Dataset Information

Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

ABSTRACT: Despite significant dosimetric gains, clinical implementation of the 4? non-coplanar radiotherapy on the widely available C-arm gantry system is hindered by limited clearance, and the need to perform complex coordinated gantry and couch motion. A robotic radiotherapy platform would be conducive to such treatment but a new conflict between field size and MLC modulation resolution needs to be managed for versatile applications. This study investigates the dosimetry and delivery efficiency of purposefully creating many isocenters to achieve simultaneously high MLC modulation resolution and large tumor coverage. An integrated optimization framework was proposed for simultaneous beam orientation optimization (BOO), isocenter selection, and fluence map optimization (FMO). The framework includes a least-square dose fidelity objective, a total variation term for regularizing the fluence smoothness, and a group sparsity term for beam selection. A minimal number of isocenters were identified for efficient target coverage. Colliding beams excluded, high-resolution small-field 4? intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans with 50?cm source-to-isocenter distance (SID-50) on 10 Head and Neck (H&N) cancer patients were compared with low-resolution large-field plans with 100?cm SID (SID-100). With the same or better target coverage, the average reduction of [Dmean, Dmax] of 20-beam SID-50 plans from 20-beam SID-100 plans were [2.09 Gy, 1.19 Gy] for organs at risk (OARs) overall, [3.05 Gy, 0.04 Gy] for parotid gland, [3.62 Gy, 5.19 Gy] for larynx, and [3.27 Gy, 1.10 Gy] for mandible. R50 and integral dose were reduced by 5.3% and 9.6%, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant difference (p???

SUBMITTER: Lyu Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7100370 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

Lyu Qihui Q Neph Ryan R Yu Victoria Y VY Ruan Dan D Boucher Salime S Sheng Ke K

Physics in medicine and biology 20200210 4

Despite significant dosimetric gains, clinical implementation of the 4π non-coplanar radiotherapy on the widely available C-arm gantry system is hindered by limited clearance, and the need to perform complex coordinated gantry and couch motion. A robotic radiotherapy platform would be conducive to such treatment but a new conflict between field size and MLC modulation resolution needs to be managed for versatile applications. This study investigates the dosimetry and delivery efficiency of purpo ...[more]

PMID: 31851958

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo propose and validate a fully automated multicriterial treatment planning solution for a CyberKnife® equipped with an InCiseTM 2 multileaf collimator.MethodsThe AUTO BAO plans are generated using fully automated prioritized multicriterial optimization (AUTO MCO) of pencil-beam fluence maps with integrated noncoplanar beam angle optimization (BAO), followed by MLC segment generation. Both the AUTO MCO and segmentation algorithms have been developed in-house. AUTO MCO generates for each patient a single, high-quality Pareto-optimal IMRT plan. The segmentation algorithm then accurately mimics the AUTO MCO 3D dose distribution, while considering all candidate beams simultaneously, rather than replicating the fluence maps. Pencil-beams, segment dose depositions, and final dose calculations are performed with a stand-alone version of the clinical dose calculation engine. For validation, AUTO BAO plans were generated for 33 prostate SBRT patients and compared to reference plans (REF) that were manually generated with the commercial treatment planning system (TPS), in absence of time pressure. REF plans were also compared to AUTO RB plans, for which fluence map optimization was performed for the beam angle configuration used in the REF plan, and the segmentation could use all these beams or only a subset, depending on the dosimetry.ResultsAUTO BAO plans were clinically acceptable and dosimetrically similar to REF plans, but had on average reduced numbers of beams ((beams in AUTO BAO)/(beams in REF) (relative improvement): 24.7/48.3 (-49%)), segments (59.5/98.9 (-40%)), and delivery times (17.1/22.3 min. (-23%)). Dosimetry of AUTO RB and REF were also similar, but AUTO RB used on average fewer beams (38.0/48.3 (-21%)) and had on average shorter delivery times (18.6/22.3 min. (-17%)). Delivered Monitor Units (MU) were similar for all three planning approaches.ConclusionsA new, vendor-independent optimization workflow for fully automated generation of deliverable high-quality CyberKnife® plans was proposed, including BAO. Compared to manual planning with the commercial TPS, fraction delivery times were reduced by 5.3 min. (-23%) due to large reductions in beam and segment numbers.

Project description:PurposeThe purpose of this study was to measure gantry angle-related eddy currents in a 0.35-T MRI-Linac and determine if B0 (zeroth order) eddy currents are the primary cause of gantry angle-dependent imaging isocenter shifts vs other potential causes like B0 inhomogeneities and gradient (first order) eddy currents. For conventional Cartesian acquisitions, B0 eddy currents can cause imaging isocenter shifts along both phase encode and readout directions. Gradient eddy currents can cause spatial distortion along both the phase encode and readout directions. Center frequency offsets can cause imaging isocenter shifts along the readout direction that vary with readout gradient polarity.MethodsMRI-related eddy currents and imaging isocenter shifts were measured on a 0.35-T MRI-Linac at gantry angles from 0° to 330° in increments of 30° . All measurements were made after gradient shimming and center frequency tuning at each planned gantry angle. Eddy current and field homogeneity measurements were conducted using a 24-cm diameter spherical phantom. Gradient and B0 eddy currents were calculated from the free induction decays (FIDs) resulting from selective excitation of slices located ±5 cm from isocenter. B0 eddy currents were also calculated from FIDs acquired with nonselective excitation and compared with B0 eddy current values derived using selective excitation. B0 inhomogeneities and center frequency offsets were measured by acquiring FIDs with nonselective excitation. Imaging isocenter shifts were measured using a 33x33x10.5 cm3 uniformity linearity (grid) phantom and a 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP) sequence used in MRI-guided radiation therapy. Eddy currents were compared to vendor specifications and correlated with the imaging isocenter shifts. Measurements were conducted before and after the MRI-Linac's waveguide was replaced with an updated design to reduce eddy currents.ResultsB0 eddy currents were highly correlated (r = 0.986, P << 0.001) for measurements made with vs without selective excitation. Transverse (X and Y) axis B0 eddy currents before and after the waveguide upgrade were out of specification (specification: ≤0.1 μT m/mT for delays < 10 ms) for most of the measured gantry angles. Gradient eddy currents before and after the upgrade were within specifications for the measured gantry angles (≤0.1% for delays < 10 ms). B0 eddy currents and imaging isocenter shifts were highly correlated (r = 0.965, P << 0.001). After the Linac waveguide upgrade, root mean square (RMS) peak B0 and gradient eddy currents dropped 45% and 11%, respectively, for delays <10 ms, while imaging isocenter shifts dropped 53%. Isocenter shifts were observed in both phase encode and readout directions. Center frequency offsets were <26 Hz while B0 inhomogeneities were <33 Hz full width at half maximum (FWHM).ConclusionsImaging isocenter shifts measured in a 0.35-T MRI-Linac were highly correlated with B0 eddy currents. The eddy currents and imaging isocenter shifts decreased after the MRI-Linac's waveguide was replaced.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Incidental irradiation of normal brain tissue during radiotherapy is linked to cognitive decline, and may be mediated by damage to healthy cortex. Non-coplanar techniques may be used for cortical sparing. We compared normal brain sparing and probability of cortical atrophy using 4? radiation therapy planning vs. standard fixed gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS:Plans from previously irradiated brain tumor patients ("original IMRT", n?=?13) were re-planned to spare cortex using both 4? optimization ("4?") and IMRT optimization ("optimized IMRT"). Homogeneity index (HI), gradient measure, doses to cortex and white matter (excluding tumor), brainstem, optics, and hippocampus were compared with matching PTV coverage. Probability of three grades of post-treatment cortical atrophy was modeled based on previously established dose response curves. RESULTS:With matching PTV coverage, 4? significantly improved HI by 27% (p?=?0.005) and gradient measure by 8% (p?=?0.001) compared with optimized IMRT. 4? optimization reduced mean and equivalent uniform doses (EUD) to all standard OARs, with 14-15% reduction in hippocampal EUD (p???0.003) compared with the other two plans. 4? significantly reduced dose to fractional cortical volumes (V50, V40 and V30) compared with the original IMRT plans, and reduced cortical V30 by 7% (p?=?0.008) compared with optimized IMRT. White matter EUD, mean dose, and fractional volumes V50, V40 and V30 were also significantly lower with 4? (p???0.001). With 4?, probability of grade 1, 2 and 3 cortical atrophy decreased by 12%, 21% and 26% compared with original IMRT and by 8%, 14% and 3% compared with optimized IMRT, respectively (p???0.001). CONCLUSIONS:4? radiotherapy significantly improved cortical sparing and reduced doses to standard brain OARs, white matter, and the hippocampus. This was achieved with superior PTV dose homogeneity. Such sparing could reduce the probability of cortical atrophy that may lead to cognitive decline.

Dataset Information

Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

Publications

Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets