Dataset Information

Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection.

ABSTRACT: Purpose:To subjectively evaluate the in vivo tear film stability of three daily disposable contact lenses (DDCLs) using placido ring reflection at lens wear times of 5 mins and 8 and 12 hrs. Patients and Methods:This prospective, randomized, observer-masked, 3-way crossover study evaluated 28 subjects with good tear film stability. In vivo tear film stability was assessed for three DDCLs (nelfilcon A, etafilcon A, omafilcon A) on three different days over 12 hrs of lens wear. Time to first distortion by non-invasive keratography drying-up time (NIK-DUTf) was assessed by reviewing the captured videos. Lens wettability was also graded subjectively by three investigators using a scale from 0 (no visible distortions) to 3 (distortions in more than one-third of the ring reflection zone). Medians were analyzed statistically. Results:Mean NIKDUTf at 8 hrs was longer for nelfilcon A and shorter for etafilcon A and omafilcon A, but the differences were not significant. NIK-DUTf did not differ significantly among nelfilcon A, etafilcon A and omafilcon A DDCLs at all visits (p=0.36). Subjective wettability grades after 5 mins, 8 hrs, and 12 hrs differed significantly for etafilcon A (P <0.01) and omafilcon A (p < 0.01), but not for nelfilcon A (p = 0.05), DDCLs. Conclusion:Grading was sufficiently sensitive to differentiate the wettability performances of the three lens materials. Nelfilcon A maintained wettability over the wearing period, whereas etafilcon A material showed faster dewetting at 8 and 12 hrs than at 5 mins after lens insertion.

SUBMITTER: Muller C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7053817 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection.

Müller Christiane C Marx Sebastian S Wittekind Julia J Sickenberger Wolfgang W

Clinical optometry 20200228

<h4>Purpose</h4>To subjectively evaluate the in vivo tear film stability of three daily disposable contact lenses (DDCLs) using placido ring reflection at lens wear times of 5 mins and 8 and 12 hrs.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>This prospective, randomized, observer-masked, 3-way crossover study evaluated 28 subjects with good tear film stability. In vivo tear film stability was assessed for three DDCLs (nelfilcon A, etafilcon A, omafilcon A) on three different days over 12 hrs of lens wear. Time ...[more]

PMID: 32184693

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo compare the subjective performances of verofilcon A daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) and etafilcon A hydrogel CLs.MethodsSuccessful wearers of spherical soft CLs for distance correction were prospectively randomized to wear verofilcon A or etafilcon A lenses for 1 week and crossed over to the alternative lenses. The primary study objective was a comparison of distance visual acuity (VA). Exploratory endpoints included subjective overall lens preference (5-point scale) and subjective ratings (10-point scales) of end-of-day (EOD) vision, overall handling, insertion comfort, EOD comfort, overall quality of vision, overall comfort, vision throughout the day, lens handling at insertion, and lens handling at removal.ResultsOf 92 subjects (184 eyes), 46 each were randomized to verofilcon A or etafilcon A lenses and subsequently crossed over to the other lenses. Evaluation of distance VA showed that verofilcon A lenses were noninferior to etafilcon A lenses. Comparison of lens preference showed that 68 (73.9%) subjects somewhat or strongly preferred verofilcon A lenses, whereas 21 (22.9%) somewhat or strongly preferred etafilcon A lenses (p<0.0001). Mean ± SD ratings of EOD vision (8.6±1.5 vs 7.7±1.9), overall handling (8.7±1.5 vs 6.9±2.3), insertion comfort (9.2±1.0 vs 7.7±1.9), and EOD comfort (8.0±1.9 vs 7.0±2.2) were all significantly (p≤0.0001 each) higher for verofilcon A than for etafilcon A lenses. Mean ± SD ratings of overall quality of vision (8.9±1.2 vs 8.2±1.8), overall comfort (8.6±1.5 vs 7.4±1.8), vision throughout the day (8.9±1.3 vs 8.1±1.8), lens handling at insertion (9.0±1.4 vs 6.9±2.5), and lens handling at removal (8.3±2.1 vs 7.7±2.2) were also significantly higher for verofilcon A lenses. No subject experienced any ocular adverse events.ConclusionAfter 1 week of wear, the study population reported that ratings for subjective endpoints were significantly higher for verofilcon A lenses than for etafilcon A lenses.

Dataset Information

Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection.

Publications

Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets