Dataset Information

Assessing gait efficacy in older adults: An analysis using item response theory.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Assessing confidence in walking in older adults is important, as mobility is a critical aspect of independence and function, and self-report provides complementary information to performance-based measures. The modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) is a self-report measure used to examine confidence in walking. RESEARCH QUESTION:What are the psychometric properties of the mGES at the item level? Are there opportunities for improvement? METHODS:We performed a secondary analysis of baseline data from a cluster randomized trial of 424 community-dwelling older adults and reliability data from 123 participants. We fitted a graded response model to dissect the mGES to the item and individual response level and examined opportunities to improve and possible shorten the mGES. We examined psychometric characteristics such as internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity with respect to other relevant measures. RESULTS:Mobility tasks such as navigating stairs and curbs with separate items for going up and down largely provide the same information on confidence, with downward direction providing slightly more. It may be reasonable to consider removal of walking 1/2 mile, stepping down and/or stair tasks with railings items due to little or duplicate information contributed compared to other items. The shortened scales proposed by removing the above items had similar psychometric properties to mGES. SIGNIFICANCE:The mGES has good psychometric properties, but can be potentially shortened to substantially reduce responder burden. The upward direction curb and stairs items can be removed to result in a 7-item scale with virtually no loss of desirable psychometrics. An alternative 3-item version, level surface walking, stepping down curb and climbing up stairs without a railing items, entails only a minimal loss in psychometric properties.

SUBMITTER: Perera S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7061088 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessing gait efficacy in older adults: An analysis using item response theory.

Perera Subashan S VanSwearingen Jessie J Shuman Valerie V Brach Jennifer S JS

Gait & posture 20200128

<h4>Background</h4>Assessing confidence in walking in older adults is important, as mobility is a critical aspect of independence and function, and self-report provides complementary information to performance-based measures. The modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) is a self-report measure used to examine confidence in walking.<h4>Research question</h4>What are the psychometric properties of the mGES at the item level? Are there opportunities for improvement?<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a second ...[more]

PMID: 32028078

Similar Datasets

Project description:Although many interventions and services for autistic people have the ultimate goal of improving quality of life (QoL), there is relatively little research on how best to assess this construct in the autistic population, and existing scales designed for non-autistic individuals may not assess all meaningful facets of QoL in the autistic population. To address this need, the autism spectrum QoL form (ASQoL) was recently developed as a measure of the autism-relevant quality of life. However, the psychometrics of the ASQoL have not been examined beyond the authors' initial validation study, and important properties such as measurement invariance/differential item functioning (DIF) have not yet been tested. Using data from 700 autistic adults recruited from the Simons Foundation's SPARK cohort, the current study sought to perform a comprehensive independent psychometric evaluation of the ASQoL using item response theory, comparing its performance to a newly-proposed brief measure of general QoL (the WHOQOL-4). Our models revealed substantial DIF by sex and gender in the ASQoL, which caused ASQoL scores to grossly underestimate the self-reported QoL of autistic women. Based on a comparison of latent variable means, we demonstrated that observed sex/gender differences in manifest ASQoL scores were the result of statistical artifacts, a claim that was further supported by the lack of significant group differences on the sex/gender-invariant WHOQOL-4. Our findings indicate that the ASQoL composite score is psychometrically problematic in its current form, and substantial revisions may be necessary before valid and meaningful inferences can be made regarding autism-relevant aspects of QoL. LAY SUMMARY: Quality of life (QoL) is an extremely important outcome for autistic people, but many of the tools that are used to measure it does not take into account how QoL may be different for autistic people. Using data from 700 autistic adults, we examined the measurement properties of the autism spectrum quality of life form (ASQoL), a new measure of QoL designed specifically for autistic people. Our results indicate that the ASQoL shows a pronounced sex/gender bias, which causes it to underestimate QoL in autistic women. This bias needs to be eliminated before the ASQoL can be successfully used to measure QoL in the autistic population.

Project description:Allostatic load is commonly operationalized using a sum-score of high-risk biomarkers. However, this method implies that biomarkers contribute equally to allostatic load, as each is given equal weight. Our goal in this methodological paper is to evaluate this, and complementarily, to identify biomarkers that are most informative and least informative for developing an allostatic load index. Item response theory models provide an alternate approach to calculating the allostatic load score, by treating individual biomarkers (e.g. “items”) as indicators of a latent allostatic load construct. Item response theory scores account for the data-driven discriminating power of each biomarker, and an individual’s pattern of biomarker responses. To demonstrate feasibility of this approach, we used data from the 2015–2016 National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey (NHANES; N = 3751), with twelve allostatic load biomarkers representing immune response, metabolic function and cardiovascular health. Item response theory models revealed that body-mass-index and C-reactive protein were the most informative biomarkers for allostatic load. Both higher allostatic load sum-score and allostatic load item response theory score were associated with lower socio-economic status (p = 0.008; p<0.001, respectively). Further, both formulations of allostatic load were positively associated with a nine-item depression screener (p<0.001 for both), but only the item response theory score was also positively associated with the impact of depressive symptoms on daily life (p = 0.045). Item response theory scores may be more finely tuned to tease out effects, compared to sum-scores, and also provide more flexibility when there are missing biomarker measurements. Supplemental R code for our approach are included. Highlights • Methodological paper to introduce item response theory for calculating allostatic load.• Biomarker data from NHANES 2015–2016 representative of United States adults.• Body-mass-index and C-reactive protein most informative for allostatic load.• Item response theory captures more variability in allostatic load compared to sum-scores.• Future work - item response theory can standardize allostatic load across datasets.

Project description:BackgroundThe International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) proposes three main health outcomes, Impairment (I), Activity Limitation (A) and Participation Restriction (P), but good measures of these constructs are needed The aim of this study was to use both Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods to carry out an item analysis to improve measurement of these three components in patients having joint replacement surgery mainly for osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA geographical cohort of patients about to undergo lower limb joint replacement was invited to participate. Five hundred and twenty four patients completed ICF items that had been previously identified as measuring only a single ICF construct in patients with osteoarthritis. There were 13 I, 26 A and 20 P items. The SF-36 was used to explore the construct validity of the resultant I, A and P measures. The CTT and IRT analyses were run separately to identify items for inclusion or exclusion in the measurement of each construct. The results from both analyses were compared and contrasted.ResultsOverall, the item analysis resulted in the removal of 4 I items, 9 A items and 11 P items. CTT and IRT identified the same 14 items for removal, with CTT additionally excluding 3 items, and IRT a further 7 items. In a preliminary exploration of reliability and validity, the new measures appeared acceptable.ConclusionNew measures were developed that reflect the ICF components of Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction for patients with advanced arthritis. The resulting Aberdeen IAP measures (Ab-IAP) comprising I (Ab-I, 9 items), A (Ab-A, 17 items), and P (Ab-P, 9 items) met the criteria of conventional psychometric (CTT) analyses and the additional criteria (information and discrimination) of IRT. The use of both methods was more informative than the use of only one of these methods. Thus combining CTT and IRT appears to be a valuable tool in the development of measures.

Dataset Information

Assessing gait efficacy in older adults: An analysis using item response theory.

Publications

Assessing gait efficacy in older adults: An analysis using item response theory.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets