Dataset Information

Proteomic research in sarcomas - current status and future opportunities.

ABSTRACT: Sarcomas are a rare group of mesenchymal cancers comprising over 70 different histological subtypes. For the majority of these diseases, the molecular understanding of the basis of their initiation and progression remains unclear. As such, limited clinical progress in prognosis or therapeutic regimens have been made over the past few decades. Proteomics techniques are being increasingly utilised in the field of sarcoma research. Proteomic research efforts have thus far focused on histological subtype characterisation for the improvement of biological understanding, as well as for the identification of candidate diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers for use in clinic. However, the field itself is in its infancy, and none of these proteomic research findings have been translated into the clinic. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the proteomic strategies that have been employed in sarcoma research. We evaluate key proteomic studies concerning several rare and ultra-rare sarcoma subtypes including, gastrointestinal stromal tumours, osteosarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumours, Ewing sarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, and alveolar soft part sarcoma. Consequently, we illustrate how routine implementation of proteomics within sarcoma research, integration of proteomics with other molecular profiling data, and incorporation of proteomics into clinical trial studies has the potential to propel the biological and clinical understanding of this group of complex rare cancers moving forward.

SUBMITTER: Burns J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7083238 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Proteomic research in sarcomas - current status and future opportunities.

Burns Jessica J Wilding Christopher P CP L Jones Robin R H Huang Paul P

Seminars in cancer biology 20191110

Sarcomas are a rare group of mesenchymal cancers comprising over 70 different histological subtypes. For the majority of these diseases, the molecular understanding of the basis of their initiation and progression remains unclear. As such, limited clinical progress in prognosis or therapeutic regimens have been made over the past few decades. Proteomics techniques are being increasingly utilised in the field of sarcoma research. Proteomic research efforts have thus far focused on histological su ...[more]

PMID: 31722230

Similar Datasets

Project description:Development of effective treatments requires understanding of disease mechanisms. For diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), such as multiple sclerosis (MS), human pathology studies and animal models tend to identify candidate disease mechanisms. However, these studies cannot easily link the identified processes to clinical outcomes, such as MS severity, required for causality assessment of candidate mechanisms. Technological advances now allow the generation of thousands of biomarkers in living human subjects, derived from genes, transcripts, medical images, and proteins or metabolites in biological fluids. These biomarkers can be assembled into computational models of clinical value, provided such models are generalizable. Reproducibility of models increases with the technical rigor of the study design, such as blinding, control implementation, the use of large cohorts that encompass the entire spectrum of disease phenotypes and, most importantly, model validation in independent cohort(s). To facilitate the growth of this important research area, we performed a meta-analysis of publications (n = 302) that model MS clinical outcomes extracting effect sizes, while also scoring the technical quality of the study design using predefined criteria. Finally, we generated a Shiny-App-based website that allows dynamic exploration of the data by selective filtering. On average, the published studies fulfilled only one of the seven criteria of study design rigor. Only 15.2% of the studies used any validation strategy, and only 8% used the gold standard of independent cohort validation. Many studies also used small cohorts, e.g., for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and blood biomarker predictors, the median sample size was <100 subjects. We observed inverse relationships between reported effect sizes and the number of study design criteria fulfilled, expanding analogous reports from non-MS fields, that studies that fail to limit bias overestimate effect sizes. In conclusion, the presented meta-analysis represents a useful tool for researchers, reviewers, and funders to improve the design of future modeling studies in MS and to easily compare new studies with the published literature. We expect that this will accelerate research in this important area, leading to the development of robust models with proven clinical value.

Project description:BackgroundThousands of biomarker tests are either available or under development for lung diseases. In many cases, adoption of these tests into clinical practice is outpacing the generation and evaluation of sufficient data to determine clinical utility and ability to improve health outcomes. There is a need for a systematically organized report that provides guidance on how to understand and evaluate use of biomarker tests for lung diseases.MethodsWe assembled a diverse group of clinicians and researchers from the American Thoracic Society and leaders from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute with expertise in various aspects of precision medicine to review the current status of biomarker tests in lung diseases. Experts summarized existing biomarker tests that are available for lung cancer, pulmonary arterial hypertension, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and other rare lung diseases. The group identified knowledge gaps that future research studies can address to efficiently translate biomarker tests into clinical practice, assess their cost-effectiveness, and ensure they apply to diverse, real-life populations.ResultsWe found that the status of biomarker tests in lung diseases is highly variable depending on the disease. Nevertheless, biomarker tests in lung diseases show great promise in improving clinical care. To efficiently translate biomarkers into tests used widely in clinical practice, researchers need to address specific clinical unmet needs, secure support for biomarker discovery efforts, conduct analytical and clinical validation studies, ensure tests have clinical utility, and facilitate appropriate adoption into routine clinical practice.ConclusionsAlthough progress has been made toward implementation of precision medicine for lung diseases in clinical practice in certain settings, additional studies focused on addressing specific unmet clinical needs are required to evaluate the clinical utility of biomarkers; ensure their generalizability to diverse, real-life populations; and determine their cost-effectiveness.

Dataset Information

Proteomic research in sarcomas - current status and future opportunities.

Publications

Proteomic research in sarcomas - current status and future opportunities.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets