Dataset Information

Relationship between protein biomarkers of chemotherapy response and microsatellite status, tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression in cancer patients.

ABSTRACT: Chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies are increasingly used in combinations. We determined associations between the presence of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic biomarkers and protein markers of potential chemotherapy response. Data were extracted from a clinical-grade testing database (Caris Life Sciences; February 2015 through November 2017): immunotherapy response markers (microsatellite instability-high [MSI-H], tumor mutational burden-high [TMB-H], and PD-L1 protein expression) and protein chemotherapy response markers (excision repair complementation group 1 [ERCC1], topoisomerase 1 [TOPO1], topoisomerase 2 [TOP2A], thymidylate synthase [TS], tubulin beta 3 [TUBB3], ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 [RRM1] and O-6-methyl guanine DNA methyltransferase [MGMT]). Relationships were determined by the Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared test or Fischer's exact tests. Overall, 28,034 patients representing a total of 40 tumor types were assessed. MSI-H was found in 3.3% of patients (73% were also TMB-H), TMB-H, 8.4% (28.3% were also MSI-H) and PD-L1 expression in 11.0% of patients (5.1% were also MSI-H; 16.4% were also TMB-H). Based on concurrent biomarker expression, combinations of immunotherapy with platinum (ERCC1 negativity) or with doxorubicin, epirubicin or etoposide (TOP2A positivity) have a higher probability of response, whereas combinations with irinotecan or topotecan (TOPO1 positivity), with gemcitabine (RRM1 negativity), and fluorouracil, pemetrexed or capecitabine (TS negativity) may be of less benefit. The potential for immunotherapy and taxane (TUBB3 negativity) combinations is present for MSI-H but not TMB-H or PD-L1-expressing tumors; for temozolomide and dacarbazine (MGMT negative), PD-L1 is frequently coexpressed, but MSI-H and TMB-H are not associated. Protein markers of potential chemotherapy response along with next-generation sequencing for immunotherapy response markers can help support rational combinations as part of an individualized, precision oncology approach.

SUBMITTER: Nikanjam M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7051881 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe prognostic implications of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are poorly studied in hematologic malignancies.ObjectivesThis study aimed to better understand the characteristics and prognostic value of TMB and PD-1/PD-L1 in hematologic malignancies.DesignThis real-world study was conducted among patients with hematologic malignancies who had next-generation sequencing (NGS) (Foundation Medicine) at the University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center (2014-2018).MethodsTMB was measured by NGS. PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score, TPS) was measured by immunohistochemistry (classified as high (⩾50%), low (1-49%), and negative (<1%)). Data was curated from the electronic medical records.ResultsIn 388 evaluable patients, the most common diagnoses were B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (35%) and Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative disorders (16%). Median TMB was 1.6 mutations/Mb (range, 0-46.83). Forty-eight patients (12%) had TMB ⩾10 mutations/Mb, 90% of which were B-cell or T-cell NHL. In 85 samples with available PD-L1 scores, 11 were high; 26, low; and 48, no tumor cell expression. PD-L1 TPS positive (⩾1%) was most common in T-cell NHL (7/9 (77%) cases) followed by B-cell NHL (21/51 (41%) cases). TMB ⩾4 mutations/Mb and PD-L1 score ⩾1% were significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) from diagnosis, with hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46 (p = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.03) and HR = 2.11 (p = 0.04, 95% CI 1.04-4.30), respectively; the relationship was more pronounced when PD-L1 ⩾50% versus <50% was used (HR = 2.80, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.19-6.59). Higher TMB and higher PD-L1 positivity correlation were significant but weak (Pearson correlation coefficient R 2 = 0.04, p = 0.04).ConclusionTMB ⩾4 mutations/Mb and positive PD-L1 TPS are poor prognostic factors, correlating with shorter OS across hematologic malignancies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02478931.

Dataset Information

Relationship between protein biomarkers of chemotherapy response and microsatellite status, tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression in cancer patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets