Dataset Information

Thai nurses' perceptions and practices of family-centered care: The implementation gap.

ABSTRACT: Objectives:This study was conducted to examine the differences between perceptions and practices of family-centered care among Thai pediatric nurses. Methods:This mixed-methods study consisted of two phases. In the first phase, a descriptive comparative design using the Family-Centered Care Questionnaire - Revised (FCCQ-R) was administered to 142 pediatric nurses from a university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. In the second phase, qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 pediatric nurses to gather complementary information regarding the major findings from the first phase. Results:The results revealed that family strengths and individuality were rated the highest as the most important elements and the most frequent practices. Parent/professional collaboration was perceived as the least important element, while the design of the heath care delivery system was rated as the least frequent practice. The qualitative data revealed that the major reasons for suboptimal implementation included a common perception that family-centered care is a Western concept, nurses' weak attitudes towards their roles, and a shortage of nurses. Conclusions:Nurses agreed that the identified elements of family-centered care were necessary but that they did not incorporate the concepts into their daily nursing practice to maintain their endorsement of the family-centered care model. Further study is needed to explore how family-centered care is understood and operationalized by Thai nurses and how hospital administration and environments can be modified to support this care model.

SUBMITTER: Prasopkittikun T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7031120 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Thai nurses' perceptions and practices of family-centered care: The implementation gap.

Prasopkittikun Tassanee T Srichantaranit Arunrat A Chunyasing Sirisopa S

International journal of nursing sciences 20191004 1

<h4>Objectives</h4>This study was conducted to examine the differences between perceptions and practices of family-centered care among Thai pediatric nurses.<h4>Methods</h4>This mixed-methods study consisted of two phases. In the first phase, a descriptive comparative design using the Family-Centered Care Questionnaire - Revised (FCCQ-R) was administered to 142 pediatric nurses from a university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. In the second phase, qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 ped ...[more]

PMID: 32099863

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceFamily-centered care recognizes families as central to child health and well-being and prioritizes clinician collaboration with families to ensure optimal pediatric care and outcomes. Clinician interpersonal sensitivity and communication skills are key to this approach.ObjectiveTo examine perceptions of and factors associated with family-centered care among clinicians working in pediatric and congenital heart care.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cross-sectional study, participants from diverse clinical disciplines (pediatric cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, nursing, anesthesia, neonatology, intensive care, psychology, and others), completed an online survey between June 2020 and February 2021. Participants included physicians, surgeons, nurses, and allied and mental health professionals at an Australian quaternary pediatric hospital network. Statistical analysis was performed from August 2022 to June 2023.Main outcomes and measuresFamily-centered care across 4 domains (showing interpersonal sensitivity, treating people respectfully, providing general information, and communicating specific information) was measured using the validated Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers. Clinician burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment), confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs, and psychological, clinical role, and sociodemographic factors were also assessed. Informed by theory, hierarchical linear regression was used to identify factors associated with family-centered care.ResultsThere were 212 clinicians (177 women [84.3%]; 153 nurses [72.2%], 32 physicians [15.1%], 22 allied and mental health professionals [10.4%], 5 surgeons [2.3%]; 170 [80.2%] aged 20-49 years) who participated (55% response rate). Of the 4 family-centered care domains, scores for treating people respectfully were highest and associated with greater clinician confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs (effect size [β], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.72]; P < .001), lower depersonalization (β, 0.04 [95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01]; P = .02), and a greater sense of personal accomplishment at work (β, 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.04]; P = 0.04). Greater interpersonal sensitivity was associated with greater confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs (β, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97]; P < .001), a greater sense of personal accomplishment at work (β, 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05]; P = .04), and lower use of approach-based coping, such as problem-solving (β, 0.37 [95% CI, -0.71 to -0.02]; P = .04).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study, burnout and confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs were associated with clinicians' perceptions of family-centered care. These findings suggest that targeted interventions to address these factors may benefit clinicians and also potentially strengthen the practice of family-centered care in pediatric and congenital heart settings.

Project description:BackgroundCare coordination is challenging but crucial for children with medical complexity (CMC). Technology-based solutions are increasingly prevalent but little is known about how to successfully deploy them in the care of CMC.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of GoalKeeper (GK), an internet-based system for eliciting and monitoring family-centered goals for CMC, and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.MethodsWe used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of GK as part of a clinical trial of GK in ambulatory clinics at a children's hospital (NCT03620071). The study was conducted in 3 phases: preimplementation, implementation (trial), and postimplementation. For the trial, we recruited providers at participating clinics and English-speaking parents of CMC<12 years of age with home internet access. All participants used GK during an initial clinic visit and for 3 months after. We conducted preimplementation focus groups and postimplementation semistructured exit interviews using the CFIR interview guide. Participant exit surveys assessed GK feasibility and acceptability on a 5-point Likert scale. For each interview, 3 independent coders used content analysis and serial coding reviews based on the CFIR qualitative analytic plan and assigned quantitative ratings to each CFIR construct (-2 strong barrier to +2 strong facilitator).ResultsPreimplementation focus groups included 2 parents (1 male participant and 1 female participant) and 3 providers (1 in complex care, 1 in clinical informatics, and 1 in neurology). From focus groups, we developed 3 implementation strategies: education (parents: 5-minute demo; providers: 30-minute tutorial and 5-minute video on use in a clinic visit; both: instructional manual), tech support (in-person, virtual), and automated email reminders for parents. For implementation (April 1, 2019, to December 21, 2020), we enrolled 11 providers (7 female participants, 5 in complex care) and 35 parents (mean age 38.3, SD 7.8 years; n=28, 80% female; n=17, 49% Caucasian; n=16, 46% Hispanic; and n=30, 86% at least some college). One parent-provider pair did not use GK in the clinic visit, and few used GK after the visit. In 18 parent and 9 provider exit interviews, the key facilitators were shared goal setting, GK's internet accessibility and email reminders (parents), and GK's ability to set long-term goals and use at the end of visits (providers). A key barrier was GK's lack of integration into the electronic health record or patient portal. Most parents (13/19) and providers (6/9) would recommend GK to their peers.ConclusionsFamily-centered technologies like GK are feasible and acceptable for the care of CMC, but sustained use depends on integration into electronic health records.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03620071; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03620071.

Project description:AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:To describe the perceptions that municipal primary healthcare nurses and municipal registered nurses had about a web-based learning intervention concerning supportive family health conversations in municipal home health care. BACKGROUND:Even though family health conversations are well grounded in theory with several reported benefits for patients and families, most working nurses have little or no training in practising family systems nursing including family health conversations. Continued learning is necessary for nurses, where web-based learning may be one answer of updating the professional skills and knowledge of nurses regarding supporting families. DESIGN:The study used a descriptive design and followed the "Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research" (COREQ) checklist. METHODS:Twenty-one nurses participated in an educational intervention that consisted of web-based learning and two face-to-face seminars about family systems nursing including family health conversations. The nurses were interviewed after completion, and the audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS:The findings consist of nurses' perceptions regarding the disposition of instruction, the prerequisites for learning and a changed approach when working with families. The findings are further reflected on through Illeris' theory concerning learning triangle. CONCLUSIONS:The findings are encouraging for educating nurses in family health conversations at their workplace, with the purpose of supporting patients and families. However, it is important to be aware of the different dimensions of learning, in addition to the appraisal of social aspects and organisational circumstances when educating nurses as they influence the utilisation of the knowledge. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE:This web-based learning intervention seems to be suitable for educating nurses in family health conversations and could be an appropriate step towards implementing these conversations in home health care with the purpose of supporting families.

Dataset Information

Thai nurses' perceptions and practices of family-centered care: The implementation gap.

Publications

Thai nurses' perceptions and practices of family-centered care: The implementation gap.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets