Dataset Information

Clonal Relationship Between Lichen Sclerosus, Differentiated Vulvar Intra-epithelial Neoplasia and Non HPV-related Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND/AIM:Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) and lichen sclerosus (LS) can give rise to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), but genetic evidence is currently still limited. We aimed to determine genetic abnormalities in VSCC and backtrack these abnormalities in the dVIN and LS lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS:DNA from VSCC and patient-matched dVIN and LS samples of twelve patients was collected. High-resolution genome-wide copy number analysis was performed and subsequently, we sequenced TP53. RESULTS:Copy number alterations were identified in all VSCC samples. One dVIN lesion presented with three copy number alterations that were preserved in the paired VSCC sample. Targeted sequencing of TP53 identified mutations in five VSCCs. All five mutations were traced back in the dVIN (n=5) or the LS (n=1) with frequencies ranging from 3-19%. CONCLUSION:Our data provide genetic evidence for a clonal relationship between VSCC and dVIN or LS.

SUBMITTER: Pouwer AW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7078831 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar-Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clonal Relationship Between Lichen Sclerosus, Differentiated Vulvar Intra-epithelial Neoplasia and Non HPV-related Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Pouwer Anne-Floor W AW VAN DEN Einden Loes C G LCG VAN DER Linden Michelle M Hehir-Kwa Jayne Y JY Yu Jiangyan J Hendriks Koen M KM Kamping Eveline J EJ Eijkelenboom Astrid A Massuger Leon F A G LFAG Bulten Johan J VAN Tilborg Angela A G AAG DE Hullu Joanne A JA Kuiper Roland P RP

Cancer genomics & proteomics 20200301 2

<h4>Background/aim</h4>Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) and lichen sclerosus (LS) can give rise to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), but genetic evidence is currently still limited. We aimed to determine genetic abnormalities in VSCC and backtrack these abnormalities in the dVIN and LS lesions.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>DNA from VSCC and patient-matched dVIN and LS samples of twelve patients was collected. High-resolution genome-wide copy number analysis was perform ...[more]

PMID: 32108037

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Molecular alterations in lichen sclerosus-associated vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (LS-VSCC) are largely unknown. Objective:To determine whether the retinoic acid receptor ? (RAR?) tumor-suppressor gene is involved in the onset and/or progression of LS-VSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants:The case-control study, conducted at University-Hospital of Ferrara, Italy, included 20 LS-VSCC (mean [SD] age, 75 [3] years) and 20 cancer-associated vulvar LS (caVLS; mean [SD] age, 62 [11] years) formalin-fixed embedded tissue specimens, 20 cancer-free vulvar LS (cfVLS), and 20 normal skin fresh specimens from diagnostic biopsies and women surgically treated for nonmalignant skin lesions, respectively. RAR? gene expression and promoter methylation were investigated in LS-VSCC and caVLS adjacent to VSCC specimens, and in cfVLS and normal skin specimens, as controls, by RT-Q real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, and sequencing of PCR-amplified bisulfite-treated DNA. c-Jun expression, an RAR? pathway-related gene, was also investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures:RAR? expression, correlation with its promoter methylation and c-Jun expression, and association with onset or progression of LS-VSCC. Results:In LS-VSCC, RAR? messenger RNA was 3.4-, 3.6-, and 4.8-fold lower than in caVLS (P?=?.001), cfVLS (P?=?.005), and normal skin (P?<?.001), respectively. The RAR? mRNA levels were similar in caVLS, cfVLS, and normal skin. The RAR? promoter was hypermethylated in 18 (90%) of 20 LS-VSCC, 11 (55%) of 20 cfVLS, 10 (50%) of 20 caVLS, and 5 (25%) of 20 in the normal skin group. The degree of methylation of RAR? promoter was higher in LS-VSCC, ranging from 5 to 9 (full promoter methylation) CpGs methylated, than in caVLS (P?=?.02), cfVLS (P?=?.03), or normal skin (P?<?.001), which was up to 5 CpGs methylated. Importantly, 0 of 8 LS-VSCC with 5 to 6 CpGs methylated and 5 (63%) of 8 LS-VSCC with 7 to 8 CpGs methylated were from patients with lymph node metastasis at diagnosis, respectively, whereas there were 2 of 2 (100%) LS-VSCC samples with 9 CpG methylated from patients with lymph node metastasis at diagnosis and subsequent recurrence. In LS-VSCC c-Jun mRNA was 4.3-, 1.4-, and 2.6-fold higher than in caVLS (P?<?.001), cfVLS (P?=?.001), and normal skin (P?<?.001), respectively. The expression of c-Jun was similar in caVLS, cfVLS, and normal skin. Conclusions and Relevance:Hypermethylation-induced RAR? down-expression was associated with LS-VSCC and correlates with the upregulation of c-Jun. The degree of methylation of RAR? promoter increased with the malignancy of LS-VSCC. Therefore, RAR? gene dysregulation may play a role in progression of LS-VSCC, and RAR? promoter methylation status may be used as a prognostic marker in clinical treatment of patients with LS-VSCC.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study was to describe the demographic, clinical, and histopathologic features of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) and vulvar aberrant maturation (VAM). METHODS:Specimens from 2010 to 2020 reported as dVIN or VAM were reviewed. Clinical data included age, rurality, symptoms, and evidence of lichen sclerosus (LS). Histopathologic data included epithelial thickness, keratinization, architectural and dyskeratotic features, stroma, p16, and p53. Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and VAM were distinguished by assessment of basal nuclear chromatin, enlargement, pleomorphism, and mitoses. RESULTS:One hundred twenty women with a median age of 71 years had 179 examples of dVIN and VAM. Squamous cell carcinoma was concurrent in 66% and associated with rurality. Ten percent were asymptomatic, and all but 3 had evidence of LS. Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia showed a range of thickness, architecture, and dyskeratosis; its unifying !feature was basal atypia. Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia displayed hyperchromasia in 83% and easily observed mitoses in 70%. Nonkeratinizing morphology, subcategorized into basaloid and intermediate, occurred in 24% of women with dVIN. Traditional dVIN represented 62% of keratinizing cases; the remainder were atrophic (13%), hypertrophic (13%), acantholytic (8%), or subtle (5%). Vulvar aberrant maturation had abnormal stratum corneum, acanthosis, premature maturation, and enlarged vesicular nuclei. Null p53 helped distinguish dVIN from VAM and dermatoses. CONCLUSIONS:The morphology of dVIN encompasses nonkeratinizing and keratinizing types, the latter subdivided into traditional, acantholytic, atrophic, hypertrophic, and subtle. Diagnosis relies on basal atypia with supportive p16 and p53. Atypia exists on a biologic spectrum with mild abnormalities of VAM and reactive change. Identification of dVIN and VAM requires collaboration between clinicians and pathologists experienced in vulvar disorders.

Project description:ObjectiveTo estimate the efficacy of fractionated carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, trial conducted in a clinic specializing in vulvar disorders. The study participants were 40 women with active vulvar lichen sclerosus confirmed with biopsy who were abstaining from topical and systemic treatments for at least 4 weeks before enrollment. Women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either five sham laser treatments or five fractionated CO2 treatments in a 24-week period. Study participants, treating clinicians, and the evaluating pathologist were blinded. The primary endpoint was the change in the histopathology scale score between pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies. We estimated 20 per group for 80% power to detect a 40% reduction in the histopathology scale score with up to 10% attrition. A secondary endpoint was the change in the validated CSS (Clinical Scoring System for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus).ResultsFrom November 2018 to June 2020, 40 women were randomized to participate in the trial, and 37 women (19 fractionated CO2, 18 sham) were included in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Three women were excluded from the ITT analysis because they did not have posttreatment biopsies and, therefore, a posttreatment histopathology scale score could not be obtained. There was a 0.20 reduction (improvement) in histopathology scale score from baseline in the active treatment group (95% CI -1.1, 0.80, P=.74) and a 0.1 increase from baseline in the sham treatment group (95% CI -0.90, 1.0, P=.91). The change in histopathology scale score between the active and sham arm was not statistically significant (95% CI -1.14, 1.06, P=.76).ConclusionFractionated CO2 is not an effective monotherapy treatment for vulvar lichen sclerosus.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03665584.Funding sourceAdditional funding for this study was supplied by El.En Group, Florence, Italy, the manufacturer of the laser used in this study. In addition, El.En Group supplied the laser used in the study.

Dataset Information

Clonal Relationship Between Lichen Sclerosus, Differentiated Vulvar Intra-epithelial Neoplasia and Non HPV-related Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Publications

Clonal Relationship Between Lichen Sclerosus, Differentiated Vulvar Intra-epithelial Neoplasia and Non HPV-related Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets