Dataset Information

CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) is an effective and stable solution for heart sparing radiotherapy of left sided breast cancer.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Limiting the heart dose in left sided breast cancer radiotherapy is critical. We sought to study the effect of using CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) as an aid in reducing heart dose in breast cancer radiotherapy. METHODS:Patients with left sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were enrolled on a prospective IRB (institutional review board) approved clinical trial utilizing CPAP during radiotherapy. Each patient was simulated and planned with and without CPAP and the best dosimetric results determined the patient's treatment. Data on the differences in lung and heart volume and position as well as boost cavity position with and without CPAP were analyzed. RESULTS:Twenty-four women from 10/16 to 10/18 were enrolled. Seven patients were not treated on study; only two of these were due to treatment issues. Median age was 54?years. 70% had breast only radiation and 30% were treated to breast\CW (chest wall) and regional nodes. The median lung volume with CPAP was 60% larger than without CPAP. (1637 vs. 996?cc) p?

SUBMITTER: Allen AM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7060550 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) is an effective and stable solution for heart sparing radiotherapy of left sided breast cancer.

Allen Aaron M AM Ceder Yasmin Korzets YK Shochat Tzippy T Fenig Eyal E Popovtzer Aron A Bragilofsky Dimitry D Alfassy Adi A Allon Helena H

Radiation oncology (London, England) 20200306 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>Limiting the heart dose in left sided breast cancer radiotherapy is critical. We sought to study the effect of using CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) as an aid in reducing heart dose in breast cancer radiotherapy.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with left sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were enrolled on a prospective IRB (institutional review board) approved clinical trial utilizing CPAP during radiotherapy. Each patient was simulated and planned with and wi ...[more]

PMID: 32143658

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe cardiotoxicity caused by radiotherapy is a critical problem in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. The appropriate radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in left-sided breast cancer has not been well defined. The aim of this study was thus to compare the dosimetric differences in heart and cardiac valves of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to find the optimal radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in patients with left breast cancer.MethodsFrom January 5, 2021, to March 15, 2021, 21 patients with left-sided breast cancer postmastectomy were included in this study, and 3 different plans for adjuvant radiation were created using 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT for each patient. All patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The mean dose (Dmean) of the heart; percentage volume of the heart receiving ≥5 Gy (V5), ≥30 Gy (V30), and ≥40 Gy (V40); and the Dmean and the near-maximum dose (D0.03cc) of cardiac valves were extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and compared. The correlations in dosimetric factors between cardiac valves and the whole heart were analyzed.ResultsIMRT significantly decreased the values of V5, V30, V40, and Dmean in the whole heart compared to 3D-CRT and VMAT (P<0.001). Among the 3 different plans, IMRT had the lowest radiation dose to the Dmean and the D0.03cc of the aortic valve (1.27 Gy/1.75 Gy), pulmonary valve (3.44 Gy/6.89 Gy), tricuspid valve (1.02 Gy/1.14 Gy), and mitral valve (0.93 Gy/1.00 Gy). Pearson correlation analysis found that local parameters (Dmean and D0.03cc) within valves were strongly correlated to the global parameters (V5, V30, V40, and Dmean) of the heart.ConclusionsThis study revealed that IMRT showed the lowest cardiac valves dose compared with 3D-CRT and VMAT in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. IMRT might be the optimal modality sparing for cardiac valves in this group of patients. Further studies need to be carried out in order to validate the protective role of IMRT on the cardiac valves.

Project description:IntroductionDeep-inspirational breath hold (DIBH) is an option for heart protection in breast radiotherapy; we intended to study its individual benefit.Materials and methods3DCRT treatment planning was performed in a cohort of 103 patients receiving radiotherapy of the whole breast (WBI)/chest wall (CWI) ± nodal regions (NI) both under DIBH and free breathing (FB) in the supine position, and in the WBI only cases prone (n = 45) position, too. A series of patient-related and heart dosimetry parameters were analyzed.ResultsThe DIBH technique provided dramatic reduction of all heart dosimetry parameters the individual benefit, however, varied. In the whole population the best predictor of benefit was the ratio of ipsilateral lung volume (ILV)FB and ILVDIBH. In the WBI cohort 9-11 patients and 5-8 patients received less dose to selected heart structures with the DIBH and prone positioning, respectively; based on meeting various dose constraints DIBH was the only solution in 6-13 cases, and prone positioning in 5-6 cases. In addition to other excellent predictors, a small ILVFB or ILVDIBH with outstanding predicting performance (AUC ≥ 0.90) suggested prone positioning. Detailed analysis consistently indicated the outstanding performance of ILVFB and ILVDIBH in predicting the benefit of one over the other technique in lowering the mean heart dose (MHD), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) mean dose and left ventricle(LV)-V5Gy. The preference of prone positioning was further confirmed by anatomical parameters measured on a single CT scan at the middle of the heart. Performing spirometry in a cohort of 12 patients, vital capacity showed the strongest correlation with ILVFB and ILVDIBH hence this test could be evaluated as a clinical tool for patient selection.DiscussionIndividual lung volume measures estimated by spirometry and anatomical data examined prior to acquiring planning CT may support the preference of DIBH or prone radiotherapy for optimal heart protection.

Project description:BackgroundThis study investigated the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of utilizing a new proton treatment technique: Spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) to further reduce radiation dose to healthy tissue and mitigate the probability of normal tissue complications compared to conventional intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT).MethodsEight patients diagnosed with left-sided breast cancer and treated with breast-preserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation without regional nodal irradiation were included in this retrospective planning. Two proton treatment plans were generated for each patient: vertical intensity-modulated proton therapy used for clinical treatment (vIMPT, gantry angle 10°-30°) and SPArc for comparison purpose. Both SPArc and vIMPT plans were optimized using the robust optimization of?±?3.5% range and 5 mm setup uncertainties. Root-mean-square deviation dose (RMSD) volume histograms were used for plan robustness evaluation. All dosimetric results were evaluated based on dose-volume histograms (DVH), and the interplay effect was evaluated based on the accumulation of single-fraction 4D dynamic dose on CT50. The treatment beam delivery time was simulated based on a gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 5 s.ResultsThe average D1 to the heart and LAD were reduced to 53.63 cGy and 82.25 cGy compared with vIMPT 110.38 cGy (p?=?0.001) and 170.38 cGy (p?=?0.001), respectively. The average V5Gy and V20Gy of ipsilateral lung was reduced to 16.77% and 3.07% compared to vIMPT 25.56% (p?=?0.001) and 4.68% (p?=?0.003). Skin3mm mean and maximum dose were reduced to 3999.38 cGy and 4395.63 cGy compared to vIMPT 4104.25 cGy (p?=?0.039) and 4411.63 cGy (p?=?0.043), respectively. A significant relative risk reduction (RNTCP?=?NTCPSPArc/NTCPvIMPT) for organs at risk (OARs) was obtained with SPArc ranging from 0.61 to 0.86 depending on the clinical endpoint. The RMSD volume histogram (RVH) analysis shows SPArc provided better plan robustness in OARs sparing, including the heart, LAD, ipsilateral lung, and skin. The average estimated treatment beam delivery times were comparable to vIMPT plans when the ELST is about 0.5 s.ConclusionSPArc technique can further reduce dose delivered to OARs and the probability of normal tissue complications in patients treated for left-sided WBRT.

Dataset Information

CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) is an effective and stable solution for heart sparing radiotherapy of left sided breast cancer.

Publications

CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) is an effective and stable solution for heart sparing radiotherapy of left sided breast cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets