Dataset Information

Influence of subfertility and assisted reproductive technology treatment on mortality of women after delivery.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To compare incidence, risk factors, and etiology of women's deaths in fertile, subfertile, and undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the years after delivery.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

University hospital.

Patient(s)

Women who had delivered in Massachusetts.

Intervention(s)

This study used data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System linked to vital records, hospital stays, and the Massachusetts death file. Mortality of patients delivered from 2004-2013 was evaluated through 2015. The exposure groups, determined on the basis of the last delivery, were ART-treated (linked to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System), subfertile (no ART but with indicators of subfertility including birth certificate checkbox for fertility treatment, prior hospitalization for infertility [International Classification of Disease codes 9 628 or V23], and/or prior delivery with checkbox or ART), or fertile (neither ART nor subfertile). Numbers (per 100,000 women-years) and causes of death were obtained from the Massachusetts death file.

Main outcome measure(s)

Mortality of women after delivery in each of the three fertility groups and the most common etiology of death in each.

Result(s)

We included 483,547 women: 16,429 ART, 11,696 subfertile, and 455,422 fertile among whom there were 1,280 deaths with 21.1, 25.5, and 44.7 deaths, respectively, per 100,000 women-years. External causes (violence, accidents, and poisonings) were the most common reasons for death in the fertile group. Deaths occurred on average 46 months after delivery. When external causes of death were removed, there were 19.1, 17.0, and 25.6 deaths per 100,000 women-years and leading causes of death in all groups were cancer and circulatory problems.

Conclusion(s)

The study presents reassuring data that death rates within 5 years of delivery in ART-treated and subfertile women do not differ from those in fertile women.

SUBMITTER: Coddington CC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7088468 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Influence of subfertility and assisted reproductive technology treatment on mortality of women after delivery.

Coddington Charles C CC Gopal Daksha D Cui Xiaohui X Cabral Howard H Diop Hafsatou H Stern Judy E JE

Fertility and sterility 20200207 3

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare incidence, risk factors, and etiology of women's deaths in fertile, subfertile, and undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the years after delivery.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective cohort.<h4>Setting</h4>University hospital.<h4>Patient(s)</h4>Women who had delivered in Massachusetts.<h4>Intervention(s)</h4>This study used data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System linked to vital records, hospital stays, and t ...[more]

PMID: 32044090

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the maternal demographic, health, and fertility variables underlying prematurity.DesignRetrospective: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data linked to Massachusetts birth certificates and hospital stays.SettingNot applicable.PatientsWe included 166,963 privately insured, singleton, first births to women ≥18 years of age between 2004 and 2013. Deliveries were as follows: assisted reproductive technology (ART) when linked to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, medically assisted reproduction (MAR) when fertility treatment was indicated on the birth certificate, unassisted subfertile (USF) when there were indications of subfertility but no treatment, and fertile if none of the above.InterventionNone.Main outcome measuresLate preterm birth (LPTB; 34-36 weeks) and early preterm birth (EPTB; <34 weeks) were compared with term deliveries (≥37 weeks). Covariates that statistically significantly influenced prematurity in binary analysis were modeled by using multinomial logistic regression. Backward elimination and mediation analysis were used to determine the influence of single parameters on outcomes of others.ResultsLPTB was increased in the USF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.65) and ART (AOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.56) but not MAR (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.37). ETPB was increased in all (USF: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.21-2.31; MAR: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12; ART: AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21-1.61). The strongest effectors of prematurity were placental problems (LPTB: AOR 4.02; EPTB: AOR 10.28), pregnancy hypertension (LPTB: AOR 2.14; EPTB: AOR 2.88), and chronic hypertension (LPTB: AOR 1.85; EPTB: AOR 2.79). Mediation analysis demonstrated a statistically significant indirect effect of placental problems for ART and subfertility.ConclusionThe greatest effectors of prematurity were placental problems and hypertensive disorders. ART and, to a lesser extent, subfertility were both associated with preterm birth directly and indirectly mediated by placenta problems.

Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate hospitalizations up to 8 years after live birth among women who used assisted reproductive technology (ART) or who were subfertile compared with women who conceived naturally.DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingDeliveries among privately insured women aged ≥18 years between 2004 and 2017 from Massachusetts state vital records were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System and hospital observational/inpatient stays.Patient(s)We compared patients with ART, medically assisted reproduction (MAR), and unassisted subfertile (USF) delivery with those with fertile delivery.Intervention(s)NA.Main outcome measure(s)Postdelivery hospitalization information was derived from the International Classification of Diseases codes for discharges and combined by type. The relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of hospitalization for up to the first 8 years postdelivery were modeled.Result(s)Among 492,515 deliveries, 5.6% used ART, 1.6% used MAR, and 1.8% were USF. Compared with fertile deliveries, deliveries that used ART or MAR or were USF were more likely to have hospital utilization (inpatient or observational stay) for any reason for up to 8 years of follow-up (USF, adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.25]; MAR, aRR, 1.20 [1.13-1.27]; and ART, aRR, 1.29 [1.25-1.34]). Assisted reproductive technology deliveries had an increased risk of hospitalization for conditions of the cardiovascular system (aRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.20-1.41]), overweight/obesity (aRR, 1.30 [1.17-1.44]), diabetes (aRR, 1.25 [1.05-1.49]), reproductive tract (aRR, 1.62 [1.47-1.79]), digestive tract (aRR, 1.39 [1.30-1.49]), thyroid (aRR, 2.02 [1.80-2.26]), respiratory system (aRR, 1.13 [1.03-1.24]), and cancer (aRR, 1.40 [1.18-1.65]) up to 8 years after delivery. Deliveries with MAR and subfertility had similar patterns of hospitalization as ART deliveries.Conclusion(s)Women who conceived through fertility treatment or experienced subfertility were at increased risk of subsequent hospitalization resulting from a variety of chronic and acute conditions.

Project description:Study questionDo women who give birth after assisted reproductive technology (ART) have an increased risk of cancer compared with women who give birth without ART?Summary answerWithout correction, the results indicate an increase in overall cancer risk, as well as a 50% increase in risk of CNS cancer for women giving birth after ART, however the results were not significant after correcting for multiple analyses.What is known alreadyStudies regarding the effects of hormonal treatments involved with ART on subsequent cancer risk have provided inconsistent results, and it has also been suggested that infertility itself could be a contributory factor.Study design, size, durationA population-based cohort consisting of all women registered in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway as having given birth between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 2010 was assembled (n = 812 986). Cancers were identified by linkage to the Cancer Registry of Norway. Study subjects were followed from start of first pregnancy during the observational period until the first cancer, death, emigration, or 31 December 2010.Participants/materials, setting, methodsOf the total study population (n = 806 248), 16 525 gave birth to a child following ART. Cox regression analysis computed hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing cancer risk between ART women and non-ART women; for overall cancer, and for cervical, ovarian, uterine, central nervous system (CNS), colorectal and thyroid cancers, and for malignant melanoma.Main results and the role of chanceA total of 22 282 cohort members were diagnosed with cancer, of which 338 were ART women and 21 944 non-ART women. The results showed an elevated risk in one out of seven sites for ART women. The HR for cancer of the CNS was 1.50 (95% CI 1.03- 2.18), and among those specifically subjected to IVF (without ICSI) the HR was 1.83 (95% CI 1.22-2.73). Analysis of risk of overall cancer gave an HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.04-1.29). Among those who had delivered only one child by the end of follow-up, the HR for ovarian cancer was 2.00 (95% CI 1.08-3.65), and for those nulliparous at entry the HR was 1.80 (95% CI 1.04-3.11). However, all findings became non-significant after correcting for multiple analyses.Limitations, reasons for cautionThe results of elevated risk of overall cancer and CNS cancer lost significance when adjusting for multiple analyses, implying an important limitation of the study. The follow-up time was relatively short, especially for ART women. In addition, as the cohort was relatively young, there were few incident cancers, especially for some rarer cancer forms, such as uterine cancer. Risk assessments according to different causes of infertility could not be done.Wider implications of the findingsIn light of the findings in the present study, further studies should be made on risk of CNS and ovarian cancer, and continued monitoring of all those treated with ART is encouraged. Our findings may only be generalizable to women who give birth after ART, and the risk for women who remain nulliparous after ART remains to be assessed.Study funding/competing interestThe study was funded by the Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Women's Health. All authors claim no competing interests.

Dataset Information

Influence of subfertility and assisted reproductive technology treatment on mortality of women after delivery.

Objective

Design

Setting

Patient(s)

Intervention(s)

Main outcome measure(s)

Result(s)

Conclusion(s)

Publications

Influence of subfertility and assisted reproductive technology treatment on mortality of women after delivery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets