Dataset Information

Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Outcomes data for patients who received tedizolid for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are scant. We provide a real-world analysis of economic and clinical outcomes following tedizolid use in the outpatient setting. METHODS:This retrospective study of adults with skin infections treated with tedizolid (index period: 1 July 2014-31 May 2016) used data from the Optum Research and Impact National Benchmark databases. RESULTS:Ninety-one patients received tedizolid for the treatment of skin infections (with complications, n = 18; without complications, n = 73). Some patients had > 1 complication and infection site. Among patients with complications, pre-index complications during the [index date - 30] through [index date + 1] period included osteomyelitis (44.4%), septicemia (44.4%), and prosthetic joint/device/graft infection (16.7%). For the [index date - 7] through [index date + 1] period, the infection site included abscesses (55.6%) and chronic ulcers (38.9%). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.8 (2.3) days. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) during the 30-day post-index period included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (100.0%), ≥ 1 emergency department (ED) visit (16.7%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (22.2%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $11,098 [lower quartile (Q1), $5688; upper quartile (Q3), $16,246; mean (SD), $14,637 ($11,435)]. Among patients without complications, the pre-index infection site from ([index date - 7] through [index date + 1]) included abscesses (60.3%), chronic ulcers (37.0%), and cellulitis (2.7%). Mean (SD) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.6 (2.5) days. Thirty-day post-index HCRU included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (91.8%), ≥ 1 ED visit (17.8%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (5.5%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $3230 (Q1, $2345; Q3, $6847; mean [SD], $6898 [$11,129]). CONCLUSIONS:Patients treated with tedizolid in the outpatient setting experienced a short duration of therapy, low hospital admission, and modest post-index HCRU indicators, suggesting its utility for outpatient therapy of ABSSSIs.

SUBMITTER: Kullar R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7054470 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAnti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 biologics revolutionized plaque psoriasis treatment by enabling ≥75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) in clinical trials. Modern biologics are now reported to achieve PASI 100 (complete skin clearance) in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence of skin clearance rates with biologics is limited. PSO-BIO-REAL was conducted to understand the real-world burden of plaque psoriasis.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this observational study was to estimate the proportion of patients who achieved complete skin clearance at 6 months. Secondary objectives included maintenance of response and evaluation of complete skin clearance at 12 months.MethodsPSO-BIO-REAL was a multinational, prospective, real-world, non-interventional study of skin clearance and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with biologics. A total of 846 patients from the United States (32%), France (28%), Italy (22%), the United Kingdom (11%) and Germany (8%) were enrolled and followed for one year. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had initiated a biologic for plaque psoriasis. Patients could be biologic-naïve or switching biologics (biologic-experienced). Assessments were made at baseline and at months 6 and 12.ResultsAt 6 and 12 months, 23% and 26% of patients achieved complete skin clearance, respectively. Prior to study entry, 60% were biologic-naïve. The proportion of patients achieving complete skin clearance was lower among biologic-experienced patients (20% at both months 6 and 12) compared with biologic-naïve patients (25% at month 6, 30% at month 12). The rate of complete skin clearance decreased as the number of prior biologics and baseline comorbidities increased.ConclusionOnly one in four patients achieved complete skin clearance after 6 months of treatment with biologics. The study indicates there still is an unmet need for more efficacious biologics for patients with psoriasis.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Patient-related (demographic/disease) and treatment-related (drug/clinician/hospital) characteristics were evaluated as potential predictors of healthcare resource use and opportunities for early switch (ES) from intravenous (IV)-to-oral methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-active antibiotic therapy and early hospital discharge (ED). METHODS: This retrospective observational medical chart study analyzed patients (across 12 European countries) with microbiologically confirmed MRSA complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI), ?3 days of IV anti-MRSA antibiotics during hospitalization (July 1, 2010-June 30, 2011), and discharged alive by July 31, 2011. Logistic/linear regression models evaluated characteristics potentially associated with actual resource use (length of IV therapy, length of hospital stay [LOS], IV-to-oral antibiotic switch), and ES and ED (using literature-based and expert-verified criteria) outcomes. RESULTS: 1542 patients (mean?±?SD age 60.8?±?16.5 years; 61.5% males) were assessed with 81.0% hospitalized for MRSA cSSTI as the primary reason. Several patient demographic, infection, complication, treatment, and hospital characteristics were predictive of length of IV therapy, LOS, IV-to-oral antibiotic switch, or ES and ED opportunities. Outcomes and ES and ED opportunities varied across countries. Length of IV therapy and LOS (r?=?0.66, p?<?0.0001) and eligibilities for ES and ED (r?=?0.44, p?<?0.0001) showed relatively strong correlations. IV-to-oral antibiotic switch patients had significantly shorter length of IV therapy (-5.19 days, p?<?0.001) and non-significantly shorter LOS (-1.86 days, p?>?0.05). Certain patient and treatment characteristics were associated with increased odds of ES (healthcare-associated/ hospital-acquired infection) and ED (patient living arrangements, healthcare-associated/ hospital-acquired infection, initiating MRSA-active treatment 1-2 days post cSSTI index date, existing ED protocol), while other factors decreased the odds of ES (no documented MRSA culture, ?4 days from admission to cSSTI index date, IV-to-oral switch, IV line infection) and ED (dementia, no documented MRSA culture, initiating MRSA-active treatment ?3 days post cSSTI index date, existing ES protocol). CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns and opportunity for further ES and ED were affected by several infection, treatment, hospital, and geographical characteristics, which should be considered in identifying ES and ED opportunities and designing interventions for MRSA cSSTI to reduce IV days and LOS while maintaining the quality of care.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) are a frequent cause of hospital admissions in the United States. Safe and effective outpatient treatments may lower ABSSSI-associated health care costs by reducing unnecessary hospital admissions. Using data from 2 phase 3 trials (ESTABLISH-1, NCT01170221; ESTABLISH-2, NCT01421511), this post-hoc analysis explored the efficacy and safety of tedizolid in an outpatient setting. METHODS:Subgroup analysis was performed on US outpatients (defined as patients who were not in hospital at the time of treatment initiation) with ABSSSI caused by presumed or proven gram-positive pathogens. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tedizolid phosphate 200?mg once daily for 6 days (n?=?403) or linezolid 600?mg twice daily for 10 days (n?=?410). The primary end point was early clinical response (48-72?hours after the start of treatment). Secondary end points included investigator-assessed clinical response at end of therapy (EOT) and post-therapy evaluation (PTE; 7-14 days after therapy). Additional assessments included the patient-reported level of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the per-pathogen favorable microbiological response rate at the PTE visit. Compliance with treatment and safety outcomes was also recorded. RESULTS:Early clinical response was similar between treatment groups (tedizolid, 82.4%; linezolid, 79.0%), as was investigator-assessed clinical response at EOT (tedizolid, 87.1%; linezolid, 86.1%) and PTE (tedizolid, 83.1%; linezolid, 83.7%). Mean changes from baseline to days 10 to 13 in VAS scores were identical between treatment groups (tedizolid, -51.9?mm; linezolid, -51.9?mm). Microbiological eradication rates were generally similar in both treatment groups for all key pathogens. Patients in both groups had favorable response at PTE. More tedizolid-treated patients (89.3%) than linezolid-treated patients (77.3%) were compliant with treatment. The most frequently reported drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (tedizolid, 10.7%; linezolid, 13.8%), diarrhea (tedizolid, 4.5%; linezolid, 5.9%), and headache (tedizolid, 5.5%; linezolid, 4.4%). Treatment discontinuation rates were low for both treatment groups (tedizolid, 0.7%; linezolid, 1.0%). CONCLUSION:Short-course therapy with tedizolid can successfully treat patients with ABSSSI caused by presumed or proven gram-positive pathogens in an outpatient setting.

Dataset Information

Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets