Dataset Information

Longitudinal serum autoantibody repertoire profiling identifies surgery-associated biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Autoantibodies against tumor associated antigens are highly related to cancer progression. Autoantibodies could serve as indicators of tumor burden, and have the potential to monitor the response of treatment and tumor recurrence. However, how the autoantibody repertoire changes in response to cancer treatment are largely unknown.

Methods

Sera of five lung adenocarcinoma patients before and after surgery, were collected longitudinally. These sera were analyzed on a human proteome microarray of 20,240 recombinant proteins to acquire dynamic autoantibody repertoire in response to surgery, as well as to identify the antigens with decreased antibody response after tumor excision or surgery, named as surgery-associated antigens. The identified candidate antigens were then used to construct focused microarray and validated by longitudinal sera collected from a variety of time points of the same patient and a larger cohort of 45 sera from lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Findings

The autoantibody profiles are highly variable among patients. Meanwhile, the autoantibody profiles of the sera from the same patient were surprisingly stable for at least 3 months after surgery. Six surgery-associated antigens were identified and validated. All the five patients have at least one surgery-associated antigen, demonstrating this type of biomarkers is prevalent, while specific antigens are poorly shared among individuals. The prevalence of each antigen is 2%-14% according to the test with a larger cohort.

Interpretation

To our knowledge, this is the first study of dynamically profiling of autoantibody repertoires before/after surgery of cancer patients. The high prevalence of surgery-associated antigens implies the possible broad application for monitoring of tumor recurrence in population, while the low prevalence of specific antigens allows personalized medicine. After the accumulation and analysis of more longitudinal samples, the surgery-associated serum biomarkers, combined as a panel, may be applied to alarm the recurrence of tumor in a personalized manner.

Funding

Research supported by grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China Grant (No. 2016YFA0500600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31970130, 31600672, 31670831, and 31370813), Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (No. KLSB2017QN-01), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Medical Guidance Science &Technology Support Project (16411966100), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20172005), Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Outstanding Academic Leaders Training Program (2017BR055) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871882).

SUBMITTER: Li Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7047177 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy, yet many patients fail to respond. Thus, the identification of accurate predictive biomarkers of therapy response will improve the clinical benefit of anti-PD1 therapy. Method: We assessed the baseline serological autoantibody (AAb) profile against ~2300 proteins in 10 samples and ~4600 proteins in 35 samples with alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lymphoma using Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays (NAPPA). 23 selected potential AAb biomarkers were verified using simple, affordable and rapid enzyme linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA) technology with baseline plasma samples from 12 ASPS, 16 NSCLC and 46 lymphoma patients. SIX2 and EIF4E2 AAbs were further validated in independent cohorts of 17 NSCLC and 43 lymphoma patients, respectively, using ELISA. The IgG subtypes in response to therapy were also investigated. Results: Distinct AAb profiles between ASPS, NSCLC and lymphoma were observed. In ASPS, the production of P53 and PD1 AAbs were significantly increased in non-responders (p=0.037). In NSCLC, the SIX2 AAb was predictive of response with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87, 0.85 and 0.90 at 3 months, 4.5 months, 6 months evaluation time points, respectively. In the validation cohort, the SIX2 AAb was consistently up-regulated in non-responders (p=0.024). For lymphoma, the EIF4E2 AAb correlated with a favorable response with AUCs of 0.68, 0.70, and 0.70 at 3 months, 4.5 months, and 6 months, respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUCs were 0.74, 0.75 and 0.66 at 3 months, 4.5 months, and 6 months, respectively. The PD1 and PD-L1 IgG2 AAbs were highly produced in ~20% of lymphoma responders. Furthermore, bioinformatics analysis revealed antigen functions of these AAb biomarkers. Conclusion: This study provides the first evidence that AAb biomarkers selected using high-throughput protein microarrays can predict anti-PD1 therapeutic response and guide anti-PD1 therapy.