Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on a woman's quality of life. The transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our previous case-series study showed that the use of self-cut mesh had a good success rate (91.8% at 1-year follow-up) and low complication rate. This trial is designed to compare a self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh procedure with a mesh kit for the treatment of symptomatic stage III-IV anterior or apical prolapse in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness. METHODS:The trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. The primary outcome measure is the composite success rate at 1-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes are anatomic outcomes of each vaginal segment (anterior, posterior and apical) using the POP-Q score, subjective improvement of quality of life according to questionnaires, intraoperative parameters, complications and costs. Analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Based on a comparable success rate of 90% and 10% as the margin (? = 0.2 and one-sided ? = 0.025), about 312 patients in total from 11 centers will be recruited including 10% dropout. The aims of the research are to demonstrate whether the self-cut mesh procedure is non-inferior to the mesh-kit procedure and to investigate the performance of titanium-coated mesh for vaginal prolapse repair. DISCUSSION:This multicenter non-inferiority trial will evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of self-cut mesh is non-inferior to mesh kits in women with severe symptomatic stage III-IV anterior or apical prolapse. If we are able to show that the self-cut mesh procedure is non-inferior to the mesh-kit procedure in success rates, then the self-cut mesh procedure may be more cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03283124. Registered on 17 January 2018.

SUBMITTER: Chen J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7045611 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial.

Chen Juan J   Yu Jiajie J   Morse Abraham A   Fünfgeld Christian C   Huang Kuanhui K   Gong Jian J   Tao Guangshi G   Wang Binan B   Wang Yuling Y   Jiang Xiangyang X   Ababaikeli Gulina G   Liu Peishu P   Nisier Hatiguli H   Zhang Xiaowei X   Wang Ping P   Sun Xin X   Zhu Lan L  

Trials 20200226 1


<h4>Background</h4>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on a woman's quality of life. The transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our previous case-series study showed that the use of self-cut mesh had a good success rate (91.8% at 1-year follow-up) and low complication rate. This trial is designed to compare a self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh p  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4655022 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8009781 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5728256 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6489145 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10287778 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7679269 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9292877 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7658716 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3824218 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3808505 | biostudies-literature