Dataset Information

Bactericidal activity of hexylresorcinol lozenges against oropharyngeal organisms associated with acute sore throat.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:For the majority of people with acute sore throat, over-the-counter treatments represent the primary option for symptomatic relief. This study evaluated the in vitro bactericidal activity of lozenges containing the antiseptic hexylresorcinol against five bacteria associated with acute sore throat: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae and Fusobacterium necrophorum. RESULTS:Hexylresorcinol 2.4 mg lozenges were dissolved into 5 mL of artificial saliva medium. Inoculum cultures were prepared in triplicate for each test organism to give an approximate population of 108 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL. Bactericidal activity was measured by log reduction in cfu. Greater than 3log10 reductions in cfu were observed at 1 min after dissolved hexylresorcinol lozenges were added to S. aureus (log10 reduction cfu/mL?±?standard deviation, 3.3?±?0.2), M. catarrhalis (4.7?±?0.4), H. influenzae (5.8?±?0.4) and F. necrophorum (4.5?±?0.2) and by 5 min for S. pyogenes (4.3?±?0.4). Hexylresorcinol lozenges achieved a?>?99.9% reduction in cfu against all tested organisms within 5 min, which is consistent with the duration for a lozenge to dissolve in the mouth. In conclusion, in vitro data indicate that hexylresorcinol lozenges offer rapid bactericidal activity against organisms implicated in acute sore throat.

SUBMITTER: Matthews D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7041292 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Bactericidal activity of hexylresorcinol lozenges against oropharyngeal organisms associated with acute sore throat.

Matthews Derek D Adegoke Oluwajoba O Shephard Adrian A

BMC research notes 20200224 1

<h4>Objective</h4>For the majority of people with acute sore throat, over-the-counter treatments represent the primary option for symptomatic relief. This study evaluated the in vitro bactericidal activity of lozenges containing the antiseptic hexylresorcinol against five bacteria associated with acute sore throat: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae and Fusobacterium necrophorum.<h4>Results</h4>Hexylresorcinol 2.4 mg lozenges were dissolv ...[more]

PMID: 32093784

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLozenges containing lidocaine and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) are commonly used for the treatment of sore throat. The lidocaine acts locally to provide pain relief and the CPC has an antiseptic effect. Mebucaine CL, a well-established fixed-combination sore throat lozenge, contains 1 mg lidocaine and 2 mg CPC. Single-agent lozenges containing 8 mg lidocaine have also been demonstrated to be significantly superior to placebo in confirmatory pain intensity assessments. This study compared a new lozenge formulation, containing 8 mg lidocaine and 2 mg CPC, with the currently marketed lozenge for the treatment and relief of sore throat symptoms in subjects diagnosed with a sore throat due to an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI).MethodsIn this double-blind parallel-group study, 250 adults with a sore throat due to an URTI were randomized to receive a single lozenge containing either 8 mg lidocaine + 2 mg CPC (n = 125) or 1 mg lidocaine + 2 mg CPC (n = 125). The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the change in sore throat pain intensity (STPI) between baseline (immediately pre-treatment) and the 2-h post-dose assessment, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. STPI was measured at baseline and regular intervals up to 240 min after the lozenge was administered (evaluated in clinic). Any difficulty in swallowing and time to onset and duration of the analgesic effect were also assessed.ResultsNo increase in efficacy was demonstrated with the higher dose of lidocaine. The difference in the 2-h post-dose change in STPI was not statistically significant between the treatments. There was only one statistically significant difference between the treatments in all of the efficacy outcomes assessed: pain relief scores at 4 h post-dose were higher with 1 mg lidocaine + 2 mg CPC than with 8 mg lidocaine + 2 mg CPC (P = 0.0461). The most commonly reported adverse event (AE) was a headache; the only other AE experienced by more than one subject was throat irritation. No severe adverse events were reported during the assessment period.ConclusionsThe modest difference in the pattern of effectiveness between the two treatments observed in this study does not support use of the 8 mg lidocaine + 2 mg CPC lozenge.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01265446 . Registered on 20 December 2010.

Project description:IntroductionSore throat is a common reason for overuse of antibiotics. The value of inflammatory or biomarkers in throat swab or saliva samples in predicting benefit from antibiotics is unknown.MethodsWe used the 'person-based approach' to develop an online tool to support self-swabbing and recruited adults and children with sore throats through participating general practices and social media. Participants took bacterial and viral swabs and a saliva sponge swab and passive drool sample. Bacterial swabs were cultured for streptococcus (Group A, B, C, F and G). The viral swab and saliva samples were tested using a routine respiratory panel PCR and Covid-19 PCR testing. We used remaining viral swab and saliva sample volume for biomarker analysis using a panel of 13 biomarkers.ResultsWe recruited 11 asymptomatic participants and 45 symptomatic participants. From 45 symptomatic participants, bacterial throat swab, viral throat swab, saliva sponge and saliva drool samples were returned by 41/45 (91.1%), 43/45 (95.6%), 43/45 (95.6%) and 43/45 (95.6%) participants respectively. Three saliva sponge and 6 saliva drool samples were of insufficient quantity. Two adult participants had positive bacterial swabs. Six participants had a virus detected from at least one sample (swab or saliva). All of the biomarkers assessed were detectable from all samples where there was sufficient volume for testing. For most biomarkers we found higher concentrations in the saliva samples. Due to low numbers, we were not able to compare biomarker concentrations in those who did and did not have a bacterial pathogen detected. We found no evidence of a difference between biomarker concentrations between the symptomatic and asymptomatic participants but the distributions were wide.ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that it is feasible for patients with sore throat to self-swab and provide saliva samples for pathogen and biomarker analysis. Typical bacterial and viral pathogens were detected but at low prevalence rates. Further work is needed to determine if measuring biomarkers using oropharyngeal samples can help to differentiate between viral and bacterial pathogens in patients classified as medium or high risk using clinical scores, in order to better guide antibiotic prescribing and reduce inappropriate prescriptions.

Project description:Enterococcus faecium has become a major opportunistic pathogen with the emergence of multidrug-resistant clones that are well-adapted to the hospital environment. As part of the vast diversity of gut microbiota, they are faced with different environmental stress, including antimicrobial pressure. By contrast, little is known about the effect of non-antibiotic molecules on bacterial physiology while numerous drugs are used in inpatients, especially those hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the most prescribed xenobiotics in ICUs on fitness, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance of E. faecium. Several phenotypic analysis was carried out and we rapidly brought to light that caspofungin, an antifungal agent belonging to the echinocandin family, seemed to have an important impact on E. faecium growth. Since the fungal target of caspofungin [beta-(1,3)-glucan synthase] is absent in enterococci, the mechanism of caspofungin action was investigated by several approaches. First, we decided to confirm this result by electronic microscopy and a peptidoglycan analysis by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Again, we highlighted that caspofungin even at subinhibitory concentrations (SICs) seemed to have an impact on cell wall organization especially in muropeptide precursors abundance. Then, a transcriptomic analysis was performed by RNA-seq (HiSeq 2500, Illumina) using the vanB-positive reference strain E. faecium Aus0004 in the presence or absence of caspofungin SIC (8 mg/L i.e., ¼ of the MIC). Transcriptomic analysis showed that the expression of 568 genes (19.9% of the genome) was significantly altered in the presence of caspofungin SIC, with 323 genes induced (fold change >2, p-value <0.1) and 245 genes repressed (fold change <-2, p-value <0.1). Regarding the repressed genes, the pdhABCD operon is largely downregulated (fold changes -4.3, -9.7, -6.9 and -6.4, respectively). This operon encoded components of the pyruvate deshydrogenase multienzyme complex involved in bacterial energetic pathway by the citrate cycle (i.e., TCA cycle). Moreover, it seemed that the glycerol metabolism pathway and in particular the glpOKF operon is downregulated too. The dramatic alteration of TCA seemed to have an drastic impact on bacterial cells viability indeed decrease of glycerol metabolism could explain the conformational modifications of peptidoglycan.

Project description:BackgroundAcute rheumatic fever (ARF) predominantly affects indigenous Māori schoolchildren in Bay of Plenty region, and more so male Māori students, especially when socioeconomically deprived. We evaluated the effectiveness of strategies for reducing ARF with group A streptococcal pharyngitis treatment in 2011-18.MethodsWe retrospectively assessed outcomes of 3 open cohorts of Māori schoolchildren receiving different interventions: Eastern Bay rural Cohort 1, mean deprivation decile 9.80, received school-based sore-throat programs with nurse and general practice (GP) support; Eastern Whakatane township/surrounds Cohort 2, mean deprivation 7.25, GP management; Western Bay Cohort 3, mean deprivation 5.98, received predominantly GP care, but 3 highest-risk schools received school-based programs. Cases were identified from ICD10 ARF-coded hospital discharges, notifications to Ministry of Health, and a secondary-prevention penicillin database. Primary outcomes were first-presentation ARF cohorts' incidence preintervention (2000-10) and postintervention (2011-18) with cases over annual school rolls' Māori students-year denominators.ResultsOverall, ARF in Maori schoolchildren declined in the cohorts with school-based programs. Cohort 1 saw a postintervention (2011-18) decline of 60%, 148 to 59/100,000/year, rate ratio (RR) = 0.40(CI 0.22-0.73) P = 0.002. Males' incidence declined 190 to 78 × 100,000/year RR = 0.41(CI 0.19-0.85) P = 0.013 and females too, narrowing gender disparities. Cohort 3 ARF incidence decreased 48%, 50 to 26/100,000/year RR = 0.52(CI 0.27-0.99) P = 0.044. In contrast, ARF doubled in Cohort 2 students with GP-only care without school-based programs increasing 30 to 69/100,000/year RR = 2.28(CI 0.99-5.27) P = 0.047, especially for males 39/100,000/year to 107/100,000/year RR = 2.71(CI 1.00-7.33) P = 0.0405.ConclusionsSchool-based programs with indigenous Māori health workers' sore-throat swabbing and GP/Nurse support reduced first-presentation ARF incidence in Māori students in highest-risk settings.

Dataset Information

Bactericidal activity of hexylresorcinol lozenges against oropharyngeal organisms associated with acute sore throat.

Publications

Bactericidal activity of hexylresorcinol lozenges against oropharyngeal organisms associated with acute sore throat.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets