Dataset Information

Hair cortisol analyses in different mammal species: choosing the wrong assay may lead to erroneous results.

ABSTRACT: Wild animals are faced with a broad range of environmental stressors and research is needed to better understand their effect on populations. Hormone analysis based on enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) can provide valuable information on adrenocortical activity (stress), and assessment of cortisol in hair may allow the quantification of cortisol production. To validate hair hormone analysis, we compared two EIAs based on antibodies against cortisol-3-CMO-BSA and cortisol-21-HS-BSA for hair glucocorticoid (hGC) measurements in Egyptian mongoose, Iberian lynx, Alpine marmot, Asiatic black bear, spotted hyena and cheetah, with results obtained by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements. Both EIAs were also characterized by HPLC immunograms. Our results revealed that the cortisol-21-HS EIA measured 2.3- to 12-fold higher hGC concentrations than the cortisol-3-CMO assay. In dependence of the species, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) immunograms showed that up to 70% of immunoreactivities determined by the cortisol-21-HS constituted of unknown unpolar compounds leading to an overestimation of hGC. The cortisol-3-CMO EIA expressed a better specificity, with 32.1-67.4% of immunoreactivity represented by cortisol and cortisone. The LC-MS/MS analyses (gold standard) revealed that the cortisol-3-CMO EIA also resulted in an (up to 3-fold) overestimation of hGC, but EIA results were correlated with LC-MS/MS in the mongoose, the lynx, the spotted hyena and the marmot. No correlation was obtained for Asiatic black bears. As a result of our study, we strongly recommend to test any cortisol EIA for its specificity towards extracted hair components. In all analyzed species, except the Asiatic black bear, cortisone and cortisol were simultaneously present in hair extracts; consequently, an appropriate EIA should cross-react to these two glucocorticoid hormones and express negligible affinity towards substances with less polarity than corticosterone. Choosing the wrong EIA for hGC analyses may lead to overestimations of hGC or-in the worst case-to results that do not mirror real adrenocortical activity.

SUBMITTER: Jewgenow K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7055589 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Hair cortisol analyses in different mammal species: choosing the wrong assay may lead to erroneous results.

Jewgenow Katarina K Azevedo Alexandre A Albrecht Mareen M Kirschbaum Clemens C Dehnhard Martin M

Conservation physiology 20200304 1

Wild animals are faced with a broad range of environmental stressors and research is needed to better understand their effect on populations. Hormone analysis based on enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) can provide valuable information on adrenocortical activity (stress), and assessment of cortisol in hair may allow the quantification of cortisol production. To validate hair hormone analysis, we compared two EIAs based on antibodies against cortisol-3-CMO-BSA and cortisol-21-HS-BSA for hair glucocortico ...[more]

PMID: 32153782

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCurrently, there are no objective markers to measure treatment efficacy in chronic (distressing) tinnitus. This study explores whether stress-related biomarkers cortisol and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) measured in hair samples of chronic tinnitus patients change after compact multimodal tinnitus-specific cognitive behavioral therapy.MethodsIn this longitudinal study, hair-cortisol and hair-BDNF levels, self-reported tinnitus-related distress (Tinnitus Questionnaire; TQ), and perceived stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire; PSQ-20) were assessed before and 3 months after 5 days of treatment in N = 80 chronic tinnitus patients. Linear mixed-effects models with backward elimination were used to assess treatment-induced changes, and a cross-lagged panel model (structural equation model) was used for additional exploratory analysis of the temporal associations between TQ and hair-BDNF.ResultsAt follow-up, a reduction in TQ (p < 0.001) and PSQ-20 scores (p = 0.045) was observed, which was not influenced by baseline hair-cortisol or hair-BDNF levels. No changes in biomarker levels were observed after treatment. The exploratory analysis tentatively suggests that a directional effect of baseline TQ scores on hair-BDNF levels at follow-up (trend; p = 0.070) was more likely than the opposite directional effect of baseline hair-BDNF levels on TQ scores at follow-up (n.s.).DiscussionWhile the treatment effectively reduced tinnitus-related distress and perceived stress in chronic tinnitus patients, this effect was not mirrored in biological changes. However, the lack of changes in hair-cortisol and hair-BDNF levels might have been influenced by the treatment duration, follow-up interval, or confounding medical factors, and therefore must be interpreted with caution. The relationship between tinnitus-related distress and hair-BDNF levels should be explored further to obtain a better understanding of stress-related effects in chronic tinnitus.

Dataset Information

Hair cortisol analyses in different mammal species: choosing the wrong assay may lead to erroneous results.

Publications

Hair cortisol analyses in different mammal species: choosing the wrong assay may lead to erroneous results.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets