Dataset Information

Model-Informed Drug Development, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Cutoff Value Determination, and Antibacterial Efficacy of Benapenem against Enterobacteriaceae.

ABSTRACT: Benapenem is a novel carbapenem. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) cutoff values and evaluate the optimal administration regimens of benapenem for the treatment of bacterial infections via PK/PD modeling and simulation. Ertapenem was used as a control. Infected mice received an intravenous (i.v.) injection of benapenem or ertapenem of 14.6, 58.4, or 233.6?mg/kg of body weight, and the PK/PD profiles were evaluated. The MICs were determined by using a 2-fold agar dilution method. Mathematical models were developed to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of benapenem in humans and mice. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the cutoff values and the appropriate benapenem dosing regimens for the treatment of infections caused by clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae Two 2-compartment models were developed to describe the PK profiles of benapenem in humans and mice. A two-site binding model was applied to fit the protein binding in mouse plasma. Through correlation analysis, the percentage of the time that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (%fT _>MIC) was determined to be the indicator of efficacy. Results from the simulation showed that the probability of target attainment (PTA) against the tested isolates was over 90% with the dosing regimens studied. The PK/PD cutoff value of benapenem was 1?mg/liter at a %fT _>MIC of 60% when given at a dose of 1,000?mg/day by i.v. drip for 0.5 h. The established model provides a better understanding of the pharmacological properties of benapenem for the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae infections. The proposed PK/PD cutoff value suggests that benapenem is a promising antibacterial against the Enterobacteriaceae The cutoff value of 1?mg/liter may be a useful guide for the clinical use of benapenem and for surveillance for benapenem resistance.

SUBMITTER: Ji XW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7038265 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a commonly used antibiotic combination against the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new cefoperazone/sulbactam combination (3:1) for Enterobacteriaceae infection via model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches. Methods: Sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] was used as a control. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data was collected from a clinical phase I trial. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using two-fold broth microdilution method. The percent time that the free drug concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT>MIC) was used as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indicator correlated with efficacy. Models were developed to characterize the PK profile of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the investigational regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) against the tested bacteria. Results: Two 2-compartment models were developed to describe the PK profiles of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Simulation results following the single-dose showed that the regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam combinations in the ratios of 3:1 and 2:1 achieved similar PTA against the tested bacteria. Simulation results from the multiple-dose showed that the dosing regimen of cefoperazone/sulbactam (4 g, TID, 3 g:1 g) showed slightly better antibacterial effect than cefoperazone/sulbactam (6 g, BID, 4 g:2 g) against the Escherichia coli (ESBL−) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL−). For the other tested bacteria, the above regimens achieved a similar PTA. Conclusions: Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) showed similar bactericidal activity to sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] against the tested bacteria. For the ESBL-producing and cefoperazone-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae, Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) did not exhibit advantage as anticipated. Our study indicated that further clinical trials should be carried out cautiously to avoid the potential risks of not achieving the expected target.

Project description:BackgroundEvidence on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) alterations and clinical outcomes in obese patients with serious infections remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate predicted PK/PD indices of efficacy and observed clinical outcomes between obese and nonobese patients receiving cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam for Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of adult inpatients from 1/2012 to 9/2015 with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia who received empiric cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam. The primary outcome was clinical cure. First-dose free-drug exposure was estimated via predicted concentrations generated from population PK analyses and used to assess PD target attainment (>50% fT > minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]) for the specific Enterobacteriaceae isolate. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify independent predictors of clinical cure.ResultsOne hundred forty-two patients were included, 57 obese and 85 nonobese. Clinical cure was achieved in 68.4% of obese and 62.4% of nonobese patients (P = .458). No significant difference in outcomes was observed when evaluated by World Health Organization (WHO) obesity classes. The PK/PD target was achieved in 98.2% of obese and 91.8% of nonobese patients (P = .144). Independent predictors of clinical cure were immunosuppression and a shorter duration of bacteremia. Obesity was not identified as a significant predictor of clinical outcomes.ConclusionsNeither predicted PK/PD parameters nor clinical outcomes differed significantly between obese and nonobese patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime. As the majority of patients received extended-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam for bacteremia due to pathogens with low MICs, the potentially detrimental pathophysiologic derangements caused by obesity may not have been realized. Further studies are warranted to establish the optimal treatment of serious infections in obese patients.

Project description:Dolutegravir is a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) currently under review by the US Food and Drug Administration for marketing approval. The in vitro, protein-adjusted 90 % inhibitory concentration (IC90) of dolutegravir for wild-type virus is 0.064 ?g/ml, and it retains in vitro anti-HIV 1 activity across a broad range of viral phenotypes that are known to confer resistance to the currently marketed INSTIs, raltegravir and elvitegravir. Dolutegravir has a terminal elimination half-life of 13-14 h and maintains concentrations over the in vitro, protein-adjusted IC90 for more than 30 h following a single dose. Additionally, dolutegravir has low inter-subject variability compared with raltegravir and elvitegravir. A plasma exposure-response relationship has been well described, with antiviral activity strongly correlating with trough concentrations. Phase III trials have assessed the antiviral activity of dolutegravir compared with efavirenz and raltegravir in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients and found that dolutegravir achieved more rapid and sustained virologic suppression in both instances. Additionally, studies of dolutegravir activity in patients with known INSTI-resistant mutations have been favourable, indicating that dolutegravir retains activity in a variety of INSTI-resistant phenotypes. Much like currently marketed INSTIs, dolutegravir is very well tolerated. Because dolutegravir inhibits the renal transporter organic cation transporter 2, reduced tubular secretion of creatinine leads to non-progressive increases in serum creatinine. These serum creatinine increases have not been associated with a decreased glomerular filtration rate or progressive renal impairment. Dolutegravir's major and minor metabolic pathways are uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 and cytochrome P450 (CYP)-3A4, respectively, and it neither induces nor inhibits CYP isoenzymes. Thus dolutegravir has a modest drug interaction profile. However, antacids significantly decrease dolutegravir plasma exposure and should be separated by 2 h before, or 6 h after, a dolutegravir dose. In summary, dolutegravir is the first of the second-generation INSTIs and exhibits a predictable pharmacokinetic profile and a well-defined exposure-response relationship. Dolutegravir retains activity despite the presence of some class-resistant mutations and achieves rapid and sustained virologic suppression in ARV-naive and ARV-experienced patients. Clinically, dolutegravir is poised to become a commonly used component of antiretroviral regimens.

Dataset Information

Model-Informed Drug Development, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Cutoff Value Determination, and Antibacterial Efficacy of Benapenem against Enterobacteriaceae.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets