Dataset Information

Intrapulmonary concentrations of meropenem administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Optimal antimicrobial drug exposure in the lung is required for successful treatment outcomes for nosocomial pneumonia. Little is known about the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem when administered by continuous infusion (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the PK of two dosages of meropenem (3?g vs 6?g/day by CI) in the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia. METHODS:Thirty-one patients (81% male, median (IQR) age 72 (22) years) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Sixteen patients received 1?g/8?h and 15 2?g/8?h by CI (8?h infusion). Plasma and ELF meropenem concentrations were modeled using a population methodology, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of attaining (PTA) a free ELF concentration of 50% of time above MIC (50% fT>MIC), which results in logarithmic killing and the suppression of resistance in experimental models of pneumonia. RESULTS:The median (IQR) of meropenem AUC0-24 h in the plasma and ELF was 287.6 (190.2) and 84.1 (78.8) mg h/L in the 1?g/8?h group vs 448.1 (231.8) and 163.0 (201.8) mg h/L in the 2?g/8?h group, respectively. The penetration ratio was approximately 30% and was comparable between the dosage groups. In the Monte Carlo simulations, only the highest approved dose of meropenem of 2?g/8?h by CI allowed to achieve an optimal PTA for all isolates with a MIC

SUBMITTER: Benitez-Cano A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7026992 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Intrapulmonary concentrations of meropenem administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial.

Benítez-Cano Adela A Luque Sonia S Sorlí Luisa L Carazo Jesús J Ramos Isabel I Campillo Nuria N Curull Víctor V Sánchez-Font Albert A Vilaplana Carles C Horcajada Juan P JP Adalia Ramón R Bermejo Silvia S Samsó Enric E Hope William W Grau Santiago S

Critical care (London, England) 20200217 1

<h4>Background</h4>Optimal antimicrobial drug exposure in the lung is required for successful treatment outcomes for nosocomial pneumonia. Little is known about the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem when administered by continuous infusion (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the PK of two dosages of meropenem (3 g vs 6 g/day by CI) in the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia.<h4>Methods</h4>Thirty-one patients (81% ...[more]

PMID: 32066497

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMeropenem dosing for septic critically patients is difficult due to pathophysiological changes associated with sepsis as well as supportive symptomatic therapies. A prospective single-center study assessed whether fluid retention alters meropenem pharmacokinetics and the achievement of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets for efficacy.MethodsTwenty-five septic ICU patients (19 m, 6f) aged 32-86 years with the mean APACHE II score of 20.2 (range 11-33), suffering mainly from perioperative intra-abdominal or respiratory infections and septic shock (n = 18), were investigated over three days after the start of extended 3-h i.v. infusions of meropenem q8h. Urinary creatinine clearance (CLcr) and cumulative fluid balance (CFB) were measured daily. Plasma meropenem was measured, and Bayesian estimates of PK parameters were calculated.ResultsEleven patients (9 with peritonitis) were classified as fluid overload (FO) based on a positive day 1 CFB of more than 10% body weight. Compared to NoFO patients (n = 14, 11 with pneumonia), the FO patients had a lower meropenem clearance (CLme 8.5 ± 3.2 vs 11.5 ± 3.5 L/h), higher volume of distribution (V1 14.9 ± 3.5 vs 13.5 ± 4.1 L) and longer half-life (t1/2 1.4 ± 0.63 vs 0.92 ± 0.54 h) (p < 0.05). Over three days, the CFB of the FO patients decreased (11.7 ± 3.3 vs 6.7 ± 4.3 L, p < 0.05) and the PK parameters reached the values comparable with NoFO patients (CLme 12.4 ± 3.8 vs 11.5 ± 2.0 L/h, V1 13.7 ± 2.0 vs 14.0 ± 5.1 L, t1/2 0.81 ± 0.23 vs 0.87 ± 0.40 h). The CLcr and Cockroft-Gault CLcr were stable in time and comparable. The correlation with CLme was weak to moderate (CLcr, day 3 CGCLcr) or absent (day 1 and 2 CGCLcr). Dosing with 2 g meropenem q8h ensured adequate concentrations to treat infections with sensitive pathogens (MIC 2 mg/L). The proportion of pre-dose concentrations exceeding the MIC 8 mg/L and the fraction time with a target-exceeding concentration were higher in the FO group (day 1-3 f Cmin > MIC: 67 vs 27%, p < 0.001; day 1%f T > MIC: 79 ± 17 vs 58 ± 17, p < 0.05).ConclusionsThese findings emphasize the importance of TDM and a cautious approach to augmented maintenance dosing of meropenem to patients with FO infected with less susceptible pathogens, if guided by population covariate relationships between CLme and creatinine clearance.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Tigecycline is a vital antibiotic treatment option for infections caused by multiresistant bacteria in the intensive care unit (ICU). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in the ICU requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but pharmacokinetic data for tigecycline in patients receiving CRRT are lacking. METHODS:Eleven patients mainly with intra-abdominal infections receiving either continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD, n?=?8) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF, n?=?3) were enrolled, and plasma as well as effluent samples were collected according to a rich sampling schedule. Total and free tigecycline was determined by ultrafiltration and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-UV. Population pharmacokinetic modeling using NONMEM® 7.4 was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters as well as the clearance of CVVHD and CVVHDF. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses were performed to explore the potential need for dose adjustments of tigecycline in CRRT. RESULTS:A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was suitable to simultaneously describe the plasma PK and effluent measurements of tigecycline. Tigecycline dialysability was high, as indicated by the high mean saturation coefficients of 0.79 and 0.90 for CVVHD and CVVHDF, respectively, and in range of the concentration-dependent unbound fraction of tigecycline (45-94%). However, the contribution of CRRT to tigecycline clearance (CL) was only moderate (CLCVVHD: 1.69?L/h, CLCVVHDF: 2.71?L/h) in comparison with CLbody (physiological part of the total clearance) of 18.3?L/h. Bilirubin was identified as a covariate on CLbody in our collective, reducing the observed interindividual variability on CLbody from 58.6% to 43.6%. The probability of target attainment under CRRT for abdominal infections was ??0.88 for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ??0.5?mg/L and similar to patients without AKI. CONCLUSIONS:Despite high dialysability, dialysis clearance displayed only a minor contribution to tigecycline elimination, being in the range of renal elimination in patients without AKI. No dose adjustment of tigecycline seems necessary in CRRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION:EudraCT, 2012-005617-39 . Registered on 7 August 2013.

Project description:BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem, based on the population of critically ill adult patients undergoing CRRT. The secondary one was to examine the relationship between patient characteristics (covariates) and individual PK parameters. Finally, we aimed to perform Monte Carlo simulations to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) of %T?>?MIC considering the uncertainty of PK parameters.Materials and methodsThe study population included 19 adult critically ill patients on CRRT, receiving 1 g of meropenem in 1-h infusions every 8 h. Blood samples were collected prior to (time zero) and 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 480 min after the start of meropenem administration. Population nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was conducted using NONMEM software, Fortran, and Wings for NONMEM.ResultsA two-compartment model was used to describe the available data. Typical values of the central and peripheral volume of distribution, and the CRRT and inter-compartmental clearance for a theoretical patient with 24.6 g/l albumin concertation were V1?=?27.9 l, V2?=?33.7 l, ClCRRT?=?15.1 l/h, and Q?=?21.1 l/h. A significant covariate relationship between V1 and albumin concentration was observed in the data that was described by a power relationship with - 2.87 exponent. Subsequently performed Monte Carlo simulations of the model allowed us to assess the impact of albumin concentration on PTA. The 40%T?>?2 mg/l target was reached in more than 90% of subjects after 1-h infusion of 1000 mg q8h and steady-state conditions. The more stringent 100%T?>?2 mg/l target requires higher doses and/or longer infusion durations that depend on the albumin concentration.ConclusionsThe population PK model was successfully developed to describe the time course of meropenem concentrations. The hypoalbuminemia was found to be associated with higher PTA in the CRRT patients after multiple short-term infusions.

Dataset Information

Intrapulmonary concentrations of meropenem administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial.

Publications

Intrapulmonary concentrations of meropenem administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure