Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A randomized, 3-arm, neoadjuvant, phase 2 study comparing docetaxel?+?carboplatin?+?trastuzumab?+?pertuzumab (TCbHP), TCbHP followed by trastuzumab emtansine and pertuzumab (T-DM1+P), and T-DM1+P in HER2-positive primary breast cancer.


ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:The standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is dual HER2-targeted therapy. However, a need to minimize treatment-related toxicity and improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates, particularly in luminal HER2-positive disease, exists. METHODS:Neopeaks, a randomized, phase 2 study, compared docetaxel?+?carboplatin?+?trastuzumab?+?pertuzumab (TCbHP; 6 cycles; group A), TCbHP (4 cycles) followed by trastuzumab emtansine?+?pertuzumab (T-DM1+P; 4 cycles; group B), and T-DM1+P (4 cycles; group C) regimens in HER2-positive primary breast cancer patients; concurrent hormone therapy with T-DM1+P was administered in case of estrogen receptor positivity (ER+). Based on tumor shrinkage, nonresponders in group C were switched to 5-fluorouracil?+?epirubicin?+?cyclophosphamide (FEC; 4 cycles). Primary endpoint was pCR (comprehensive pCR ypN0 [ypT0-TisypN0]). RESULTS:Of 236 patients enrolled, 204 were randomized to groups A (n?=?51), B (n?=?52), and C (n?=?101). In group C, 80 (79%) patients continued T-DM1+P following favorable response, whereas 21 (21%) nonresponders switched to FEC. pCR rate was numerically higher with the TCbHP??? T-DM1+P regimen (71%) versus the standard TCbHP (57%) and T-DM1+P (57%) regimens. The rate in group C was higher among responders continuing T-DM1+P (63%) versus nonresponders who switched to FEC (38%). pCR rates after initial 4 cycles of T-DM1+P (group C; 57%) and standard TCbHP regimen (57%) were equivalent. pCR rate in patients with ER+ was significantly higher in group B (69%) than groups A (43%) and C (51%), but was comparable in patients with ER- (67-76%). Compared with the T-DM1-based arm, the incidence of adverse events was higher in the taxane-based arms. CONCLUSION:In the neoadjuvant setting, the pCR rate with the standard TCbHP??? T-DM1+P regimen was numerically better than the TCbHP regimen alone and significantly better in patients with ER+. Personalization of the T-DM1+P regimen could serve as a reasonable approach to minimize toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Trial registration ID: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000014649.

SUBMITTER: Masuda N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7031180 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A randomized, 3-arm, neoadjuvant, phase 2 study comparing docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP), TCbHP followed by trastuzumab emtansine and pertuzumab (T-DM1+P), and T-DM1+P in HER2-positive primary breast cancer.

Masuda Norikazu N   Ohtani Shoichiro S   Takano Toshimi T   Inoue Kenichi K   Suzuki Eiji E   Nakamura Rikiya R   Bando Hiroko H   Ito Yoshinori Y   Ishida Kazushige K   Yamanaka Takashi T   Kuroi Katsumasa K   Yasojima Hiroyuki H   Kasai Hiroi H   Takasuka Tsuyoshi T   Sakurai Takaki T   Kataoka Tatsuki R TR   Morita Satoshi S   Ohno Shinji S   Toi Masakazu M  

Breast cancer research and treatment 20200117 1


<h4>Purpose</h4>The standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is dual HER2-targeted therapy. However, a need to minimize treatment-related toxicity and improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates, particularly in luminal HER2-positive disease, exists.<h4>Methods</h4>Neopeaks, a randomized, phase 2 study, compared docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP; 6 cycles; group A), TCbHP (4 cycles) follo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5299741 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4791863 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8571284 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7494777 | biostudies-literature
2021-08-24 | GSE181574 | GEO
| S-EPMC5584549 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6172075 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7054312 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5465744 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8410619 | biostudies-literature