Dataset Information

Quantitative analysis of medical students' and physicians' knowledge of degenerative cervical myelopathy.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

We have previously identified a delay in general practitioner (GP) referrals for patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an education gap existed for DCM along the GP training pathway by quantitatively assessing training in, and knowledge of, this condition.

Design

Gap analysis: comparison of DCM to other conditions. Comparators selected on the basis of similar presentation/epidemiology (multiple sclerosis), an important spinal emergency (cauda equina syndrome) and a common disease (diabetes mellitus).

Subjects

Medical students, foundation doctors and GP trainees. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Assessment of training: quantitative comparison of references to DCM in curricula (undergraduate/postgraduate) and commonly used textbooks (Oxford Handbook Series), to other conditions using modal ranks. (2) Assessment of knowledge: using standardised questions placed in an online question-bank (Passmedicine). Results were presented relative to the question-bank mean (+/-).

Results

DCM had the lowest modal rank of references to the condition in curricula analysis and second lowest modal rank in textbook analysis. In knowledge analysis questions were attempted 127 457 times. Performance for DCM questions in themes of presentation (+6.1%), workup (+0.1%) and management (+1.8%) were all greater than the question-bank mean and within one SD. For students and junior trainees, there was a serial decrease in performance from presentation and workup (-0.7% to +10.4% relative to question-bank mean) and management (-0.6% to -3.9% relative to question-bank mean).

Conclusions

Although infrequently cited in curricula and learning resources, knowledge relating to DCM was above average. However, knowledge relating to its management was relatively poor.

SUBMITTER: Waqar M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7044983 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is widely accepted as the most common cause of adult myelopathy worldwide. Despite this, there is no specific term or diagnostic criteria in the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision and no Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) or an equivalent in common literature databases. This makes searching the literature and thus conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses imprecise and inefficient. Efficient research synthesis is integral to delivering evidence-based medicine and improving research efficiency.ObjectiveThis study aimed to illustrate the difficulties encountered when attempting to carry out a comprehensive and accurate evidence search in the field of DCM by identifying the key sources of imprecision and quantifying their impact.MethodsTo identify the key sources of imprecision and quantify their impact, an illustrative search strategy was developed using a validated DCM hedge combined with contemporary strategies used by authors in previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This strategy was applied to Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) databases looking for relevant DCM systematic reviews and meta-analyses published within the last 5 years.ResultsThe MEDLINE via PubMed search strategy returned 24,166 results, refined to 534 papers after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 32.96% (176/534) results were about DCM, and 18.16% (97/534) of these were DCM systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Non-DCM results were organized into imprecision categories (spinal: 268/534, 50.2%; nonspinal: 84/534, 15.5%; and nonhuman: 8/534, 1.5%). The largest categories were spinal cord injury (75/534, 13.67%), spinal neoplasms (44/534, 8.24%), infectious diseases of the spine and central nervous system (18/534, 3.37%), and other spinal levels (ie, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral; 18/534, 3.37%). Counterintuitively, the use of human and adult PubMed filters was found to exclude a large number of relevant articles. Searching a second database (EMBASE) added an extra 12 DCM systematic reviews or meta-analyses.ConclusionsDCM search strategies face significant imprecision, principally because of overlapping and heterogenous search terms, and inaccurate article indexing. Notably, commonly employed MEDLINE filters, human and adult, reduced search sensitivity, whereas the related articles function and the use of a second database (EMBASE) improved it. Development of a MeSH labeling and a standardized DCM definition would allow comprehensive and specific indexing of DCM literature. This is required to support a more efficient research synthesis.

Project description:Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common aging condition caused by spinal cord compression. Individuals with DCM often presented with residual balance and functional impairments postoperatively. Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) has been shown to have positive effects on populations with neurological disorders but has yet to be investigated in DCM. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the effects of PBT on balance and functional performance in postoperative individuals with DCM. Fifteen postoperative individuals with DCM (DCM group) and 14 healthy adults (healthy control group) were recruited. The DCM group received a 4-weeks PBT using a perturbation treadmill. The outcome measures included mean velocity of center of pressure (COP) during quiet standing; center of mass (COM) variance and reaction time to balance perturbation during standing with forward and backward perturbation; gait speed during level ground walking; Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and disability questionnaire scores including Visual Analog Scale, Neck Disability Index, and Lower Extremity Function of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire. The assessments were conducted pre- and post-training postoperatively for the DCM group but only once for the healthy control group. Significant improvements were observed in the mean velocity of COP, COM variance, reaction time, gait speed, and TUG in the DCM group. Disability questionnaire scores were not significantly different after training in DCM group. For between-group comparisons, significant differences that were observed pre-training were not observed post-training. The 4-weeks PBT is a potential rehabilitation strategy for addressing balance and functional impairment in postoperative individuals with DCM. In addition, the post-training performance in the DCM group exhibited trends comparable to those of age-matched healthy controls. Furthermore, the training regimens offer a practical reference for future studies on populations with balance disorders. Future studies complemented with neurophysiological assessments could reveal more information of the underlying mechanisms of PBT.

Project description:Study designCohort study.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the associations of genetic and nongenetic factors with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).Summary of background dataThere is mounting evidence for an inherited predisposition for DCM, but uncertainty remains regarding specific genetic markers involved. Similarly, nongenetic factors are thought to play a role.Materials and methodsUsing diagnosis codes from hospital records linked to the UK Biobank cohort, patients with cervical spondylosis were identified followed by the identification of a subset with DCM. Nongenetic variables evaluated included age, sex, race, Townsend deprivation index, body mass index, occupational demands, osteoporosis, and smoking. Genome-wide association analyses were conducted using logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, population principal components, and follow-up.ResultsA total of 851 DCM cases out of 2787 cervical spondylosis patients were identified. Several nongenetic factors were independently associated with DCM including age [odds ratio (OR)=1.11, 95% CI=1.01-1.21, P =0.024], male sex (OR=1.63, 95% CI=1.37-1.93, P <0.001), and relative socioeconomic deprivation (OR=1.03, 95% CI=1.00-1.06, P =0.030). Asian race was associated with lower DCM risk (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85, P =0.014). We did not identify genome-wide significant (≤5×10 -8 ) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with DCM. The strongest genome-wide signals were at SNP rs67256809 in the intergenic region of the genes LINC02582 and FBXO15 on chromosome 18 ( P =1.12×10 -7 ) and rs577081672 in the GTPBP1 gene on chromosome 22 ( P =2.9×10 -7 ). No SNPs reported in prior DCM studies were significant after adjusting for replication attempts.ConclusionsIncreasing age, male sex, and relative socioeconomic deprivation were identified as independent risk factors for DCM, whereas Asian race was inversely associated. SNPs of potential interest were identified in GTPBP1 and an intergenic region on chromosome 18, but these associations did not reach genome-wide significance. Identification of genetic and nongenetic DCM susceptibility markers may guide understanding of DCM disease processes, inform risk, guide prevention and potentially inform surgical outcomes.Level of evidencePrognostic level III.