starting serial casting by Ponseti technique. Post correction, strict bracing protocol was followed with regular follow up. Pirani scoring was done at each stage. Measurement of Talocalcaneal angle on AP radiograph, maximum degree of abduction and dorsiflexion was noted once every year. Results:There were total 28 patients in our study. In all, 47 feet were subjected to modified Ponseti protocol. There were 21 male patients. Median age at presentation was 4 months. Mean centile of weight for age as per WHO growth chart was 64. Mean Pirani score at presentation was 5.86 (S.D.?±?0.34). Mean number of casts required for correction was 3.75?±?1.10. Maximum followup period was 25 months. Conclusion:This modification of Ponseti casting for difficult clubfoot patients achieves correction in shorter duration with less number of casts.

SUBMITTER: Agarwal A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7026550 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar-Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Results of Modified Ponseti Technique in <i>Difficult Clubfoot</i> and a review of literature.

Agarwal Ankur A Gupta Sumit S Sud Alok A Agarwal Sheetal S

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 20190507 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>Serial Ponseti casting achieves deformity correction in early presenting idiopathic clubfoot cases normally in around 7 casts. However, there are resistant patients where correction requires more casts than usual. In such patients a modification in standard technique might be required right from the beginning. Such patients were collectively called as <i>difficult clubfoot.</i> The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of our modification to Ponseti technique in <i>dif ...[more]

PMID: 32099284

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCongenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), also known as clubfoot, is common congenital orthopedic foot deformity in children characterized by four components of foot deformities: hindfoot equinus, hindfoot varus, midfoot cavus, and forefoot adduction. Although a number of conservative and surgical methods have been proposed to correct the clubfoot deformity, the relapses of the clubfoot are not uncommon. Several previous literatures discussed about the technical details of Ponseti method, adherence of Ponseti protocol among walking age or older children. However there is a necessity to investigate the relapse pattern, compliance of bracing, number of casts used in treatment and the percentages of surgical referral under two years of age for clear understanding and better practice to achieve successful outcome without or reduce relapse. Therefore this study aims to review the current evidence of Ponseti method (manipulation, casting, percutaneous Achilles tenotomy, and bracing) in the management of clubfoot under two years of age.Materials and methodsArticles were searched from 2000 to 2015, in the following databases to identify the effectiveness of Ponseti method treatment for clubfoot: Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL), PubMed, and Scopus. The database searches were limited to articles published in English, and articles were focused on the effectiveness of Ponseti method on children with less than 2 years of age.ResultsOf the outcome of 1095 articles from four electronic databases, twelve articles were included in the review. Pirani scoring system, Dimeglio scoring system, measuring the range of motion and rate of relapses were used as outcome measures.ConclusionsIn conclusion, all reviewed, 12 articles reported that Ponseti method is a very effective method to correct the clubfoot deformities. However, we noticed that relapses occur in nine studies, which is due to the non-adherence of bracing regime and other factors such as low income and social economic status.

Project description:Despite being recognized as the gold standard in isolated clubfoot treatment, the Ponseti casting method has yielded variable results. Few studies have directly compared common predictors of treatment failure between institutions with high versus low failure rates.We asked: (1) is the provider's rigid adherence to the Ponseti method associated with a lower likelihood of unplanned clubfoot surgery, and (2) at the institution that did not adhere rigidly to Ponseti's principles, are any demographic or treatment-related factors associated with increased likelihood of unplanned clubfoot surgery?After institutional review board approval, a consecutive series of patients with a diagnosis of isolated clubfoot who underwent treatment between January 2003 and December 2007 were identified. At Institution 1, 91 of 133 patients met the eligibility criteria and were followed for a minimum of 2 years compared with 58 of 58 patients at Institution 2. At Institution 1, 16 providers managed care using a conservative casting approach based on the Ponseti method. However, treatment was adapted by the provider(s). At Institution 2, one orthopaedic surgeon managed care with strict adherence to the Ponseti method. Surgical indications at both institutions included the presence of a persistent equinovarus foot position while standing. A chart review was used to collect data related to proportion of patients undergoing unplanned additional treatment for deformity recurrences after Ponseti casting, demographics, and treatment patterns.The proportion of subjects who underwent unplanned major surgical intervention was greater (odds ratio [OR], 51.1; 95% CI, 6.8-384.0; p < 0.001) at Institution 1 (60 of 131, 47%) compared with Institution 2 (two of 91, 2%). There was no difference (p = 0.200) in the proportion of patients who underwent additional casting, repeat tendo Achilles lengthening, and/or anterior tibialis tendon transfer only (minor recurrence) at Institution 1 (nine of 131, 7%) compared with Institution 2 (11 of 91, 13%). At Institution 1, an increase in the number of revision casts (multiple vs no casts, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.9; 95% CI, 2.0-7.6; p < 0.001) and an increase in the number of cast-related complications (multiple vs no complications, HR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.7; p = 0.019) were associated with increased risk of major surgery in the multivariate analysis.Rigid commitment to the Ponseti method in the conservative treatment of patients with isolated clubfoot was associated with a lower risk of subsequent unplanned surgical intervention. In addition, clubfoot treatment programs that use a care model that prioritizes continuity in care and dedication to the Ponseti method may decrease the proportion of patients who undergo unplanned surgical intervention.Level III, therapeutic study.

Project description:BACKGROUND:There are various established scoring systems to assess the outcome of clubfoot treatment after correction with the Ponseti method. We used five measures to compare the results in a cohort of children followed up for between 3.5 to 5?years. METHODS:In January 2017 two experienced physiotherapists assessed children who had started treatment between 2011 and 2013 in one clinic in Harare, Zimbabwe. The length of time in treatment was documented. The Roye score, Bangla clubfoot assessment tool, the Assessing Clubfoot Treatment (ACT) tool, proportion of relapsed and of plantigrade feet were used to assess the outcome of treatment in the cohort. Inter-observer variation was calculated for the two physiotherapists. A comparative analysis of the entire cohort, the children who had completed casting and the children who completed more than two years of bracing was undertaken. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for the five measures and compared to full clinical assessment (gold standard) and whether referral for further intervention was required for re-casting or surgical review. RESULTS:31% (68/218) of the cohort attended for examination and were assessed. Of the children who were assessed, 24 (35%) had attended clinic reviews for 4-5?years, and 30 (44%) for less than 2?years. There was good inter-observer agreement between the two expert physiotherapists on all assessment tools. Overall success of treatment varied between 56 and 93% using the different outcome measures. The relapse assessment had the highest unnecessary referrals (19.1%), and the Roye score the highest proportion of missed referrals (22.7%). The ACT and Bangla score missed the fewest number of referrals (7.4%). The Bangla score demonstrated 79.2% (95%CI: 57.8-92.9%) sensitivity and 79.5% (95%CI: 64.7-90.2%) specificity and the ACT score had 79.2% (95%CI: 57.8-92.9%) sensitivity and 100% (95%CI: 92-100%) specificity in predicting the need for referral. CONCLUSION:At three to five years of follow up, the Ponseti method has a good success rate that improves if the child has completed casting and at least two years of bracing. The ACT score demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for the need for referral for further intervention (specialist opinion or further casting). All tools demonstrated good reliability.

Project description:Background:We aimed to develop and evaluate a tool for clubfoot therapists in low resource settings to assess the results of Ponseti treatment of congenital talipes equinovarus, or clubfoot, in children of walking age. Method:A literature review and a Delphi process based on the opinions of 35 Ponseti trainers in Africa were used to develop the Assessing Clubfoot Treatment (ACT) tool and score. We followed up children with clubfoot from a cohort treated between 2011 and 2013, in 2017. A full clinical assessment was conducted to decide if treatment was successful or if further treatment was required. The ACT score was then calculated for each child. Inter-observer variation for the ACT tool was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the ACT score compared to full clinical assessment (gold standard). Predictors of a successful outcome were explored. Results:The follow up rate was 31.2% (68 children). The ACT tool consisted of 4 questions; each scored from 0 to 3, giving a total from 0 to 12 where 12 is the ideal result. The 4 questions included one physical assessment and three parent reported outcome measures. It took 5 min to administer and had excellent inter-observer agreement.An ACT score of 8 or less demonstrated 79% sensitivity and 100% specificity in identifying children that required further intervention, with a positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 90%. Children who completed two or more years of bracing were four times more likely to achieve an ACT score of 9 or more compared to those who did not (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.31-12.65, p = 0.02). Conclusions:The ACT tool is simple to administer, had excellent observer agreement, and good sensitivity and specificity in identifying children who need further intervention. The score can be used to identify those children who definitely need referral and further treatment (score 8 or less) and those with a definite successful outcome (score 11 or more), however further discrimination is needed to decide how to manage children with a borderline ACT score of 9 or 10. Level of evidence:Level II, Diagnostic Study.

Dataset Information

Results of Modified Ponseti Technique in Difficult Clubfoot and a review of literature.

Publications

Results of Modified Ponseti Technique in <i>Difficult Clubfoot</i> and a review of literature.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets