Dataset Information

The feasibility of using exoskeletal-assisted walking with epidural stimulation: a case report study.

ABSTRACT: Spinal cord epidural stimulation (SCES) exhibits a rehabilitation potential of restoring locomotion in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, this is linked to an intensive rehabilitation locomotion approach, which is impractical to apply among a large clinical SCI population. We, hereby, propose a rehabilitation approach of using SCES to enhance motor control during exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW). After 24 sessions (12 weeks) of EAW swing assistance decreased from 100% to 35% in a person with C7 complete SCI. This was accompanied by 573 unassisted steps (50% of the total number of steps). Electromyographic pattern improved during EAW, reflecting the subject's ability to rhythmically activate paralyzed muscles. Rate perceived exertion increased during EAW with SCES compared to stepping without SCES. These preliminary findings suggest that using SCES with EAW may be a feasible rehabilitation approach for persons with SCI.

SUBMITTER: Gorgey AS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7034511 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The feasibility of using exoskeletal-assisted walking with epidural stimulation: a case report study.

Gorgey Ashraf S AS Gill Satinder S Holman Matthew E ME Davis John C JC Atri Roozbeh R Bai Ou O Goetz Lance L Lester Denise L DL Trainer Robert R Lavis Timothy D TD

Annals of clinical and translational neurology 20200205 2

Spinal cord epidural stimulation (SCES) exhibits a rehabilitation potential of restoring locomotion in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, this is linked to an intensive rehabilitation locomotion approach, which is impractical to apply among a large clinical SCI population. We, hereby, propose a rehabilitation approach of using SCES to enhance motor control during exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW). After 24 sessions (12 weeks) of EAW swing assistance decreased from 100% to 35% i ...[more]

PMID: 32023011

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceRobotic exoskeletons leverage technology that assists people with spinal cord injury (SCI) to walk. The efficacy of home and community exoskeletal use has not been studied in a randomized clinical trial (RCT).ObjectiveTo examine whether use of a wheelchair plus an exoskeleton compared with use of only a wheelchair led to clinically meaningful net improvements in patient-reported outcomes for mental and physical health.Design, setting, and participantsThis RCT of veterans with SCI was conducted at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers in the US from September 6, 2016, to September 27, 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 10, 2022, to June 20, 2024.InterventionsParticipants were randomized (1:1) to standard of care (SOC) wheelchair use or SOC plus at-will use of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW) device for 4 months in the home and community.Main outcomes and measuresTwo primary outcomes were studied: 4.0-point or greater improvement in the mental component summary score on the Veterans RAND 36-Item Health Survey (MCS/VR-36) and 10% improvement in the total T score of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) physical and medical health domain and reported as the proportion who achieved clinically meaningful changes. The primary outcomes were measured at baseline, post randomization after advanced EAW training sessions, and at 2 months and 4 months (primary end point) in the intervention period. Device usage, reasons for not using, and adverse events were collected.ResultsA total of 161 veterans with SCI were randomized to the EAW (n = 78) or SOC (n = 83) group; 151 (94%) were male, the median age was 47 (IQR, 35-56) years, and median time since SCI was 7.3 (IQR, 0.5 to 46.5) years. The difference in proportion of successes between the EAW and SOC groups on the MCS/VR-36 (12 of 78 [15.4%] vs 14 of 83 [16.9%]; relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.45-1.85) and SCI-QOL physical and medical health domain (10 of 78 [12.8%] vs 11 of 83 [13.3%]; relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.44-2.15) was not statistically different. Device use was lower than expected (mean [SD] distance, 1.53 [0.02] miles per month), primarily due to the FDA-mandated companion being unavailable 43.9% of the time (177 of 403 instances). Two EAW-related foot fractures and 9 unrelated fractures (mostly during wheelchair transfers) were reported.Conclusions and relevanceIn this RCT of veterans with SCI, the lack of improved outcomes with EAW device use may have been related to the relatively low device usage. Solutions for companion requirements and user-friendly technological adaptations should be considered for improved personal use of these devices.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02658656.

Project description:Background: Clinical exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW) programs for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have been established, but many unknown variables remain. These include addressing staffing needs, determining the number of sessions needed to achieve a successful walking velocity milestone for ambulation, distinguishing potential achievement goals according to level of injury, and deciding the number of sessions participants need to perform in order to meet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for personal use prescription in the home and community. The primary aim of this study was to determine the number of sessions necessary to achieve adequate EAW skills and velocity milestones, and the percentage of participants able to achieve these skills by 12 sessions and to determine the skill progression over the course of 36 sessions. Methods: A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted across three sites, in persons with chronic (?6 months) non-ambulatory SCI. Eligible participants were randomized (within site) to either the EAW arm first (Group 1), three times per week for 36 sessions, striving to be completed in 12 weeks or the usual activity arm (UA) first (Group 2), followed by a crossover to the other arm for both groups. The 10-meter walk test seconds (s) (10MWT), 6-min walk test meters (m) (6MWT), and the Timed-Up-and-Go (s) (TUG) were performed at 12, 24, and 36 sessions. To test walking performance in the exoskeletal devices, nominal velocities and distance milestones were chosen prior to study initiation, and were used for the 10MWT (? 40s), 6MWT (?80m), and TUG (? 90s). All walking tests were performed with the exoskeletons. Results: A total of 50 participants completed 36 sessions of EAW training. At 12 sessions, 31 (62%), 35 (70%), and 36 (72%) participants achieved the 10MWT, 6MWT, and TUG milestones, respectively. By 36 sessions, 40 (80%), 41 (82%), and 42 (84%) achieved the 10MWT, 6MWT, and TUG criteria, respectively. Conclusions: It is feasible to train chronic non-ambulatory individuals with SCI in performance of EAW sufficiently to achieve reasonable mobility skill outcome milestones.

Dataset Information

The feasibility of using exoskeletal-assisted walking with epidural stimulation: a case report study.

Publications

The feasibility of using exoskeletal-assisted walking with epidural stimulation: a case report study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets