Dataset Information

During Cycling What Limits Maximum Mechanical Power Output at Cadences above 120 rpm?

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

A key determinant of muscle coordination and maximum power output during cycling is pedaling cadence. During cycling, the neuromuscular system may select from numerous solutions that solve the task demands while producing the same result. For more challenging tasks, fewer solutions will be available. Changes in the variability of individual muscle excitations (EMG) and multimuscle coordination, quantified by entropic half-life (EnHL), can reflect the number of solutions available at each system level. We, therefore, ask whether reduced variability in muscle coordination patterns occur at critical cadences and if they coincide with reduced variability in excitations of individual muscles.

Methods

Eleven trained cyclists completed an array of cadence-power output conditions. The EnHL of EMG intensity recorded from 10 leg muscles and EnHL of principal components describing muscle coordination were calculated. Multivariate adaptive regressive splines were used to determine the relationships between each EnHL and cycling condition or excitation characteristics (duration, duty cycle).

Results

Muscle coordination became more persistent at cadences up to 120 rpm, indicated by increasing EnHL values. Changes in EnHL at the level of the individual muscles differed from the changes in muscle coordination EnHL, with longer EnHL occurring at the slowest (<80 rpm) and fastest (>120 rpm) cadences. The EnHL of the main power producing muscles, however, reached a minimum by 80 rpm and did not change across the faster cadences studied.

Conclusions

Muscle coordination patterns, rather than the contribution of individual muscles, are key to power production at faster cadences in trained cyclists. Reductions in maximum power output at cadences above 120 rpm could be a function of the time available to coordinate orientation and transfer of forces to the pedals.

SUBMITTER: Hodson-Tole EF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7028473 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

During Cycling What Limits Maximum Mechanical Power Output at Cadences above 120 rpm?

Hodson-Tole Emma F EF Blake Ollie M OM Wakeling James M JM

Medicine and science in sports and exercise 20200101 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>A key determinant of muscle coordination and maximum power output during cycling is pedaling cadence. During cycling, the neuromuscular system may select from numerous solutions that solve the task demands while producing the same result. For more challenging tasks, fewer solutions will be available. Changes in the variability of individual muscle excitations (EMG) and multimuscle coordination, quantified by entropic half-life (EnHL), can reflect the number of solutions available ...[more]

PMID: 31389907

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMechanical power (MP) is the energy delivered to the respiratory system over time during mechanical ventilation. Our aim was to compare the currently available methods to calculate MP during volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation, comparing different equations with the geometric reference method, to understand whether the easier to use surrogate formulas were suitable for the everyday clinical practice. This would warrant a more widespread use of mechanical power to promote lung protection.MethodsForty respiratory failure patients, sedated and paralyzed for clinical reasons, were ventilated in volume-controlled ventilation, at two inspiratory flows (30 and 60 L/min), and pressure-controlled ventilation with a similar tidal volume. Mechanical power was computed both with the geometric method, as the area between the inspiratory limb of the airway pressure and the volume, and with two algebraic methods, a comprehensive and a surrogate formula.ResultsThe bias between the MP computed by the geometric method and by the comprehensive algebraic method during volume-controlled ventilation was respectively 0.053 (0.77, - 0.81) J/min and - 0.4 (0.70, - 1.50) J/min at low and high flows (r2 = 0.96 and 0.97, p < 0.01). The MP measured and computed by the two methods were highly correlated (r2 = 0.95 and 0.94, p < 0.01) with a bias of - 0.0074 (0.91, - 0.93) and - 1.0 (0.45, - 2.52) J/min at high-low flows. During pressure-controlled ventilation, the bias between the MP measured and the one calculated with the comprehensive and simplified methods was correlated (r2 = 0.81, 0.94, p < 0.01) with mean differences of - 0.001 (2.05, - 2.05) and - 0.81 (2.11, - 0.48) J/min.ConclusionsBoth for volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation, the surrogate formulas approximate the reference method well enough to warrant their use in the everyday clinical practice. Given that these formulas require nothing more than the variables already displayed by the intensive care ventilator, a more widespread use of mechanical power should be encouraged to promote lung protection against ventilator-induced lung injury.

Dataset Information

During Cycling What Limits Maximum Mechanical Power Output at Cadences above 120 rpm?

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

During Cycling What Limits Maximum Mechanical Power Output at Cadences above 120 rpm?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets