Dataset Information

Handover among nurses working in selected newborn units in Kenya; its purpose and structure.

ABSTRACT: Introduction:Examining how nurses hand over provides an opportunity to identify opportunities for improvement. Although recognised as a complex and dynamic interaction among nurses, there is little consensus regarding the primary function, location and structure of handover. The aim of this study was to understand from nurses' perspectives, the purpose and structure of handover in three different health sector newborn units in Nairobi. Methods:This was an ethnographic qualitative research designed study. Between January 2017 and March 2018, I carried out 150 hours of non-participant observations, conducted 29 in-depth interviews with nurses (10) public sector (8) faith based and (11) private sector. All data was managed by Nvivo 10 (QSR International) and analysed using a thematic framework. Results:The purpose of handover was to pass on the management of a patient (s) from one outgoing nurse to incoming nurse at the end of a shift. In all three hospitals, handover took place at the nurse station, but for the nurses in both public and faith based hospitals, this was followed up by bed to bed handover. The structure differed from hospital to hospital, from nurse to nurse and what was actually handed over. The shift system, time available for handover, familiarity with babies, medical emergencies and use of notes were factors that influenced the structure of handover across hospitals. Conclusion:Although the purpose of handover was similar across the newborn units, the structure was different. There is need to perhaps develop communication guidelines for this key care process sothat all relevant information about the patients is maintained across nurses.

SUBMITTER: Nyikuri M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7052071 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Handover among nurses working in selected newborn units in Kenya; its purpose and structure.

Nyikuri Mary M

Heliyon 20200228 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>Examining how nurses hand over provides an opportunity to identify opportunities for improvement. Although recognised as a complex and dynamic interaction among nurses, there is little consensus regarding the primary function, location and structure of handover. The aim of this study was to understand from nurses' perspectives, the purpose and structure of handover in three different health sector newborn units in Nairobi.<h4>Methods</h4>This was an ethnographic qualitative ...[more]

PMID: 32140605

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe nursing process was initially adopted from the general system theory, and was developed and implemented in the field of education. There is a demand to implement the nursing process in practical care in every health institution, but the perception remains that it is time-consuming and impractical. If the nursing process is not valued and not used, nurses may continue to intervene on the basis of a medical diagnosis rather than on the basis of a rational nursing Process steps. In any of the steps, oversight or omission can result in less than optimal nursing care. The purpose of this study was to assess implementation and factors affecting the nursing process among nurses working in selected government hospitals in Southwest Ethiopia.MethodsAn institution-based cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from March 10 to April 1, 2015 in three hospitals in southwest Ethiopia using self-administered questionnaires. This study included a total of 138 nurses using simple random sampling. Data were classified, coded and entered into epidemiological information version 3.5.3, and exported to the statistical package for social science version 20 for analysis, descriptive statistics were used to describe the variables, bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to see the effect of each variable on the dependent variable.ResultThe nursing process was found to be 73.9% implemented. Compared to a Bachelor of Science nurses', the likelihood of implementing the nursing process was less likely among diploma nurses. Nurses working in administratively supported hospitals implemented the nursing process more compared to those without administrative support. The nursing process had been implemented higher by trained nurses compared to untrained nurses.ConclusionThe implementation of nursing process was good where; nearly seven in every ten nurses implemented the nursing process. Low educational qualification, lack of training, and non-supportive hospital administration were predictors of the nursing process implementation. The health service management, in collaboration with Ethiopian nursing/professional associations and international governmental and non-governmental organizations should give continuous on the job professional development education, and develop nursing practice guidelines.

Project description:ImportanceNurses working in an intensive care unit (ICU) are exposed to occupational stressors that can increase the risk of stress reactions, long-term absenteeism, and turnover.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of a program including simulation in reducing work-related stress and work-related outcomes among ICU nurses.Design, setting, and participantsMulticenter randomized clinical trial performed at 8 adult ICUs in France from February 8, 2016, through April 29, 2017. A total of 198 ICU nurses were included and followed up for 1 year until April 30, 2018.InterventionsThe ICU nurses who had at least 6 months of ICU experience were randomized to the intervention group (n = 101) or to the control group (n = 97). The nurses randomized to the intervention group received a 5-day course involving a nursing theory recap and situational role-play using simulated scenarios (based on technical dexterity, clinical approach, decision making, aptitude to teamwork, and task prioritization), which were followed by debriefing sessions on attitude and discussion of practices.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the prevalence of job strain assessed by combining a psychological demand score greater than 21 (score range, 9 [best] to 36 [worst]) with a decision latitude score less than 72 (score range, 24 [worst] to 96 [best]) using the Job Content Questionnaire and evaluated at 6 months. There were 7 secondary outcomes including absenteeism and turnover.ResultsAmong 198 ICU nurses who were randomized (95 aged ≤30 years [48%] and 115 women [58%]), 182 (92%) completed the trial for the primary outcome. The trial was stopped for efficacy at the scheduled interim analysis after enrollment of 198 participants. The prevalence of job strain at 6 months was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (13% vs 67%, respectively; between-group difference, 54% [95% CI, 40%-64%]; P < .001). Absenteeism during the 6-month follow-up period was 1% in the intervention group compared with 8% in the control group (between-group difference, 7% [95% CI, 1%-15%]; P = .03). Four nurses (4%) from the intervention group left the ICU during the 6-month follow-up period compared with 12 nurses (12%) from the control group (between-group difference, 8% [95% CI, 0%-17%]; P = .04).Conclusions and relevanceAmong ICU nurses, an intervention that included education, role-play, and debriefing resulted in a lower prevalence of job strain at 6 months compared with nurses who did not undergo this program. Further research is needed to understand which components of the program may have contributed to this result and to evaluate whether this program is cost-effective.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02672072.

Project description:Aims and objectivesThis study aimed to compare anxiety, resilience, and depression between COVID-19 unit (confirmed patients and suspected patients) and non-COVID-19 unit nurses and assess their effects on depression.BackgroundNurses working during the global pandemic are known to be physically and psychologically exhausted, and experience severe anxiety and depression. However, there is a lack of studies comparing anxiety and depression between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 unit nurses.DesignDescriptive research study.MethodsThis study was conducted on 64 nurses who directly worked for more than a month in a COVID-19 unit of a general hospital with nationally designated negative-pressure isolation beds and 64 nurses working in a non-COVID-19 unit. Data were collected through questionnaires and were analysed using SPSS 25.0. Reporting of this research adheres to the STROBE guidelines.ResultsAnxiety and depression were significantly higher in nurses working with patients suspected to have COVID-19 rather than nurses working with confirmed COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients. Resilience was significantly lower in suspected patient unit nurses than in COVID-19 unit nurses. Anxiety was the major factor predicting depression in both COVID-19 unit (confirmed patients and suspected patients) and non-COVID-19 unit nurses with 76.6%, 80.7%, and 63.6% explanatory power, respectively.ConclusionsAmong nurses working in COVID-19 units, suspected patients unit nurses had higher depression than confirmed patients unit nurses due to an unsafe facility environment, insufficient personal protective equipment, and unknown conditions of the patients. Thus, interventions which have a high impact on depression need to be provided to relieve anxiety.Relevance to clinical practiceThe nursing organisation must provide comprehensive support including coordinated shifts, internal motivation, incentives, up-to-date information, and clear infection prevention guidelines to relieve anxiety caused by exhaustive workload, uncertainty of infectious diseases, and lack of human and material resources.

Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate different professionals' (nurse anaesthetists', anaesthesiologists', and postanaesthesia care unit nurses') descriptions of and reflections on the postoperative handover.DesignA focus group interview study with a descriptive design using qualitative content analysis of transcripts.SettingOne anaesthetic clinic at two hospitals in Sweden.ParticipantsSix focus groups with 23 healthcare professionals involved in postoperative handovers. Each group was homogeneous regarding participant profession, resulting in two groups per profession: nurse anaesthetists (n=8), anaesthesiologists (n=7) and postanaesthesia care unit nurses (n=8).ResultsPatterns and five categories emerged: (1) having different temporal foci during handover, (2) insecurity when information is transferred from one team to another, (3) striving to ensure quality of the handover, (4) weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the bedside handover and (5) having different perspectives on the transfer of responsibility. The professionals' perceptions of the postoperative handover differed with regard to temporal foci and transfer of responsibility. All professional groups were insecure about having all information needed to ensure the quality of care. They strived to ensure quality of the handover by: focusing on matters that deviated from the normal course of events, aiding memory through structure and written information and cooperating within and between teams. They reported that the bedside handover enhances their control of the patient but also that it could threaten the patient's privacy and that frequent interruptions could be disturbing.ConclusionsThe present findings revealed variations in different professionals' views on the postoperative handover. Healthcare interventions are needed to minimise the gap between professionals' perceptions and practices and to achieve a shared understanding of postoperative handover. Furthermore, to ensure high-quality and safe care, stakeholders/decision makers need to pay attention to the environment and infrastructure in postanaesthesia care.

Dataset Information

Handover among nurses working in selected newborn units in Kenya; its purpose and structure.

Publications

Handover among nurses working in selected newborn units in Kenya; its purpose and structure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets