Dataset Information

Depressive Symptom Dimensions in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression and Their Modulation With Electroconvulsive Therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Symptom heterogeneity in major depressive disorder obscures diagnostic and treatment-responsive biomarker identification. Whether symptom constellations are differentially changed by electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains unknown. We investigate the clustering of depressive symptoms over the ECT index and whether ECT differentially influences symptom clusters.

Methods

The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) was collected from 111 patients with current depressive episode before and after ECT from 4 independent participating sites of the Global ECT-MRI Research Collaboration. Exploratory factor analysis of HDRS-17 items pre- and post-ECT treatment identified depressive symptom dimensions before and after ECT. A 2-way analysis of covariance was used to determine whether baseline symptom clusters were differentially changed by ECT between treatment remitters (defined as patients with posttreatment HDRS-17 total score ≤8) and nonremitters while controlling for pulse width, titration method, concurrent antidepressant treatment, use of benzodiazepine, and demographic variables.

Results

A 3-factor solution grouped pretreatment HDRS-17 items into core mood/anhedonia, somatic, and insomnia dimensions. A 2-factor solution best described the symptoms at posttreatment despite poorer separation of items. Among remitters, core mood/anhedonia symptoms were significantly more reduced than somatic and insomnia dimensions. No differences in symptom dimension trajectories were observed among nonremitting patients.

Conclusions

Electroconvulsive therapy targets the underlying source of depressive symptomatology and may confer differential degrees of improvement in certain core depressive symptoms. Our findings of differential trajectories of symptom clusters over the ECT index might help related predictive biomarker studies to refine their approaches by identifying predictors of change along each latent symptom dimension.

SUBMITTER: Wade BSC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7044066 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to compare the degree of symptom relief to psychosocial functional (abbreviated as "functional") improvement and explore the relationships between symptom relief and functional improvement during acute electroconvulsive therapy for patients with major depressive disorder.MethodsMajor depressive disorder inpatients (n=130) requiring electroconvulsive therapy were recruited. Electroconvulsive therapy was generally performed for a maximum of 12 treatments. Symptom severity, using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and psychosocial functioning (abbreviated as "functioning"), using the Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale, were assessed before electroconvulsive therapy, after every 3 electroconvulsive therapy treatments, and after the final electroconvulsive therapy. Both 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale scores were converted to T-score units to compare the degrees of changes between depressive symptoms and functioning after electroconvulsive therapy. Structural equation modeling was used to test the relationships between 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale during acute electroconvulsive therapy.ResultsOne hundred sixteen patients who completed at least the first 3 electroconvulsive therapy treatments entered the analysis. Reduction of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale T-scores was significantly greater than that of Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale T-scores at assessments 2, 3, 4, and 5. The model analyzed by structural equation modeling satisfied all indices of goodness-of-fit (chi-square = 32.882, P =.107, TLI = 0.92, CFI = 0.984, RMSEA = 0.057). The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale change did not predict subsequent Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale change.ConclusionsFunctioning improved less than depressive symptoms during acute electroconvulsive therapy. Symptom reduction did not predict subsequent functional improvement. Depressive symptoms and functional impairment are distinct domains and should be assessed independently to accurately reflect the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy.