ABSTRACT: Importance:Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) has been reported to be safe and feasible. As a new technique, RPD has a learning curve similar to that of other types of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery such as laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. To our knowledge, no reports exist on the outcomes of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) and RPD after the learning curve. Objective:To analyze and evaluate the actual advantages of RPD. Design, Setting, and Participants:Between May 2010 and December 2018, 450 patients underwent RPD in the Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University in Shanghai, China, a high-volume pancreatic disease center. According to our previous study, an important flexion point in the learning curve is 250 cases. Data on the last 200 RPD cases were collected from January 2017 to December 2018. During that period, 634 patients underwent OPD. These patients were divided into 2 groups, and propensity score matching was used to minimize bias. The demographic data and operative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Analysis began May 2019. Exposures:Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and OPD. Main Outcomes and Measures:The short-term operative outcomes of RPD and OPD. Results:After 1:1 matching, 187 cases of RPD and OPD were recorded. In the RPD group, 78 patients (41.7%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 60.9?(11.4) years. In the OPD group, 80 patients (42.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 60.1?(10.8) years. Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy had advantages in operative time (mean [SD], 279.7?[76.3] minutes vs 298.2?[78.3] minutes; P?=?.02), estimated blood loss (mean [SD], 297.3?[246.8] mL vs 415.2?[497.9] mL; P?=?.002), and postoperative length of hospital stay (mean [SD], 22.4?[16.7] days vs 26.1?[16.3] days; P?=?.03). However, there was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate and incidence rate of postoperative complications, such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leak, and delayed gastric emptying. The incidence rates of postoperative bleeding and reoperation in the RPD group were similar to those in the OPD group, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusions and Relevance:After passing the learning curve, RPD had advantages in operative time and blood loss compared with OPD. There were no differences in postoperative complications such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leak, and delayed gastric emptying. However, patients recovered more quickly after RPD than after OPD. A prospective randomized clinical trial is needed in the future to verify these results.
