Dataset Information

ESTRO ACROP guidelines for positioning, immobilisation and position verification of head and neck patients for radiation therapists.

ABSTRACT: Background and purpose:Over the last decade, the management of locally advanced head and neck cancers (HNCs) has seen a substantial increase in the use of chemoradiation. These guidelines have been developed to assist Radiation TherapisTs (RTTs) in positioning, immobilisation and position verification for head and neck cancer patients. Materials and methods:A critical review of the literature was undertaken by the writing committee.Based on the literature review, a survey was developed to ascertain the current positioning, immobilisation and position verification methods for head and neck radiation therapy across Europe. The survey was translated into Italian, German, Greek, Portuguese, Russian, Croatian, French and Spanish.Guidelines were subsequently developed by the writing committee. Results:Results from the survey indicated that a wide variety of treatment practices and treatment verification protocols are in operation for head and neck cancer patients across Europe currently.The guidelines developed are based on the experience and expertise of the writing committee, remaining cognisant of the variations in imaging and immobilisation techniques used currently in Europe. Conclusions:These guidelines have been developed to provide RTTs with guidance on positioning, immobilisation and position verification of HNC patients. The guidelines will also provide RTTs with the means to critically reflect on their own daily clinical practice with this patient group.

SUBMITTER: Leech M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7033761 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

ESTRO ACROP guidelines for positioning, immobilisation and position verification of head and neck patients for radiation therapists.

Leech Michelle M Coffey Mary M Mast Mirjam M Moura Filipe F Osztavics Andreas A Pasini Danilo D Vaandering Aude A

Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology 20170105

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Over the last decade, the management of locally advanced head and neck cancers (HNCs) has seen a substantial increase in the use of chemoradiation. These guidelines have been developed to assist Radiation TherapisTs (RTTs) in positioning, immobilisation and position verification for head and neck cancer patients.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A critical review of the literature was undertaken by the writing committee.Based on the literature review, a survey was deve ...[more]

PMID: 32095536

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Because of the unprecedented disruption of health care services caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) identified an urgent need to issue practice recommendations for radiation oncologists treating head and neck cancer (HNC) in a time of limited resources and heightened risk for patients and staff. METHODS AND MATERIALS:A panel of international experts from ASTRO, ESTRO, and select Asia-Pacific countries completed a modified rapid Delphi process. Topics and questions were presented to the group, and subsequent questions were developed from iterative feedback. Each survey was open online for 24 hours, and successive rounds started within 24 hours of the previous round. The chosen cutoffs for strong agreement (?80%) and agreement (?66%) were extrapolated from the RAND methodology. Two pandemic scenarios, early (risk mitigation) and late (severely reduced radiation therapy resources), were evaluated. The panel developed treatment recommendations for 5 HNC cases. RESULTS:In total, 29 of 31 of those invited (94%) accepted, and after a replacement 30 of 30 completed all 3 surveys (100% response rate). There was agreement or strong agreement across a number of practice areas, including treatment prioritization, whether to delay initiation or interrupt radiation therapy for intercurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection, approaches to treatment (radiation dose-fractionation schedules and use of chemotherapy in each pandemic scenario), management of surgical cases in event of operating room closures, and recommended adjustments to outpatient clinic appointments and supportive care. CONCLUSIONS:This urgent practice recommendation was issued in the knowledge of the very difficult circumstances in which our patients find themselves at present, navigating strained health care systems functioning with limited resources and at heightened risk to their health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this consensus statement is to ensure high-quality HNC treatments continue, to save lives and for symptomatic benefit.

Project description:The head and neck is a challenging anatomic site for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), requiring thorough testing of planning and treatment delivery systems. Ideally, the phantoms used should be anatomically realistic, have radiologic properties identical to those of the tissues concerned, and allow for the use of a variety of devices to verify dose and dose distribution in any target or normaltissue structure. A phantom that approaches the foregoing characteristics has been designed and built; its specific purpose is verification for IMRT treatments in the head-andneck region. This semi-anatomic phantom, HANK, is constructed of Perspex (Imperial Chemical Industries, London, U.K.) and provides for the insertion of heterogeneities simulating air cavities in a range of fixed positions. Chamber inserts are manufactured to incorporate either a standard thimble ionization chamber (0.125 cm3: PTW, Freiburg, Germany) or a smaller PinPoint chamber (0.015 cm3: PTW), and measurements can be made with either chamber in a range of positions throughout the phantom. Coronal films can also be acquired within the phantom, and additional solid blocks of Perspex allow for transverse films to be acquired within the head region. Initial studies using simple conventional head-and-neck plans established the reproducibility of the phantom and the measurement devices to within the setup uncertainty of +/- 0.5 mm. Subsequent verification of 9 clinical head-and-neck IMRT plans demonstrated the efficacy of the phantom in making a range of patient-specific dose measurements in regions of dosimetric and clinical interest. Agreement between measured values and those predicted by the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) was found to be generally good, with a mean error on the calculated dose to each point of +0.2% (range: -4.3% to +2.2%; n = 9) for the primary planning target volume (PTV), -0.1% (range: -1.5% to +2.0%; n = 8) for the nodal PTV, and +0.0% (range: -1.8% to +4.3%, n = 9) for the spinal cord. The suitability of the phantom for measuring combined dose distributions using radiographic film was also evaluated. The phantom has proved to be a valuable tool in the development and implementation of clinical head-and-neck IMRT, allowing for accurate verification of absolute dose and dose distributions in regions of clinical and dosimetric interest.

Project description:PurposeBecause of the unprecedented disruption of health care services caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) identified an urgent need to issue practice recommendations for radiation oncologists treating head and neck cancer (HNC) in a time of limited resources and heightened risk for patients and staff.Methods and materialsA panel of international experts from ASTRO, ESTRO, and select Asia-Pacific countries completed a modified rapid Delphi process. Topics and questions were presented to the group, and subsequent questions were developed from iterative feedback. Each survey was open online for 24 hours, and successive rounds started within 24 hours of the previous round. The chosen cutoffs for strong agreement (≥80%) and agreement (≥66%) were extrapolated from the RAND methodology. Two pandemic scenarios, early (risk mitigation) and late (severely reduced radiation therapy resources), were evaluated. The panel developed treatment recommendations for 5 HNC cases.ResultsIn total, 29 of 31 of those invited (94%) accepted, and after a replacement 30 of 30 completed all 3 surveys (100% response rate). There was agreement or strong agreement across a number of practice areas, including treatment prioritization, whether to delay initiation or interrupt radiation therapy for intercurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection, approaches to treatment (radiation dose-fractionation schedules and use of chemotherapy in each pandemic scenario), management of surgical cases in event of operating room closures, and recommended adjustments to outpatient clinic appointments and supportive care.ConclusionsThis urgent practice recommendation was issued in the knowledge of the very difficult circumstances in which our patients find themselves at present, navigating strained health care systems functioning with limited resources and at heightened risk to their health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this consensus statement is to ensure high-quality HNC treatments continue, to save lives and for symptomatic benefit.

Project description:PurposeTo determine which head and neck adaptive radiotherapy (ART) correction objectives are feasible and to derive efficient ART patient selection guidelines.MethodsWe considered various head and neck ART objectives including independent consideration of dose-sparing of the brainstem/spinal cord, parotid glands, and pharyngeal constrictor, as well as prediction of patient weight loss. Two-hundred head and neck cancer patients were used for model development and an additional 50 for model validation. Patient chart data, pre-treatment images, treatment plans, on-unit patient measurements, and combinations thereof were assessed as potential predictors of each objective. A stepwise approach identified combinations of predictors maximizing the Youden index of random forest (RF) models. A heuristic translated RF results into simple patient selection guidelines which were further refined to balance predictive capability and practical resource costs. Generalizability of the RF models and simplified guidelines to new data was tested using the validation set.ResultsTop performing RF models used various categories of predictors, however, final simplified patient selection guidelines only required pre-treatment information for ART predictions, indicating the potential for significant ART process streamlining. The simplified guidelines for each objective predicted which patients would experience increases in dose to: brainstem/spinal cord with sensitivity = 1.0, specificity = 0.66; parotid glands with sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.70; and pharyngeal constrictor with sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.68. Weight loss could be predicted with sensitivity = 0.60 and specificity = 0.55. Furthermore, depending on the ART objective, 28%-58% of patients required replan assessment, less than for previous studies, indicating a step towards more effective patient selection.ConclusionsThe above ART objectives appear to be practically achievable, with patients selected for ART according to simple clinical patient selection guidelines. Explicit ART guidelines are rare in the literature, and our guidelines may aid in balancing the potential clinical gains of ART with high associated resource costs, formalizing ART trials, and ensuring the reproducibility of clinical successes.

Dataset Information

ESTRO ACROP guidelines for positioning, immobilisation and position verification of head and neck patients for radiation therapists.

Publications

ESTRO ACROP guidelines for positioning, immobilisation and position verification of head and neck patients for radiation therapists.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets