Dataset Information

Can metagenomic next-generation sequencing identify the pathogens responsible for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection?

ABSTRACT:

Background

The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted antibiotics for the treatment of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing results and (2) verify the accuracy and reliability of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for identifying pathogens related to culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.

Methods

Ninety-seven consecutive PJI patients, including 27 patients with culture-negative prosthetic joint infection, were treated surgically at our center. Thirteen of the 27 culture-negative prosthetic joint infection patients, who were admitted before June 2017 and treated with empirical antibiotics, comprised the empirical antibiotic group (EA group), and the other 14 patients, who were admitted after June 2017 and treated with targeted antibiotics according to their metagenomic next-generation sequencing results, were classified as the targeted antibiotic group (TA group). The short-term infection control rate, incidence of antibiotic-related complications and costs were compared between the two groups.

Results

Two of the patients in the EA group experienced debridement and prolonged antimicrobial therapy due to wound infection after the initial revision surgery. No recurrent infections were observed in the TA group; however, no significant difference in the infection control rate was found between the two groups (83.33% vs 100%, P?=?0.217). More cases of antibiotic-related complications were recorded in the EA group (6 cases) than in the TA group (1 case), but the difference was not statistically significant (P?=?0.0697). The cost of antibiotics obtained for the EA group was 20,168.37 Yuan (3236.38-45,297.16), which was higher than that found for the TA group (10,164.16 Yuan, 2959.54-16,661.04, P?=?0.04).

Conclusions

Targeted antibiotic treatment for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing results is associated with a favorable outcome, and metagenomic next-generation sequencing is a reliable tool for identifying pathogens related to culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.

SUBMITTER: Wang C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7106575 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Can metagenomic next-generation sequencing identify the pathogens responsible for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection?

Wang Chaoxin C Huang Zida Z Li Wenbo W Fang Xinyu X Zhang Wenming W

BMC infectious diseases 20200330 1

<h4>Background</h4>The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted antibiotics for the treatment of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing results and (2) verify the accuracy and reliability of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for identifying pathogens related to culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.<h4>Methods</h4>Ninety-seven consecutive PJI patients, including 27 patients with culture-negative pr ...[more]

PMID: 32228597

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) remains poorly characterized. Here, we retrospectively analyzed data from patients with TBM who had taken both mNGS and conventional tests including culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and acid-fast bacillus (AFB) stain, and the sensitivity and specificity of these methods were compared.MethodsWe retrospectively recruited TBM patients admitted to the hospital between December 2015 and October 2018. The first collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples underwent both mNGS and conventional tests. In addition, patients with bacterial/cryptococcal meningitis or viral meningoencephalitis were mNGS positive controls, and a patient with auto-immune encephalitis was an mNGS negative control.ResultsTwenty three TBM patients were classified as 12 definite and 11 clinical diagnoses, which were based on clinical manifestations, pathogen evidence, CSF parameters, brain imaging, and treatment response. The mNGS method identified sequences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MBTC) from 18 samples (18/23, 78.26%). In patients with definite TBM, the sensitivity of mNGS, AFB, PCR, and culture to detect MTB in the first CSF samples were 66.67, 33.33, 25, and 8.33%, respectively. The specificity of each method was 100%. Among the four negative mNGS cases (4/23, 17.39%), three turned out positive by repeated AFB stain. The agreement of mNGS with the total of conventional methods was 44.44% (8/18). Combination of mNGS and conventional methods increased the detection rate to 95.65%. One patient was diagnosed as complex of TBM and cryptococcal meningitis, in which AFB stain and cryptococcal antigen enzyme immunoassay were positive and the DNA of Cryptococcus neoformans was detected by mNGS.ConclusionOur study indicates that mNGS is an alternative method to detect the presence of mycobacterial DNA in CSF samples from patients with TBM and deserves to be applied as a front-line CSF test.

Project description:BackgroundMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising technology that allows unbiased pathogen detection and is increasingly being used for clinical diagnoses. However, its application in urinary tract infection (UTI) is still scarce.MethodsThe medical records of 33 patients with suspected UTI who were admitted to the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from March 2021 to July 2022 and received urine mNGS were retrospectively analyzed. The performance of mNGS and conventional urine culture in diagnosing infection and identifying causative organisms was compared, and the treatment effects were evaluated in terms of changes in urinalyses and urinary symptoms.ResultsIn the detection of bacteria and fungi, mNGS detected at least one pathogen in 29 (87.9%) cases, including 19 (57.6%) with positive mNGS but negative culture results and 10 (30.3%) with both mNGS and culture positive results. The remaining 4 (12.1%) patients were negative by both tests. Overall, mNGS performed better than culture (87.9% vs. 30.3%, P < 0.001). Within the 10 double-positive patients, mNGS matched culture results exactly in 5 cases, partially in 4 cases, and not at all in 1 case. In addition, mNGS detected a broader pathogen spectrum, detecting 26 species compared to only 5 species found in culture. The most abundant bacteria detected by mNGS was Escherichia coli, detected in 9 (27.2%) patients. All anaerobic bacteria, Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and all mixed pathogens were detected by mNGS. The final clinical diagnosis of UTI was made in 25 cases, and the sensitivity of mNGS was significantly higher than culture (100.0% vs 40.0%; P < 0.001) when using the diagnosis as a reference standard; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value and specificity were 86.2%, 100% and 50.0%, respectively. Importantly, targeted antibiotic therapy based on mNGS resulted in significant improvement in urinalyses and urinary symptoms in patients.ConclusionsmNGS is a technology that has shown clear advantages over culture, particularly in the context of mixed infections and UTIs that are difficult to diagnose and treat. It helps to improve the detection of pathogens, guide changes in treatment strategies, and is an effective complement to urine culture.

Dataset Information

Can metagenomic next-generation sequencing identify the pathogens responsible for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection?

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Can metagenomic next-generation sequencing identify the pathogens responsible for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets