Dataset Information

Evaluating Surgical Resection Extent and Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Gliosarcoma.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Gliosarcomas are clinically aggressive tumors, histologically distinct from glioblastoma. Data regarding the impact of extent of resection and post-operative adjuvant therapy on gliosarcoma outcomes are limited. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed gliosarcoma diagnosed between 1999 and 2019 were identified. Clinical, molecular, and radiographic data were assembled based on historical records. Comparisons of categorical variables used Pearson's Chi-square and Fisher's exact test while continuous values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Survival comparisons were assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and Cox regressions. Results: Seventy-one gliosarcoma patients were identified. Secondary gliosarcoma was not associated with worse survival when compared to recurrent primary gliosarcoma (median survival 9.8 [3.8 to 21.0] months vs. 7.6 [1.0 to 35.7], p = 0.7493). On multivariable analysis, receipt of temozolomide (HR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.001-0.21) and achievement of gross total resection (GTR; HR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.77) were independently prognostic for improved progression-free survival (PFS) while only receipt of temozolomide was independently associated with extended overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.03, 95% CI 0.001-0.89). In patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide, achievement of GTR was significantly associated with improved PFS (median 32.97 [7.1-79.6] months vs. 5.45 [1.8-26.3], p = 0.0092) and OS (median 56.73 months [7.8-104.5] vs. 14.83 [3.8 to 29.1], p = 0.0252). Conclusion: Multimodal therapy is associated with improved survival in gliosarcoma. Even in patients receiving aggressive post-operative multimodal management, total surgical removal of macroscopic disease remains important for optimal outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Jin MC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7078164 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluating Surgical Resection Extent and Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Gliosarcoma.

Jin Michael C MC Liu Elisa K EK Shi Siyu S Gibbs Iris C IC Thomas Reena R Recht Lawrence L Soltys Scott G SG Pollom Erqi L EL Chang Steven D SD Hayden Gephart Melanie M Nagpal Seema S Li Gordon G

Frontiers in oncology 20200311

<b>Introduction:</b> Gliosarcomas are clinically aggressive tumors, histologically distinct from glioblastoma. Data regarding the impact of extent of resection and post-operative adjuvant therapy on gliosarcoma outcomes are limited. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with histologically confirmed gliosarcoma diagnosed between 1999 and 2019 were identified. Clinical, molecular, and radiographic data were assembled based on historical records. Comparisons of categorical variables used Pearson's Chi-square a ...[more]

PMID: 32219069

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe role of surgical resection in the treatment of brainstem glioma (BSG) is poorly understood. For pediatric low-grade (LGBSG) group, several monocentric small-scale retrospective studies reported contradictory conclusions. And there was no clinical study focused on surgical resection for adult or pediatric high-grade (HG) patient groups. This study aims to illustrate whether surgical resection and adjuvant therapy provide survival benefits for patients with histologically confirmed BSG.Patients and methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 529 patients with histologically confirmed BSG in Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2006-2015. Patients were divided into four groups by age and World Health Organization (WHO) grade. Kaplan-Meier curves of CSS were plotted by different treatment options to compare the survival probability. Univariate and multivariable analyses were then conducted to determine the prognosis effects of surgical resection and adjuvant therapy on cancer specific survival (CSS). All analyses were done in four different groups separately.ResultsThe final sample included 529 patients. The entire study population was divided into groups of pediatric LG (n=236, 44.6%), pediatric HG (n=37, 7.0%), adult LG (n=204, 38.6%) and adult HG (n=52, 9.8%). 52.7% (n=144) of pediatric patients had pilocytic astrocytoma and 45.3% (n=116) of adult patients had ependymoma. Pediatric LGBSG group had the highest gross total resection (GTR) rate (61.4%) and 5-year CSS rate (88.6%). Kaplan-Meier curves of pediatric LGBSG group revealed that patients treated with GTR had significantly better survival probability (P=0.033). Multivariable analysis identified GTR as independently significant predictor for prolonged CSS in pediatric LGBSG group (HR0.29, 95%CI 0.11-0.78, P=0.015); Surgical resection showed no relation to CSS in other patient groups. Kaplan-Meier curves of adult HGBSG group showed that patients treated with both RT and CT in adult HGBSG group had the best survival probability (P=0.02). However, multivariable analysis showed the combination of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) was not significantly related to better CSS in adult HGBSG group (HR0.35, 95%CI 0.11-1.09, P=0.070). Adjuvant therapy didn't associate with better CSS in other patient groups.ConclusionPediatric LGBSG group had the highest GTR rate and the most favorable clinical outcome. GTR can provide significant survival benefits for pediatric LGBSG group.

Project description:BackgroundThe role of chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma is controversial. Though many patients undergo initial curative resection, distant metastasis is a frequent event, resulting in 5-year overall survival rates of only 50-60%. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) has been applied to achieve pre-operative cytoreduction, assess chemosensitivity, and to eliminate occult metastasis. Here we report on the results of our non-randomized phase II study on neo-adjuvant treatment for high-risk STS.MethodPatients with potentially curative high-risk STS (size ≥ 5 cm, deep/extracompartimental localization, tumor grades II-III [FNCLCC]) were included. The protocol comprised 4 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (EIA, etoposide 125 mg/m(2) iv days 1 and 4, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 iv days 1 - 4, doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, pegfilgrastim 6 mg sc day 5), definitive surgery with intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and 4 adjuvant cycles of EIA.ResultBetween 06/2005 and 03/2010 a total of 50 subjects (male = 33, female = 17, median age 50.1 years) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 30.5 months. The majority of primary tumors were located in the extremities or trunk (92%), 6% originated in the abdomen/retroperitoneum. Response by RECIST criteria to neo-adjuvant CTX was 6% CR (n = 3), 24% PR (n = 12), 62% SD (n = 31) and 8% PD (n = 4). Local recurrence occurred in 3 subjects (6%). Distant metastasis was observed in 12 patients (24%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 2 years was 83% and 68%, respectively. Multivariate analysis failed to prove influence of resection status or grade of histological necrosis on OS or DFS. Severe toxicities included neutropenic fever (4/50), cardiac toxicity (2/50), and CNS toxicity (4/50) leading to CTX dose reductions in 4 subjects. No cases of secondary leukemias were observed so far.ConclusionThe current protocol is feasible for achieving local control rates, as well as OS and DFS comparable to previously published data on neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. However, the definitive role of chemotherapy remains unclear in the absence of large, randomized trials. Therefore, the current regimen can only be recommended within a clinical study, and a possibly increased risk of secondary leukemias has to be taken into account.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01382030, EudraCT 2004-002501-72.

Project description:BACKGROUD:Resection is still the only potentially curative treatment for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but the prognosis remains far from satisfactory. However, the benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial, although it has been conducted prevalently. Hence, a meta-analysis was warranted to evaluate the effect of AT for patients with ICC after resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS:PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science were used to identify potentially eligible studies from Jan.1st 1990 to Aug. 31st 2019, investigating the effect of AT for patients with ICC after resection. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size. RESULTS:22 studies with 10181 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 832 patients in the chemotherapy group, 309 patients in the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) group, 1192 patients in the radiotherapy group, 235 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group, and 6424 patients in the non-AT group. The pooled HR for the OS rate and RFS rate in the AT group were 0.63 (95%CI 0.52~0.74), 0.74 (95%CI 0.58~0.90), compared with the non-AT group. Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled HR for the OS rate in the AT group compared with non-AT group were as follows: chemotherapy group was 0.57 (95%CI = 0.44~0.70), TACE group was 0.56 (95%CI = 0.31~0.82), radiotherapy group was 0.71 (95%CI = 0.39~1.03), chemoradiotherapy group was 0.73 (95%CI = 0.57~0.89), positive resection margin group was 0.60 (95%CI = 0.51~0.69), and lymph node metastasis (LNM) group was 0.67 (95%CI = 0.57~0.76). CONCLUSION:With the current data, we concluded that AT such as chemotherapy, TACE and chemoradiotherapy could benefit patients with ICC after resection, especially those with positive resection margin and LNM, but the conclusion needed to be furtherly confirmed.

Dataset Information

Evaluating Surgical Resection Extent and Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Gliosarcoma.

Publications

Evaluating Surgical Resection Extent and Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Gliosarcoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets