The efficacy and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Aims
The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).Methods
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies. Two authors independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed in RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.Results
Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. In patients with RMS, fingolimod demonstrated a significantly lower annualized relapse rate (0.5 mg/d: mean difference [95% confidence interval] = -0.22 [-0.29 to -0.14]; 1.25 mg/d: -0.26 [-0.36 to -0.16]; 5 mg/d: -0.41 [-0.72 to -0.10]) than placebo. Fingolimod also exhibited a favorable performance on other magnetic resonance imaging outcomes and improved the quality of life in patients. No significant difference was noted in the prevalence of adverse events between the fingolimod treatment group and the placebo/disease-modifying therapy groups.Conclusions
Fingolimod may offer benefits for RMS patients and presents an acceptable safety profile.
SUBMITTER: Yang T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7098866 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Fingolimod was recently approved for use in the United States after two phase III trials confirmed its effectiveness in reducing disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. These positive results, coupled with the important fact that this is the first oral disease-modifying therapy, has lead to considerable enthusiasm amongst physicians and patients. However, fingolimod is associated with rare but serious adverse events. In addition, unlike conventional disease-modifying therapies, cardiopulmonary, ophthalmological and dermatological safety monitoring unfamiliar to both neurologists and patients is required before and during treatment. This paper will discuss these issues from the perspective of using fingolimod as a first-line disease-modifying therapy in treatment-naïve relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.
| S-EPMC3663606 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10401910 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis requiring lifelong treatment, studies on long-term outcomes are important.ObjectiveTo assess disability and magnetic resonance imaging-related outcomes in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients from a Phase 2 study of fingolimod 10 or more years after randomization and to compare outcomes in patients who had a higher fingolimod exposure versus those with a lower fingolimod exposure.MethodsACROSS was a cross-sectional follow-up study of patients originally enrolled in a Phase 2 fingolimod proof-of-concept study (NCT00333138). Disability and magnetic resonance imaging-related outcomes were assessed in patients grouped according to fingolimod treatment duration, based on an arbitrary cut-off: ≥8 years (high exposure) and <8 years (low exposure).ResultsOverall, 175/281 (62%) patients participated in ACROSS; 104 (59%) of these were classified "high exposure." At 10 years, patients in the high-exposure group had smaller increases in Expanded Disability Status Scale (+0.55 vs. +1.21), and lower frequencies of disability progression (34.7% vs. 56.1%), wheelchair use (4.8% vs. 16.9%), or transition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (9.6% vs. 22.5%) than those in the low-exposure group. The high-exposure patients also had less progression in most magnetic resonance imaging-related outcomes.ConclusionAfter 10 years of fingolimod treatment, disability progression was lower in the high-exposure group than in the low-exposure group.
| S-EPMC7132565 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Fingolimod approval was based mainly on two clinical trials, FREEDOMS and TRANSFORMS, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of fingolimod in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We present an observational study that validates these trials findings in a real-world setting, whereby the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod was assessed in Seville's' (Spain) clinical practice. This retrospective study in MS patients assessed effectiveness (relapses, EDSS, gadolinium-enhancing T1 and new/enlarged T2-weighted lesions): total cohort (n = 249) and stratified according to prior treatment (glatiramer acetate/interferon beta-1 [immunomodulator], natalizumab, naïve), gender, basal EDSS score, basal Gd+ lesions, ARR prior to treatment, age at treatment initiation and number of prior treatments. A multivariante model was used to assess the ARR with baseline characteristics. The safety profile (adverse events [AEs]) was also described. Fingolimod reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR) by 75%, 67% and 85% in the total cohort, patients previously treated with immunomodulatory and naïve patients (p<0.0001 all cases). However, patients previously treated with natalizumab kept a constant ARR. The ARR results and the consequent increase in the proportion of relapse-free patients were independent of the age at treatment initiation, number of prior treatments, gender and basal Gd+ lesions. Although fingolimod was effective regardless the basal EDSS score and ARR prior to fingolimod treatment, better outcomes were observed in patients with basal EDSS score <3 (0.2 vs. 0.4; p = 0.0244) and ARR ? 2 prior to fingolimod treatment (p = 0.0338). Only the basal EDSS score was association with ARR in the first 24 months of fingolimod treatment in the multivariante model (p = 0.0439). The cumulative probability of disability progression was 20% (month-24) in the total cohort, and was independent from prior treatment, age at treatment initiation, number of prior treatments, gender, basal EDSS score, basal Gd+ lesions and ARR prior to treatment. The real-world fingolimod benefits observed in this study seem to be similar than those observed in previous clinical trials.
| S-EPMC5409154 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundFingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Despite an established effect on heart rate, the effect of fingolimod on cardiac repolarization is not completely known.MethodsTwenty-seven patients with RRMS underwent 24-hr ambulatory ECG before fingolimod (baseline), at the day of fingolimod initiation (1D) and after three-month treatment (3M). The mean values of RR-interval as well as QT-interval corrected by Bazzet's (QTcBaz) and Fridericia's (QTcFri) formula were compared between baseline, 1D, and 3M over 24-hr period as well as at daytime and nighttime.ResultsQTcBaz over 24-hr was shorter at 1D (414 ± 20 ms, p < .001) and at 3M (414 ± 20 ms, p < .001) than at baseline (418 ± 20 ms). In contrast, QTcFri over 24-hr was longer at 1D (410 ± 19 ms, p < .001) but similar at 3M (406 ± 19 ms, p = .355) compared to baseline (407 ± 19 ms). Daytime QTcBaz was shorter at 1D (p < .001) and at 3M (p = .007), whereas daytime QTcFri was longer at 1D (p < .05) but similar at 3M (p = ns) compared to baseline. During the night, changes were observed neither in QTcBaz nor in QTcFri between baseline, 1D, and 3M.ConclusionsChanges in cardiac repolarization after fingolimod initiation were mild and occurred at daytime. Ambiguously, QTcBaz demonstrated shortening, whereas QTcFri showed prolongation in cardiac repolarization after fingolimod initiation. The formula applied for QT-interval correction needs to be taken carefully into account as evaluating pharmacovigilance issues related to fingolimod.
| S-EPMC5822581 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe low level of disease activity and manageable safety profile seen with fingolimod versus placebo in a 6-month, phase 2, randomized controlled trial in Japanese patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00537082) were maintained in the initial 6-month observational study extension. Here, we report long-term safety and efficacy results of the 3-year follow-up to the phase 2 study extension.MethodsThe 6-month core study was completed by 147 patients, of whom 143 entered the extension and took at least one dose of fingolimod. Those originally randomized to placebo were re-randomized to fingolimod 1.25 mg (n = 23) or 0.5 mg (n = 27). During the extension, the patients taking fingolimod 1.25 mg (n = 46) were switched to open-label fingolimod 0.5 mg, and those originally randomized to fingolimod 0.5 mg (n = 47) continued with open-label fingolimod 0.5 mg.ResultsContinuous fingolimod treatment was associated with a sustained low level of MRI and relapse activity for the duration of the extension phase; 75-100% (range across all assessment time points up to end of study) of patients remained free of Gd-enhanced T1 lesions, 88-100% remained free of new/newly enlarged T2 lesions, and 45-62% remained relapse-free. In patients who switched to the active treatment, a 79.5% decrease in annualized relapse rate (ARR; from 1.131 before switch to 0.232 6-months after switch) was observed in the first 6 months of the extension phase and thereafter remained low until the end of study (0.16-0.31 across all assessment time points after switch up to end of study). The mean number of Gd-enhanced T1 and new/newly enlarged T2 lesions decreased up to month 9 and thereafter remained low until the end of study (0.0-0.1 and 0.0-0.3, respectively, across all assessment time points after switch up to end of study). Fingolimod was generally well-tolerated and the safety profile was consistent with the core and 6-month extension. Serious adverse events were reported in 13.3% of patients during the extension study, with the range in the continuous fingolimod and placebo-fingolimod switch groups (3.7-21.7%) being similar to that reported in the core study for the placebo and fingolimod groups (5.3-20.4%).ConclusionContinuous fingolimod treatment over 36 months was associated with maintained efficacy and a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. These results indicate that fingolimod provides long-term treatment benefit for Japanese patients with relapsing MS.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00670449 (April 28, 2008).
| S-EPMC5273805 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting, where both agents are licensed as a first-line DMT for the treatment of RRMS.MethodsWe identified patients with RRMS commencing dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod in the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances (SVK) Registry between August 2014 and July 2019. Propensity score-matching was applied to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapses and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses.ResultsOf the 2113 included patients, 1922 were matched (dimethyl fumarate, n = 961; fingolimod, n = 961). Relapse rates did not differ between the groups (incident rate ratio 1.0, 95%CI 0.8-1.2, p = 0.86). Moreover, no difference in the hazard of 1-year confirmed disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR] 0.9; 95%CI 0.6-1.6; p = 0.80) or disability improvement (HR 0.9; 95%CI 0.6-1.2; p = 0.40) was detected. These findings were consistent both for treatment-naïve patients and patients switching from another DMT.ConclusionDimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable effectiveness regarding reduction of relapses and disability worsening in RRMS.
| S-EPMC7914245 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Doses of fingolimod lower than 0.5 mg per day were not investigated during the fingolimod clinical development program. Whether lower doses of fingolimod might retain efficacy with fewer safety risks remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod, 0.5 mg, and fingolimod, 0.25 mg, compared with glatiramer acetate and to assess whether these doses of fingolimod show superior efficacy to glatiramer acetate in adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Fingolimod, 0.5 mg, or fingolimod, 0.25 mg, orally once per day or glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, subcutaneously once per day. The Multiple Sclerosis Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Fingolimod Versus Copaxone (ASSESS) was a phase 3b multicenter randomized rater-blinded and dose-blinded 12-month clinical trial conducted between August 9, 2012, and April 30, 2018 (including the time required to recruit participants). A total of 1461 patients aged 18 to 65 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were screened, and 1064 participants were randomized. These participants had at least 1 documented relapse during the previous year or 2 documented relapses during the previous 2 years and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0 to 6 at screening. Data were analyzed between September and November 2018. The superiority of the fingolimod doses was tested hierarchically, with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, tested first, followed by fingolimod, 0.25 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. The primary end point was the reduction in annualized relapse rate (ARR). Magnetic resonance imaging parameters, safety, and tolerability were also assessed. Of 1461 adult patients screened, 1064 participants (72.8%) were randomized (mean [SD] age, 39.6 [11.0] years; 792 women [74.4%]) to 3 treatment groups: 352 participants received fingolimod, 0.5 mg, 370 participants received fingolimod, 0.25 mg, and 342 participants received glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. In total, 859 participants (80.7%) completed the study. Treatment with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, was superior to treatment with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, in reducing ARR (40.7% relative reduction); the relative reduction with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, was 14.6%, which was not statistically significant (for fingolimod, 0.5 mg, ARR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11-0.21; for fingolimod, 0.25 mg, ARR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.17-0.29; for glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, ARR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.34). Treatment with both fingolimod doses (0.5 mg and 0.25 mg) significantly reduced new or newly enlarging T2 and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions compared with treatment with glatiramer acetate. Adverse events were reported in similar proportions across treatment groups (312 participants [90.4%] in the fingolimod, 0.5 mg, group, 323 participants [88.3%] in the fingolimod, 0.25 mg, group, and 283 participants [87.3%] in the glatiramer acetate group). Fingolimod, 0.5 mg, demonstrated superior clinical efficacy compared with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, and had a superior benefit-risk profile compared with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, in adult participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01633112.
| S-EPMC7445630 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To minimize the clinical burden associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), early control of focal and diffuse CNS disease activity is a treatment priority. A post hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the onset of efficacy of fingolimod treatment in patients with relapsing MS. Data from patients who received fingolimod 0.5 mg or placebo during either of two 24-month, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trials (FREEDOMS and FREEDOMS II) were pooled for analysis. Efficacy outcomes were: time to first confirmed relapse; annualized relapse rate (ARR); proportions of patients free from T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions or new/newly enlarged T2 lesions; percentage brain volume loss (BVL); and change in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) z-score from baseline to 6 months. An early benefit was seen with fingolimod (N = 783) vs. placebo (N = 773) for ARR at both 3 and 6 months (3 months, 0.32 vs. 0.52, p = 0.0015; 6 months, 0.21 vs. 0.45, p < 0.0001). Time to first relapse was also delayed with fingolimod vs. placebo from day 48 onwards. At 6 months, more patients in the fingolimod group than in the placebo group were free from new MRI activity (65.3 vs. 40.5%, p < 0.0001) and had less BVL (37.1% reduction vs. placebo, p < 0.001). MSFC z-score favored fingolimod over placebo at 6 months, with improvements noted in 9-Hole Peg Test and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test scores. Improvements in outcomes related to relapses, MRI, disability, cognition, and BVL occurred within 6 months of treatment initiation with fingolimod.
| S-EPMC4751181 | biostudies-literature
Project description:With the recent successful targeting of B lymphocytes in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may represent a promising managemental approach, particularly for those with relapsing/remitting MS (RRMS). A network meta-analysis was conducted based on a comprehensive search in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of currently available anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), including rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab, versus a common comparator (interferon beta-1a [INFβ-1a]) in RRMS patients recruited in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In a frequentist network meta-analytical model, annualized relapse rates (ARRs) and safety outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs), whereas relapse-free events were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Treatment ranking was performed using P-scores. The certainty of evidence was appraised using the GRADE approach. Five publications reported the outcomes of seven RCTs (3938 patients, 67.09% females). Compared to INFβ-1a, ocrelizumab reduced the risk of ARR (RR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.50-0.64), serious adverse events (RR = 0.17, 95% CI, 0.09-0.30), and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (SAEs, RR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.39-0.93), and it was associated with higher odds of no relapses (OR = 2.47, 95% CI, 2.00-3.05). Ocrelizumab ranked best among all other treatments in terms of reducing ARR and SAEs. The quality of evidence was low for ocrelizumab, low to moderate for rituximab, and high for ofatumumab. Further large-sized, well-designed RCTs are needed to corroborate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab and other anti-CD20 mAbs in RRMS.
| S-EPMC8411244 | biostudies-literature