Dataset Information

Comparison of Autologous vs Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Augmentation rhinoplasty requires adding cartilage to provide enhanced support to the structure of the nose. Autologous costal cartilage and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are well-accepted rhinoplasty options. Tutoplast is another alternative cartilage source. No studies, to our knowledge, have definitively demonstrated a higher rate of complications with IHCC grafts compared with autologous costal cartilage grafts.

Objective

To compare rates of outcomes in the published literature for patients undergoing septorhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage vs IHCC grafts vs Tutoplast grafts.

Data sources

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for articles published from database inception to February 2019 using the following keywords: septorhinoplasty, rhinoplasty, autologous costal cartilage graft, cadaveric cartilage graft, and rib graft.

Study selection

Abstracts and full texts were reviewed in duplicate, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Only patients who underwent an en bloc dorsal onlay graft were included for comparison to ensure a homogenous study sample. A total of 1308 results were found. After duplicate records were removed, 576 unique citations remained. Studies were published worldwide between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2017.

Data extraction and synthesis

Independent extraction by 2 authors was performed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main outcomes and measures

All reported outcomes after septorhinoplasty and rates of graft warping, resorption, infection, contour irregularity, and revision surgery among patients receiving autologous grafts vs IHCC vs Tutoplast cartilage grafts.

Results

Of 576 unique citations, 54 studies were included in our systematic review; 28 studies were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our search captured 1041 patients of whom 741 received autologous grafts and 293 received IHCC grafts (regardless of type). When autologous cartilage (n?=?748) vs IHCC (n?=?153) vs Tutoplast cartilage (n?=?140) grafts were compared, no difference in warping (5%; 95% CI, 3%-9%), resorption (2%; 95% CI, 0%-2%), contour irregularity (1%; 95% CI, 0%-3%), infection (2%; 95% CI, 0%-4%), or revision surgery (5%; 95% CI, 2%-9%) was found.

Conclusions and relevance

No difference was found in outcomes between autologous and homologous costal cartilage grafts, including rates of warping, resorption, infection, contour irregularity, or revisions, in patients undergoing dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. En bloc dorsal onlay grafts are commonly used in augmentation rhinoplasty to provide contour and structure to the nasal dorsum.

SUBMITTER: Vila PM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7042943 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of Autologous vs Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Vila Peter M PM Jeanpierre Latoya M LM Rizzi Christopher J CJ Yaeger Lauren H LH Chi John J JJ

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery 20200401 4

<h4>Importance</h4>Augmentation rhinoplasty requires adding cartilage to provide enhanced support to the structure of the nose. Autologous costal cartilage and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are well-accepted rhinoplasty options. Tutoplast is another alternative cartilage source. No studies, to our knowledge, have definitively demonstrated a higher rate of complications with IHCC grafts compared with autologous costal cartilage grafts.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare rates of outcomes ...[more]

PMID: 32077916

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePostoperative pain at the donor site is a common morbidity following autologous costal cartilage grafting.ObjectiveTo evaluate postoperative pain at the donor site after the use of a muscle-sparing costal cartilage harvesting technique compared with a muscle-cutting technique using electrocautery.Design, setting, and participantsDesigned as a controlled trial without randomization, this prospective, comparative cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017. Participants included 20 patients who underwent rhinoplasty for various cosmetic and functional complaints from January 1, 2016, to February 28, 2017. Of the 20 patients, 1 was excluded owing to an infection that developed on postoperative day (POD) 7. Patients were grouped by the rib harvesting technique used that was either a muscle-sparing technique (n = 11) or a muscle-cutting technique (n = 8). Skin incisions for both groups were carried out with a blade. Transection of muscle fascia and muscle fibers was performed with monopolar electrocautery in the muscle-cutting technique group. Blunt dissection with a hemostat was performed in the muscle-sparing technique group. All other surgical techniques were identical.Main outcomes and measuresPostoperative pain was assessed with visual analog scale scores for resting pain and movement pain. Eight pain measurements were noted at the sixth postoperative hour and on PODs 1, 2, 3, 7, 15, 30, and 45. During the hospital stay, the postoperative need for analgesics was recorded daily as the number of analgesic infusion vials used.ResultsThe 19 patients in the study included 11 women and 8 men whose mean age (SD) was 33.2 (10.3) years The mean (SD) visual pain analog scale scores for resting pain and movement pain were consistently higher in the muscle-cutting technique group than in the muscle-sparing technique group. This difference was statistically significant on PODs 2, 3, and 15 for resting pain and on PODs 2, 3, 7, 15, 30, and 45 for movement pain. The mean postoperative need for analgesic infusion vials during hospital stay was higher in the muscle-cutting technique group, and the difference was statistically significant on POD 2 (1.9 [0.6] vials vs 1.0 [0.9] vials; P = .02).Conclusions and relevanceBoth resting and movement pain at the donor site was significantly reduced in the muscle-sparing technique group during the postoperative period, findings that align with anecdotal reports in the literature. Routine use of the muscle-sparing technique in autologous costal cartilage harvesting is recommended to reduce postoperative pain.Level of evidence2.

Project description:ImportanceThe social perception of nasal dorsal modification for male rhinoplasty is poorly understood.ObjectiveTo investigate the association of modifying the male nasal dorsum with the perception of such social attributes as youth, approachability, healthiness, masculinity/femininity, intelligence, successfulness, and leadership.Design, setting, and participantsUsing computer simulation software, 12 images with varied combinations of the nasal dorsal shape, nasofrontal angle (NFA), and nasolabial angle (NLA) were generated from a photograph of a male volunteer's face in profile. These photographs were then sent to participants at a university clinic who were English-speaking adult internet users who were masked to the purpose of the study, which asked them to value different social attributes regarding the face in the photograph in a 16-question survey. The study was conducted in September 2018 and the data were analyzed thereafter until March 2019.ExposuresTwelve photographs embedded in a 16-question survey.Main outcomes and measuresPopulation proportions of responses and χ2 test and graphical analysis based on 95% confidence intervals.ResultsOf 503 respondents (survey provision rate, 100%), 412 (81.9%) were women, 386 (76.7%) were white, 32 (6.4%) were Hispanic or Latinx, 63 (12.5%) were black/African American, 10 (2.0%) were Asian/Pacific Islander, and the median age was 46 years (interquartile range, 32-61 years). The man with ski slope-shaped nose with an NFA of 130° and NLA of 97° was often associated with frequently perceived positive characteristics; specifically, he was judged to be the most attractive (95% CI, 18%-26%; P < .001). Participants also often associated superlative youth (95% CI, 15%-24%; P < .001), approachability (95% CI, 13%-20%; P = .002), and femininity (95% CI, 14%-22%; P < .001) with dorsal contours that did not feature a dorsal hump. The man with a dorsal hump-shaped nose with an NFA of 140° and NLA of 105° was associated by the highest proportion of participants with being the oldest (95% CI, 35%-44%; P < .001), least approachable (95% CI, 27%-35%; P < .001), least attractive (95% CI, 37%-42%; P < .001), and least healthy (95% CI, 26%-34%; P < .001). Subset analyses also revealed statistically significant dorsal contour preferences by observers' age, gender, and race/ethnicity.Conclusions and relevanceA reduced dorsal slope combined with more acute NFAs and NLAs was associated with positively perceived social attributes. The results may be of interest to rhinoplasty surgeons and their male patients when planning changes to the nasal dorsal contour.Level of evidenceNA.

Project description:ImportanceThere is no imaging standard to model nasal cartilage for the planning of rhinoplasty procedures. Preoperative visualization of cartilage may improve objective evaluation of nasal deformities, surgical planning, and surgical reconstruction.ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of visualizing nasal cartilage using high resolution micro-computed tomography (CT) compared with the criterion standard of pathologic findings in a cadaveric specimen and to evaluate its accuracy compared with various clinical CT protocols.Design, setting, and participantsAnatomic study at the University of Washington using single human cadaveric nasal specimens performed from July 10, 2017, to March 30, 2018.InterventionsA micro-CT acquisition with 60-micron resolution was obtained of a nasal specimen. The specimen was then scanned with 5 different clinical CT protocols to span both clinical care and machine limits. The specimen was then sectioned in 5-mm axial slices for pathologic analysis.Main outcomes and measuresMicro-CT images were registered to pathologic specimen cross-sections using a graphite fiducial system. Cartilage substructures were manually segmented and analyzed. A library of matched images across the micro-CT and various clinical CT protocols was then developed. Region of interest analysis was performed for each of the cartilage structures and their boundaries on clinical CT protocols and micro-CT, with the outcome of mean (SD) density using Hounsfield units.ResultsA single human cadaveric nasal specimen was used to obtain the following results. Lower lateral cartilage, upper lateral cartilage, and septal cartilage were accurately delineated on the micro-CT images compared with pathologic findings. The mean absolute deviation from pathologic findings was 0.30 mm for septal cartilage thickness, 0.98 mm for maximal upper lateral cartilage length, and 1.40 mm for maximal lower lateral cartilage length. On clinical CT protocols, only septal cartilage was well discriminated from boundary. Higher radiation dose resulted in more accurate density measurements of cartilage, but it did not ultimately improve ability to discriminate cartilage.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this anatomic study may represent a notable step toward advancing knowledge of the capabilities and pitfalls of nasal cartilage visualization on CT. Nasal cartilage visualization was feasible on the micro-CT compared with pathologic findings. Future research may further examine the barriers to accurately visualizing upper lateral cartilage and lower lateral cartilage, a prerequisite for clinical application.Level of evidenceNA.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Autologous vs Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance

Objective

Data sources

Study selection

Data extraction and synthesis

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Publications

Comparison of Autologous vs Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets