Dataset Information

Recommended changes for the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer-the findings of a single-institution evaluation.

ABSTRACT: Background:To evaluate the efficacy of the nodal descriptors and subgroups proposed by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) in the 8th edition of the TNM classification system and to provide references for future editions. Methods:A total of 3,177 patients with non-small cell lung cancer at the Beijing Cancer Hospital were classified based on the following three methods: (I) the N descriptors in the 8th edition of the TNM classification system: N0, N1, N2, and N3; (II) the IASLC-proposed N subgroups: N1a, N1b, N2a1, N2a2, and N2b; (III) our more extensive division method: N1a, N1b, N1c, N2a1, N2a2, N2b1, N2b2, N2c, N3a, and N3b. Five-year survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between subgroups were evaluated using the log-rank test. Results:(I) A significant survival difference was found between each adjacent N descriptor; (II) the difference between each adjacent subgroup N descriptor was significant, but the difference between N1b and N2a1 was not; (III) in our proposed method, a significant difference was found between all the subgroups apart from N2a2 and N2b1, N2b1 and N2b2, N2c and N3a, and N3a and N3b. Conclusions:The N descriptors in the 8th edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification system are consistent with our data. Although our more extensive division method could distinguish between patients at different stages, its implementation is complicated; thus, we recommend the implementation of the IASLC-proposed subgroups with the addition of the N1b and N2a1 groups.

SUBMITTER: Wang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7048979 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Recommended changes for the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer-the findings of a single-institution evaluation.

Wang Jia J Wu Nan N Lv Chao C Yan Shi S Yang Yue Y

Annals of translational medicine 20200201 4

<h4>Background</h4>To evaluate the efficacy of the nodal descriptors and subgroups proposed by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) in the 8th edition of the TNM classification system and to provide references for future editions.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 3,177 patients with non-small cell lung cancer at the Beijing Cancer Hospital were classified based on the following three methods: (I) the N descriptors in the 8th edition of the TNM classification system: N0, N1, N2 ...[more]

PMID: 32175416

Similar Datasets

Project description:The aim of our study was to explore the value of the 8th edition TNM staging system on evaluating the prognosis of colorectal carcinoid. Colorectal carcinoid patients between 1988 and 2015 were selected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database for analysis. About 4286 patients with colorectal carcinoid tumors were identified, of which were carcinoid tumor NOS (n = 1726), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (n = 1346) and other carcinoid tumor (OCT) (n = 591). Worsening 10-year CSS rates with increasing N status, M status, and SEER historic stage were demonstrated across all three above groups (all P < .05). In carcinoid tumor NOS, significant differences in CSS were found with increasing combined 8th AJCC stages (P < .001), except for that between stage II and stage III (10-year CSS rate: 82.6% vs 84.3%, P = .68). While combined 8th TNM stage in NEC and OTC exhibited greater separations in CSS despite on-going overlaps between groups. For carcinoid tumor NOS, stage II (HR = 3.37; 95% CI: 0.97-11.76), and stage III (HR = 2.09; 95% CI: 0.51-8.66) conferred no significant difference in CSS compared with stage I, while stage IV had an increasing HR of 5.09 (95% CI: 1.08-24.08). Although combined 8th AJCC stage had a good ability to distinguish 10-year CSS of patients with NEC or OCT, detailed 8th AJCC stage did not seem to be applicable. Detailed 8th AJCC categories of advanced stages in all the three groups conferred increased HRs with overlapping CIs. However, in the early and middle status, HRs did not increase with the increase of stages, or there was no difference in HRs between adjacent stages. Combined 8th TNM stage was not practical for judging the survival outcomes of colorectal carcinoid tumor NOS, especially in patients with stages II and III, but it provided useful prognostic information for NEC and OCT. However, for all carcinoid tumors, the prognostic values of detailed 8th AJCC stage were not enough accurate in the clinic. More optimized staging methods should be developed and validated in the future.

Project description:BackgroundThe UICC 8th TNM classification of lung cancer has been changed dramatically, especially in measuring methods of T-desriptors. Different from squamous- or small-cell carcinomas, in which the solid- and the invasive-diameter mostly agree with each other, the diameter of the radiological solid part and that of pathological invasive part in adenocarcinomas often does not match.AimWe aimed to determine radiological and pathological tumor diameters of pulmonary adenocarcinomas with clinicopathological factors and evaluate the validity of the 8th edition in comparison with the 7th edition.Methods and resultsWe retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological factors of 429 patients with surgically resected pulmonary adenocarcinomas. The maximum tumor and their solid-part diameters were measured using thin-sectioned computed tomography and compared with pathological tumor and invasive diameters. Overall survival (OS) rate was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method for different subgroups of clinicopathological factors. Akaike's information criteria (AIC) was used as a discriminative measure for the univariate Cox model for the 7th and 8th editions. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to explore independent prognostic factors. Correlation coefficients between radiological and pathological diameters in the 7th and 8th editions were 0.911 and 0.888, respectively, without a significant difference. The major reasons for the difference in the 8th edition were the presence of intratumoral fibrosis and papillary growth pattern. The weighted kappa coefficients in the 8th edition were superior those in the 7th edition for both the T and Stage classifications. In the univariate Cox model, AIC levels were the lowest in the 8th edition. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, lymphovascular invasion, pT(8th), and stage were the most important determinants for OS.ConclusionThe UICC 8th edition is a more discriminative classification than the 7th edition. For subsolid nodules, continuous efforts are necessary to increase the universality of the measurement of solid and invasive diameters.

Project description:Background: With the growing interest in treatment de-intensification trials for human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC), prognostic models have become essential for patient selection. The aim of this paper is to validate and compare the prognostic ability of the TNM 8th edition and previous published risk group classifications of Ang et al. and Rietbergen et al. and to derive a patient selection classification for de-intensification trials. Materials: Patients with HPV+ OPC treated with curative (chemo)radiotherapy between 2004 and 2017 were classified according to the TNM 8th edition, the model of Ang et al. and of Rietbergen et al. HPV status was determined by p16 immunohistochemistry staining. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using the log-rank test. Harrell's C-index was used as measure of discriminative performance. Results: A total of 333 OPC were identified of whom 100 were HPV+. The median follow-up was 63.7 months. The 5-year overall survival (5Y-OS) of stage I, II and III were 91.6, 55.2, and 38.0%. There was a significant difference between stage I vs. II and III. The Harrell's C-index for TNM 8th edition stage was 0.67. Including only HPV+ OPC, the Harrell's C-index for the model of Ang and Rietbergen were both 0.62. We combined the main prognostic factors defining the low risk groups in the three models, stage I, low comorbidity and ≤ 10 pack years, into one new low risk group to identify patients who may benefit from de-intensification trials. Intermediate risk was defined as stage I with high comorbidity or >10 pack years, high risk as stage II-III. The 5Y-OS were 100, 85.7, and 51.3%. The Harrell's C-index for the new classification model was 0.67. Conclusion: Although TNM 8th edition provides better OS stratification than the 7th edition, it is not performant enough for patient selection, neither are the models from Ang et al. and Rietbergen et al. Therefore, we propose a patient selection classification for de-intensification trials based on the new TNM classification 8th edition, comorbidity and smoking pack years. In addition, this study emphasizes the importance of patient selection and personalized treatment for HPV+OPC.

Dataset Information

Recommended changes for the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer-the findings of a single-institution evaluation.

Publications

Recommended changes for the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer-the findings of a single-institution evaluation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets