Dataset Information

Outcomes of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Cirrhosis.

ABSTRACT: To better describe the outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients with cirrhosis. Design:Single-center, retrospective study of mechanically ventilated patients with cirrhosis between 2008 and 2015. Setting:ICU at a large academic medical and transplant center. Patients:One hundred eighty-one mechanically ventilated patients with cirrhosis. Interventions:Demographic and clinical data were reviewed, and acute respiratory distress syndrome was identified per Berlin criteria. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics on ICU admission in patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was hospital mortality (including discharge to hospice). Mortality risk was stratified by Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease. Measurements and Main Results:The mean age in 181 eligible patients was 53 ± 11 years; 67% were male; and 91% were Caucasian. In all, n = 35 (19%) of mechanically ventilated patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome. They were more frequently female (46% vs 30%; p = 0.08), with suspected infection (86% vs 53%; p < 0.001), and had higher mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (32 vs 24; p < 0.001) and Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (15 vs 11; p < 0.001) than patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. Hospital mortality was higher in patients with (40%) versus without (22%) acute respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.03). In the risk-adjusted analysis (for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and age), acute respiratory distress syndrome was not independently associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.80; CI, 0.3-2.5; p = 0.7). Conclusions:Acute respiratory distress syndrome is common in mechanically ventilated patients with cirrhosis but is not independently associated with increased mortality.

SUBMITTER: Boente RD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7063938 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSome unanswered questions persist regarding the effectiveness of corticosteroids for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of corticosteroids on intensive care unit (ICU) mortality among mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data conducted in 70 ICUs (68 Spanish, one Andorran, one Irish), including mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS patients admitted between February 6 and September 20, 2020. Individuals who received corticosteroids for refractory shock were excluded. Patients exposed to corticosteroids at admission were matched with patients without corticosteroids through propensity score matching. Primary outcome was all-cause ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes were to compare in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days at 28 days, respiratory superinfection and length of stay between patients with corticosteroids and those without corticosteroids. We performed survival analysis accounting for competing risks and subgroup sensitivity analysis.ResultsWe included 1835 mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS, of whom 1117 (60.9%) received corticosteroids. After propensity score matching, ICU mortality did not differ between patients treated with corticosteroids and untreated patients (33.8% vs. 30.9%; p = 0.28). In survival analysis, corticosteroid treatment at ICU admission was associated with short-term survival benefit (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.39-0.72), although beyond the 17th day of admission, this effect switched and there was an increased ICU mortality (long-term HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.16-2.45). The sensitivity analysis reinforced the results. Subgroups of age < 60 years, severe ARDS and corticosteroids plus tocilizumab could have greatest benefit from corticosteroids as short-term decreased ICU mortality without long-term negative effects were observed. Larger length of stay was observed with corticosteroids among non-survivors both in the ICU and in hospital. There were no significant differences for the remaining secondary outcomes.ConclusionsOur results suggest that corticosteroid treatment for mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS had a biphasic time-dependent effect on ICU mortality. Specific subgroups showed clear effect on improving survival with corticosteroid use. Therefore, further research is required to identify treatment-responsive subgroups among the mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS patients.

Project description:Objectives: There are limited data regarding the efficacy of methylprednisolone in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. We aimed to determine whether methylprednisolone is associated with increases in the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) among these patients. Design: Retrospective single-center study. Setting: Intensive care unit. Patients: All patients with ARDS due to confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation between 1 March and 29 May 2020 were included. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was ventilator-free days (VFDs) for the first 28 days. Defined as being alive and free from mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was analyzed with competing-risks regression based on Fine and Gray's proportional sub hazards model. Death before day 28 was considered to be the competing event. A total of 77 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-two patients (41.6%) received methylprednisolone. The median dose was 1 mg·kg-1 (IQR: 1-1.3 mg·kg-1) and median duration for 5 days (IQR: 5-7 days). Patients who received methylprednisolone had a mean 18.8 VFDs (95% CI, 16.6-20.9) during the first 28 days vs. 14.2 VFDs (95% CI, 12.6-16.7) in patients who did not receive methylprednisolone (difference, 4.61, 95% CI, 1.10-8.12, p = 0.001). In the multivariable competing-risks regression analysis and after adjusting for potential confounders (ventilator settings, prone position, organ failure support, severity of the disease, tocilizumab, and inflammatory markers), methylprednisolone was independently associated with a higher number of VFDs (subhazards ratio: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.45, p = 0.003). Hospital mortality did not differ between the two groups (31.2% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.82). Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the methylprednisolone group (24 days [IQR: 15-41 days] vs. 37 days [IQR: 23-52 days], p = 0.046). The incidence of positive blood cultures was higher in patients who received methylprednisolone (37.5% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.052). However, 81% of patients who received methylprednisolone also received tocilizumab. The number of days with hyperglycemia was similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Methylprednisolone was independently associated with increased VFDs and shortened hospital length of stay. The combination of methylprednisolone and tocilizumab was associated with a higher rate of positive blood cultures. Further trials are needed to evaluate the benefits and safety of methylprednisolone in moderate or severe COVID-19 ARDS.

Dataset Information

Outcomes of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Cirrhosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets