Viewing the Community-acquired Pneumonia Guidelines through an Antibiotic Stewardship Lens.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Fabre V
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7068831 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Viewing the Community-acquired Pneumonia Guidelines through an Antibiotic Stewardship Lens.
Fabre Valeria V Spivak Emily S ES Keller Sara C SC
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 20200301 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundIn community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the role of biomarkers to shorten duration of antibiotic treatment has not been firmly established. We assessed the effectiveness of active feedback of treatment algorithms based on procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP), compared to standard care, on the duration of antibiotic treatment in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in non-ICU wards.Methods and findingsWe performed a randomised, open label, parallel group, multi-centre trial in 3 Dutch teaching hospitals. Treatment was guided by a PCT algorithm, CRP algorithm or standard care. Participants were recruited by a member of the study team and randomised at day 2-3 of admission in a 1:1:1 ratio. Treatment was discontinued upon predefined thresholds of biomarkers that were assessed on admission, day 4 and days 5-7 if indicated. The primary outcome was total days on antibiotic treatment until day 30. In total 468 participants were included in this study. The median days on antibiotics (IQR) was 7 (IQR 7-10) in the control group, 4 (IQR 3-7) in the CRP group (rate ratio (RR) of 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.82 compared to standard care; p <0.001), and 5.5 (IQR 3-9) in the PCT group (RR of 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89 compared to standard care; p <0.001). New antibiotics within the first 30 days were prescribed to 24, 23 and 35 patients in standard care, CRP and PCT groups, respectively. The hazard ratio for a new prescription in patients in the PCT group compared to standard care 1.63 (CI 0.97-2.75; p = 0.06). No difference in time to clinical stability or length of stay was found.ConclusionsA strategy of feedback of CRP-guided and PCT-guided treatment algorithms reduced the number of days on antibiotic in the first 30 days after hospital admission in non-ICU wards for CAP. The study was not powered to determine safety of shortening duration of antibiotic treatment. (NCT01964495).
| S-EPMC11335096 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCurrent approaches for pathogen identification in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remain suboptimal, leaving most patients without a microbiological diagnosis. If better diagnostic tools were available for differentiating between viral and bacterial CAP, unnecessary antibacterial therapy could be avoided in viral CAP patients.MethodsIn 156 adults hospitalized with CAP classified to have bacterial, viral, or mixed viral-bacterial infection based on microbiological testing or both microbiological testing and procalcitonin (PCT) levels, we aimed to identify discriminatory host transcriptional signatures in peripheral blood samples acquired at hospital admission, by applying Dual-color-Reverse-Transcriptase-Multiplex-Ligation-dependent-Probe-Amplification (dc-RT MLPA).ResultsIn patients classified by microbiological testing, a 9-transcript signature showed high accuracy for discriminating bacterial from viral CAP (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.96), while a 10-transcript signature similarly discriminated mixed viral-bacterial from viral CAP (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.96). In patients classified by both microbiological testing and PCT levels, a 13-transcript signature showed excellent accuracy for discriminating bacterial from viral CAP (AUC 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.00), while a 7-transcript signature similarly discriminated mixed viral-bacterial from viral CAP (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.98).ConclusionOur findings support host transcriptional signatures in peripheral blood samples as a potential tool for guiding clinical decision-making and antibiotic stewardship in CAP.
| S-EPMC9174553 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background. Syndrome-specific interventions are a recommended approach to antibiotic stewardship, but additional data are needed to understand their potential impact. We implemented an intervention to improve the management of inpatient community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and evaluated its effects on antibiotic and resource utilization. Methods. A stakeholder group developed and implemented a clinical practice guideline and order set for inpatient, non-intensive care unit CAP recommending a short course (5 days) of a fluoroquinolone-sparing antibiotic regimen in uncomplicated cases. Unless there was suspicion for complications or resistant pathogens, chest computed tomography (CT) and sputum cultures were discouraged. This was a retrospective preintervention postintervention study of patients hospitalized for CAP before (April 15, 2008-May 31, 2009) and after (July 1, 2011-July 31, 2012) implementation of the guideline. The primary comparison was the difference in duration of therapy during the baseline and intervention periods. Secondary outcomes included changes in use of levofloxacin, CT scans, and sputum culture. Results. One hundred sixty-six and 84 cases during the baseline and intervention periods, respectively, were included. From the baseline to intervention period, the median duration of therapy decreased from 10 to 7 days (P < .0001). Prescription of levofloxacin at discharge decreased from 60% to 27% of cases (P < .0001). Use of chest CT and sputum culture decreased from 47% to 32% of cases (P = .02) and 51% to 31% of cases (P = .03), respectively. The frequency of clinical failure between the 2 periods was similar. Conclusions. A syndrome-specific intervention for inpatient CAP was associated with shorter treatment durations and reductions in use of fluoroquinolones and low-yield diagnostic tests.
| S-EPMC5063573 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11201020 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of hospitalizations and mortality in the US. Overuse of extended spectrum antibiotics (ESA) for CAP contributes to antimicrobial resistance. The 2019 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society CAP guidelines emphasize de-escalation of ESA following negative cultures, early switch to oral (PO) antibiotics, and limited duration of therapy (DOT). This study describes clinicians' acceptance of an infectious diseases-trained (ID) pharmacist-led stewardship recommendations in hospitalized patients with CAP.MethodsThis prospective, single-arm, cohort study included adults admitted with a diagnosis of pneumonia to six Cleveland Clinic hospitals receiving ID pharmacist-led stewardship recommendations. The ID pharmacist provided recommendations for ESA de-escalation, DOT, intravenous (IV) to PO transition, and antimicrobial discontinuation. Descriptive statistics were used to describe clinician acceptance rates.ResultsFrom November 1, 2022, to January 31, 2024, the ID pharmacist made recommendations for 685 patient encounters to 327 clinicians. Of these patients, 52% received an ESA and 15% had severe CAP. There were 959 recommendations: ESA de-escalation (19%), DOT (46%), IV to PO transition (19%), antimicrobial discontinuation (13%), and other (3%). Clinicians accepted 693 recommendations (72%): IV to PO transition (148/184, 80%), ESA de-escalation (141/181 78%), antimicrobial discontinuation (94/128, 73%), DOT (286/437, 65%), and other (24/29, 83%).ConclusionClinicians were generally receptive to ID pharmacist-led CAP recommendations with an overall acceptance rate of 72%. Prescribers were most receptive to recommendations for IV to PO conversion and least receptive to limiting DOT.
| S-EPMC11500263 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7233347 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To assess the adherence to Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines and the causes of lack of adherence during empirical antibiotic prescription in severe pneumonia in Latin America.A clinical questionnaire was submitted to 36 physicians from Latin America; they were asked to indicate the empirical treatment in two fictitious cases of severe respiratory infection: community-acquired pneumonia and nosocomial pneumonia.In the case of community acquired pneumonia, 11 prescriptions of 36 (30.6%) were compliant with international guidelines. The causes for non-compliant treatment were monotherapy (16.0%), the unnecessary prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics (40.0%) and the use of non-recommended antibiotics (44.0%). In the case of nosocomial pneumonia, the rate of adherence to the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines was 2.8% (1 patient of 36). The reasons for lack of compliance were monotherapy (14.3%) and a lack of dual antibiotic coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (85.7%). If monotherapy with an antipseudomonal antibiotic was considered adequate, the antibiotic treatment would be adequate in 100% of the total prescriptions.The compliance rate with the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines in the community-acquired pneumonia scenario was 30.6%; the most frequent cause of lack of compliance was the indication of monotherapy. In the case of nosocomial pneumonia, the compliance rate with the guidelines was 2.8%, and the most important cause of non-adherence was lack of combined antipseudomonal therapy. If the use of monotherapy with an antipseudomonal antibiotic was considered the correct option, the treatment would be adequate in 100% of the prescriptions.
| S-EPMC4396896 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat with millions of deaths annually attributable to bacterial resistance. Effective antimicrobial stewardship programs are crucial for optimizing antibiotic use. This study aims to identify factors contributing to deviations from antibiotic treatment guidelines in hospitalized adults with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).MethodsWe conducted a prospective study at Haukeland University Hospital's Emergency Department in Bergen, Norway, from September 2020 to April 2023. Patients were selected from two cohorts, with data on clinical and microbiologic test results collected. We analysed adherence of antibiotic therapy to guidelines for the choice of empirical treatment and therapy duration using multivariate regression models to identify predictors of non-adherence.ResultsOf the 523 patients studied, 479 (91.6%) received empirical antibiotic therapy within 48 h of admission, with 382 (79.7%) adhering to guidelines. However, among the 341 patients included in the analysis of treatment duration adherence, only 69 (20.2%) received therapy durations that were consistent with guideline recommendations. Key predictors of longer-than-recommended therapy duration included a C-reactive protein (CRP) level exceeding 100 mg/L (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.18-1.59) and a hospital stay longer than two days (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.43). The primary factor contributing to extended antibiotic therapy duration was planned post-discharge treatment. No significant temporal trends in adherence to treatment duration guidelines were observed following the publication of the updated guidelines.ConclusionWhile adherence to guidelines for the choice of empirical antibiotic therapy was relatively high, adherence to guidelines for therapy duration was significantly lower, largely due to extended post-discharge antibiotic treatment. Our findings suggest that publishing updated guidelines alone is insufficient to change clinical practice. Targeted stewardship interventions, particularly those addressing discharge practices, are essential. Future research should compare adherence rates across institutions to identify factors contributing to higher adherence and develop standardized benchmarks for optimal antibiotic stewardship. Trial registration NCT04660084.
| S-EPMC11585212 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceLower respiratory tract (LRT) infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), are a leading cause of hospital admissions and mortality. Molecular tests have the potential to optimize treatment decisions and management of CAP, but limited evidence exists to support their routine use.ObjectiveTo determine whether the judicious use of a syndromic polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based panel for rapid testing of CAP in the emergency department (ED) leads to faster, more accurate microbiological test result-based treatment.Design, setting, and participantsThis parallel-arm, single-blinded, single-center, randomized clinical superiority trial was conducted between September 25, 2020, and June 21, 2022, in the ED of Haukeland University Hospital, a large tertiary care hospital in Bergen, Norway. Adult patients who presented to the ED with suspected CAP were recruited. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention arm or standard-of-care arm. The primary outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.InterventionPatients randomized to the intervention arm received rapid syndromic PCR testing (BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus Panel; bioMérieux) of LRT samples and standard of care. Patients randomized to the standard-of-care arm received standard microbiological diagnostics alone.Main outcomes and measuresThe 2 primary outcomes were the provision of pathogen-directed treatment based on a microbiological test result and the time to provision of pathogen-directed treatment (within 48 hours after randomization).ResultsThere were 374 patients (221 males [59.1%]; median (IQR) age, 72 [60-79] years) included in the trial, with 187 in each treatment arm. Analysis of primary outcomes showed that 66 patients (35.3%) in the intervention arm and 25 (13.4%) in the standard-of-care arm received pathogen-directed treatment, corresponding to a reduction in absolute risk of 21.9 (95% CI, 13.5-30.3) percentage points and an odds ratio for the intervention arm of 3.53 (95% CI, 2.13-6.02; P < .001). The median (IQR) time to provision of pathogen-directed treatment within 48 hours was 34.5 (31.6-37.3) hours in the intervention arm and 43.8 (42.0-45.6) hours in the standard-of-care arm (mean difference, -9.4 hours; 95% CI, -12.7 to -6.0 hours; P < .001). The corresponding hazard ratio for intervention compared with standard of care was 3.08 (95% CI, 1.95-4.89). Findings remained significant after adjustment for season.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this randomized clinical trial indicated that routine deployment of PCR testing for LRT pathogens led to faster and more targeted microbial treatment for patients with suspected CAP. Rapid molecular testing could complement or replace selected standard, time-consuming, laboratory-based diagnostics.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04660084.
| S-EPMC10918504 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) are common complications in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients, and are frequently associated with unfavorable outcome as well as prolonged antibiotic therapy. In this study, we intended to clarify whether clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) and multiple serum biomarkers are valuable in predicting unfavorable outcomes and prolonged antibiotic therapy in adult IIM patients complicated with CAP or HAP.MethodsData of IIM patients with CAP or HAP who were admitted to three tertiary centers from December 2010 to November 2019 were retrospectively collected. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and logistic regression analysis were adopted to identify risk factors for unfavorable outcomes and prolonged antibiotic therapy in these patients. The predictive values of potential predictors were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.ResultsThe mortality rate was 60.6% in 109 IIM patients complicated with CAP or HAP. Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Visual Analogue Scales (MYOACT) score, CPIS and timely adjustment to antibiotics based on drug susceptibility test (DST-based antibiotic) were significantly associated with long-term outcome in these patients. With an optimal cutoff value of 6.5 and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813, CPIS was a more satisfying predictor compared with MYOACT score. The peak C-reactive protein (CRP) level, DST-based antibiotics, and complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) were also significantly correlated with prolonged antibiotic therapy.ConclusionsIIM patients complicated with CAP or HAP frequently suffer from unfavorable outcomes. Compared with IIM disease activity, CPIS worked as a better predictor of outcome in these patients. Also, the peak CRP level during hospitalization might be valuable in predicting prolonged antibiotic therapy. The existence of ILD might impede early discontinuation of antibiotics. Timely adjustment to antibiotics based on drug susceptibility testing would decrease the mortality rate and reduce the incidence of prolonged antibiotic therapy.
| S-EPMC7768600 | biostudies-literature