Dataset Information

Ungated nonenhanced radial quiescent interval slice-selective (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography of the neck: Evaluation of image quality.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Standard-of-care time-of-flight (TOF) techniques for nonenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NEMRA) of the carotid bifurcation and other cervical arteries often provide nondiagnostic image quality due to motion and flow artifacts. PURPOSE:To perform an initial evaluation of an ungated radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) technique for NEMRA of the neck, in comparison with 2D TOF and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA). STUDY TYPE:Retrospective. POPULATION:Sixty patients referred for neck MR angiography. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE:Ungated radial QISS at 3T. ASSESSMENT:Three radiologists scored image quality of 18 arterial segments using a 4-point scale (1, nondiagnostic; 2, fair; 3, good; 4, excellent), and two radiologists graded proximal internal carotid stenosis using five categories (<50%, 50-69%, 70-99%, occlusion, nondiagnostic). STATISTICAL TESTS:Friedman tests with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; unweighted Gwet's AC1 statistic; tests for equality of proportions. RESULTS:Ungated radial QISS provided image quality that significantly exceeded 2D TOF (mean scores of 2.7 vs. 2.0, 2.7 vs. 2.2, and 2.9 vs. 2.3; P < 0.001, all comparisons), while CEMRA provided the best image quality (mean scores of 3.6, 3.7, and 3.5 for the three reviewers). Interrater agreement of image quality scores was substantial for CEMRA (AC1 = 0.70, P < 0.001), and moderate for QISS (AC1 = 0.43, P < 0.001) and TOF (AC1 = 0.41, P < 0.001). Compared with TOF, QISS NEMRA provided a significantly higher percentage of diagnostic segments for all three reviewers (91.0% vs. 71.7%, 93.5% vs. 72.9%, 95.5% vs. 85.2%; P < 0.0001) and demonstrated better agreement with CEMRA for grading of proximal internal carotid stenosis (AC1 = 0.94 vs. 0.73 for reviewer 1, P < 0.05; AC1 = 0.89 vs. 0.68 for reviewer 2, P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION:In this initial study, ungated radial QISS significantly outperformed 2D TOF for the evaluation of the neck arteries, with overall better image quality and more diagnostic arterial segments, and improved agreement with CEMRA for grading stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1798-1807.

SUBMITTER: Koktzoglou I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7101236 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To assess the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, a nonenhanced two-dimensional electrocardiographically gated single-shot balanced steady-state free precession examination for the evaluation of symptomatic chronic lower limb ischemia.For this prospective institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, the institutional review board waived the requirement for informed patient consent. The QISS nonenhanced MR angiography technique was evaluated in a two-center trial involving 53 patients referred for lower extremity MR angiography for suspected or known chronic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with contrast material-enhanced MR angiography serving as the noninvasive reference standard. The accuracy of stenosis assessments performed with the nonenhanced MR angiography sequence was evaluated relative to the reference standard. Per-segment, per-region, and per-limb sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and assessments were considered correct only if they were in exact agreement with the reference standard-derived assessments. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling with use of an unstructured binomial logit analysis was used to account for clustering of multiple measurements per case. The sensitivity and specificity of QISS MR angiography for the determination of nonsignificant (<50%) versus significant (50%-100%) stenosis were compared with the sensitivity and specificity of the reference standard.The diagnostic performance of nonenhanced MR angiography was found to be nearly equivalent to the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Non-GEE segment-based analysis revealed that for the two reviewers, nonenhanced MR angiography had sensitivities of 89.7% (436 of 486 segments) and 87.0% (423 of 486 segments) and specificities of 96.5% (994 of 1030 segments) and 94.6% (973 of 1028 segments).QISS nonenhanced MR angiography offers an alternative to currently used imaging tests for symptomatic chronic lower limb ischemia, for which the administration of iodinated or gadolinium-based contrast agents is contraindicated.

Project description:BackgroundFree-breathing noncontrast-enhanced (non-CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques are of considerable interest for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (APE), due to the possibility for repeated examinations, avoidance of side effects from iodine-based contrast agents, and the absence of ionizing radiation exposure as compared to CE-computed tomographic angiography (CTA).PurposeTo analyze the clinical performance of free-breathing and electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS)-MRA compared to CE-CTA and to Cartesian balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP)-MRA.Study typeProspective.SubjectsThirty patients with confirmed APE and 30 healthy volunteers (HVs).Field strength/sequenceRadial QISS- and bSSFP-MRA at 1.5T.AssessmentSignal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were computed to compare the pulmonary imaging quality between MRA methods. The pulmonary arterial tree was divided into 25 branches and an ordinal scoring system was used to assess the image quality of each pulmonary branch. The clinical performance of the two MRA techniques in accurately assessing APE was evaluated with respect to CE-CTA as the clinical reference standard.Statistical testsWilcoxon signed-rank and Spearman's correlation tests were performed. Sensitivity and specificity of the MRA techniques were determined using CE-CTA as the clinical reference standard.ResultsThrombus-mimicking artifacts appeared more frequently in lobar and peripheral arteries of patients with Cartesian bSSFP than with radial QISS-MRA (pulmonary trunk: 12.2% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.64; lobar arteries: 35.6% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.005, peripheral arteries: 74.4% vs. 49.0%, P < 0.001). The relative increases in SNR and of CNR provided by radial QISS-MRA with respect to Cartesian bSSFP-MRA were 30-35% (P-values of SNR/CNR, HVs: 0.09/0.09, patients: 0.03/0.02). The image quality of pulmonary arterial branches was considered good to excellent in 77.2% of patients with radial QISS-MRA and in 43.2% with Cartesian bSSFP-MRA (P < 0.0001). The clinical performance of radial QISS-MRA was higher than Cartesian bSSFP-MRA for grading embolism, with a total sensitivity of 86.0% vs. 80.6% and a specificity of 93.3% vs. 84.0%, respectively.Data conclusionRadial QISS-MRA is a reliable and safe non-CE angiographic technique with promising clinical potential compared to Cartesian bSSFP-MRA and as an alternative technique to CE-CTA for the diagnosis of APE.Level of evidence1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Project description:The high incidence of renal insufficiency in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease raises the concern for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) with respect to contrast enhanced MRA. The risk of NSF is eliminated with non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. The purpose of the current study is to compare image quality and diagnostic performance of non-contrast enhanced Quiescent Interval Single Shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T versus CT angiography for evaluation of lower extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD).32 consecutive patients (23 male, 9 female, age range 40-81 years, average age 61.97 years) with clinically suspected lower extremity PAD underwent QISS MRA and CTA. 19 of 32 patients underwent Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). Image quality of MRA was compared with CTA by two radiologists with 10 and 8 years' experience according to a 4-point scale. The Kappa test was used to determine the intermodality agreement between MRA and CTA in stenosis assessment, and interobserver agreement with each method. Sensitivity and specificity of CTA and MRA in detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis (≥50 %) were compared, with DSA serving as reference standard when available.Image quality of QISS MRA was rated 3.70 ± 0.49 by reader 1, and 3.72 ± 0.47 by reader 2, significantly lower than that of CTA (3.80 ± 0.44 and 3.82 ± 0.42, P < 0.001 for both readers). Intermodality agreement between MRA and CTA was excellent for assessment of stenosis (Kappa = 0.923 ± 0.013 for reader 1, 0.930 ± 0.012 for reader 2). Interobserver agreement was 0.936 ± 0.012 for CTA and 0.935 ± 0.011 for MRA. For readers 1 and 2 respectively, the sensitivity of QISS was 94.25 and 93.26 % (versus 90.11 and 89.13 % for CTA, P > 0.05), and specificity of QISS was 96.70 and 97.75 % (versus 96.55 and 96.51 % for CTA, P > 0.05). For heavily calcified segments, sensitivity of QISS (95.83 and 95.83 %) was significantly higher than that of CTA (74.19 and 76.67 %, P < 0.05).QISS is a reliable alternative to CTA for evaluation of lower extremity PAD, and may be suitable as a first-line screening examination in patients with contraindications to intravenous contrast administration.

Project description:PurposeTo develop a whole-heart, free-breathing, non-electrocardiograph (ECG)-gated, cardiac-phase-resolved myocardial perfusion MRI framework (CRIMP; Continuous Radial Interleaved simultaneous Multi-slice acquisitions at sPoiled steady-state) and test its quantification feasibility.MethodsCRIMP used interleaved radial simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) slice groups to cover the whole heart in 9 or 12 short-axis slices. The sequence continuously acquired data without magnetization preparation, ECG gating or breath-holding, and captured multiple cardiac phases. Images were reconstructed by a motion-compensated patch-based locally low-rank reconstruction. Bloch simulations were performed to study the signal-to-noise ratio/contrast-to-noise ratio (SNR/CNR) for CRIMP and to study the steady-state signal under motion. Seven patients were scanned with CRIMP at stress and rest to develop the sequence. One human and two dogs were scanned at rest with a dual-bolus method to test the quantification feasibility of CRIMP. The dual-bolus scans were performed using both CRIMP and an ungated radial SMS saturation recovery (SMS-SR) sequence with injection dose = 0.075 mmol/kg to compare the sequences in terms of SNR, cardiac phase resolution and quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF).ResultsPerfusion images with multiple cardiac phases in all image slices with a temporal resolution of 72 ms/frame were obtained. Simulations and in-vivo acquisitions showed CRIMP kept the inner slices in steady-state regardless of motion. CRIMP outperformed SMS-SR in slice coverage (9 over 6), SNR (mean 20% improvement), and provided cardiac phase resolution. CRIMP and SMS-SR sequences provided comparable MBF values (rest systolic CRIMP = 0.58 ± 0.07, SMS-SR = 0.61 ± 0.16).ConclusionCRIMP allows for whole-heart, cardiac-phase-resolved myocardial perfusion images without ECG-gating or breath-holding. The sequence can provide MBF if an accurate arterial input function is obtained separately.

Dataset Information

Ungated nonenhanced radial quiescent interval slice-selective (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography of the neck: Evaluation of image quality.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets