Dataset Information

Assay-Based Differentiation in the Neutralization Profile of Unfractionated Heparin, Enoxaparin, and Fondaparinux by Andexanet Alfa.

ABSTRACT: Andexanet alfa is a recombinant factor Xa decoy protein, designed to reverse bleeding associated with oral anti-Xa agents. Andexanet alfa is also reported to neutralize the effects of heparin-related drugs. This study focused on the neutralization profiles of unfractionated heparin (UFH), enoxaparin, and, a chemically synthetic pentasaccharide, fondaparinux by andexanet alfa. Whole blood clotting studies were carried out using thromboelastography (TEG) and activated clotting time (ACT). The anticoagulant profile of UFH, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux was studied using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT), and amidolytic anti-Xa, and anti-IIa methods. Thrombin generation inhibition was studied using the calibrated automated thrombogram system. Reversal of each of these agents was studied by supplementing andexanet alfa at 100 µg/mL. In the TEG, andexanet alfa produced almost a complete reversal of the anticoagulant effects of UFH and enoxaparin; however, it augmented the effects of fondaparinux. In the ACT, aPTT, and TT, UFH produced strong anticoagulant effects that were almost completely neutralized by andexanet alfa. Enoxaparin produced milder anticoagulant responses that were partially neutralized, whereas fondaparinux did not produce any sizeable effects. In the anti-Xa and anti-IIa assays, UFH exhibited partial neutralization whereas enoxaparin and fondaparinux did not show any neutralization. All agents produced varying degrees of the inhibition of thrombin generation, which were differentially neutralized by andexanet alfa. These results indicate that andexanet alfa is capable of differentially neutralizing anticoagulant and antiprotease effects of UFH and enoxaparin in an assay-dependent manner. However, andexanet alfa is incapable of neutralizing the anti-Xa effects of fondaparinux.

SUBMITTER: Siddiqui F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7098205 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assay-Based Differentiation in the Neutralization Profile of Unfractionated Heparin, Enoxaparin, and Fondaparinux by Andexanet Alfa.

Siddiqui Fakiha F Tafur Alfonso A Bontekoe Emily E Iqbal Omer O Jeske Walter W Mehrotra Siddharth S Hoppensteadt Debra D Ramacciotti Eduardo E Fareed Jawed J

Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 20200101

Andexanet alfa is a recombinant factor Xa decoy protein, designed to reverse bleeding associated with oral anti-Xa agents. Andexanet alfa is also reported to neutralize the effects of heparin-related drugs. This study focused on the neutralization profiles of unfractionated heparin (UFH), enoxaparin, and, a chemically synthetic pentasaccharide, fondaparinux by andexanet alfa. Whole blood clotting studies were carried out using thromboelastography (TEG) and activated clotting time (ACT). The anti ...[more]

PMID: 31914798

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundObesity is a frequent and significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) among hospitalized adults. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis can help prevent VTE, but real-world effectiveness, safety, and costs among inpatients with obesity are unknown.ObjectiveThis study aims to compare clinical and economic outcomes among adult medical inpatients with obesity who received thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using the PINC AI™ Healthcare Database, which covers more than 850 hospitals in the United States. Patients included were ≥18 years old, had a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of obesity [International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnosis codes 278.01, 278.02, and 278.03; ICD-10 diagnosis codes E66.0x, E66.1, E66.2, E66.8, and E66.9], received ≥1 thromboprophylactic dose of enoxaparin (≤40 mg/day) or UFH (≤15,000 IU/day) during the index hospitalization, stayed ≥6 days in the hospital, and were discharged between 01 January 2010, and 30 September 2016. We excluded surgical patients, patients with pre-existing VTE, and those who received higher (treatment-level) doses or multiple types of anticoagulants. Multivariable regression models were constructed to compare enoxaparin with UFH based on the incidence of VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE)---------related mortality, overall in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, treatment costs, and total hospitalization costs during the index hospitalization and the 90 days after index discharge (readmission period).ResultsAmong 67,193 inpatients who met the selection criteria, 44,367 (66%) and 22,826 (34%) received enoxaparin and UFH, respectively, during their index hospitalization. Demographic, visit-related, clinical, and hospital characteristics differed significantly between groups. Enoxaparin during index hospitalization was associated with 29%, 73%, 30%, and 39% decreases in the adjusted odds of VTE, PE-related mortality, in-hospital mortality, and major bleeding, respectively, compared with UFH (all p < 0.002). Compared with UFH, enoxaparin was associated with significantly lower total hospitalization costs during the index hospitalization and readmission periods.ConclusionsAmong adult inpatients with obesity, primary thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin compared with UFH was associated with significantly lower risks of in-hospital VTE, major bleeding, PE-related mortality, overall in-hospital mortality, and hospitalization costs.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 1996 to May 2011.Study selectionRandomised and non-randomised studies comparing enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention and reporting on both mortality (efficacy end point) and major bleeding (safety end point) outcomes.Data extractionSample size, characteristics, and outcomes, extracted independently and analysed.Data synthesis23 trials representing 30,966 patients were identified, including 10,243 patients (33.1%) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction, 8750 (28.2%) undergoing secondary percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis, and 11,973 (38.7%) with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome or stable patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 13,943 patients (45.0%) received enoxaparin and 17,023 (55.0%) unfractionated heparin. Enoxaparin was associated with significant reductions in death (relative risk 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.76; P<0.001), the composite of death or myocardial infarction (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81; P<0.001), and complications of myocardial infarction (0.75, 0.6 to 0.85; P<0.001), and a reduction in incidence of major bleeding (0.80, 0.68 to 0.95; P=0.009). In patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the reduction in death (0.52, 0.42 to 0.64; P<0.001) was particularly significant and associated with a reduction in major bleeding (0.72, 0.56 to 0.93; P=0.01).ConclusionEnoxaparin seems to be superior to unfractionated heparin in reducing mortality and bleeding outcomes during percutaneous coronary intervention and particularly in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Dataset Information

Assay-Based Differentiation in the Neutralization Profile of Unfractionated Heparin, Enoxaparin, and Fondaparinux by Andexanet Alfa.

Publications

Assay-Based Differentiation in the Neutralization Profile of Unfractionated Heparin, Enoxaparin, and Fondaparinux by Andexanet Alfa.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets